Fun Facts About the Name Thomas
- A favorite across generations: Thomas stayed in the U.S. top 100 every year from 1880 through 2025 - 146 consecutive years.
- An all-time favorite: U.S. records show 2,358,541 boys named Thomas from 1880 through 2025.
- Still popular, but losing ground: Thomas's rank fell 7 places between 1995 and 2025, while remaining in the top 100.
- More than 2 million babies named Thomas: U.S. records list 2,367,052 babies given the name Thomas from 1880 through 2025. Even 8,511 girls received the name Thomas - about 1 girl for every 277 boys.
What Does the Name Thomas Mean?
Thomas means "twin." The name comes from Greek Θωμᾶς (Thōmas), a Greek form of an Aramaic word. The Aramaic תְּאוֹמָא (t'omā) and the related Hebrew תָּאוֹם (ta'om) both mean "twin."
In the New Testament, the apostle Thomas is also called Didymus, a Greek word with the same meaning; this reinforces the etymology. The later association with doubt comes from the biblical account of the apostle, not from the name's etymology.
Thomas Name History & Origins
Thomas entered European naming through the Greek New Testament. The apostle Thomas appears in the Gospels and in the Acts of the Apostles, and the Gospel of John explains that he was also called Didymus. Greek-speaking Christians used Θωμᾶς, which passed into Latin as Thomas. From Latin it passed into the languages of western Europe and into Middle English as Thomas.
Thomas appears often in medieval English records. Thomas Becket, archbishop of Canterbury from 1162 until his murder in 1170, is a prominent English bearer; he was canonized in 1173. Thomas Aquinas, the thirteenth-century theologian, is another well-known medieval example. Thomas More, executed in 1535 and canonized in 1935, is a later notable bearer.
Common short forms include Tom and Tommy. The name is found in many European languages, often in forms close to the Latin, such as French Thomas, German Thomas, Italian Tommaso, and Spanish Tomás. The phrase "Doubting Thomas" comes from the Gospel of John, where Thomas asks for proof of the Resurrection; this traditional label is separate from the name's etymology.
How Popular is the Name Thomas?
Thomas has maintained century-spanning popularity, remaining an unbroken fixture in the U.S. top 100 continuously from 1880 to 2025.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #13,075 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2024 | #17,412 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2023 | #13,326 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2022 | #10,323 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2021 | #17,446 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2020 | #12,044 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 2018 | #13,677 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2017 | #9,876 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2016 | #10,792 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2015 | #10,800 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2014 | #16,351 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2013 | #13,049 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 2012 | #11,188 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2011 | #11,128 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2010 | #10,402 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2009 | #9,342 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 2007 | #13,833 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2006 | #7,455 | 17 | 0.0009% |
| 2005 | #10,859 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 2004 | #3,742 | 39 | 0.0021% |
| 2003 | #7,182 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 2002 | #7,795 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2001 | #7,292 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 2000 | #5,140 | 23 | 0.0013% |
| 1999 | #5,644 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1998 | #6,051 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 1997 | #5,403 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1996 | #3,627 | 31 | 0.0018% |
| 1995 | #3,663 | 30 | 0.0017% |
| 1994 | #4,835 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 1993 | #3,765 | 29 | 0.0016% |
| 1992 | #3,265 | 35 | 0.0019% |
| 1991 | #2,883 | 41 | 0.0022% |
| 1990 | #2,693 | 44 | 0.0023% |
| 1989 | #1,896 | 70 | 0.0038% |
| 1988 | #1,259 | 117 | 0.0066% |
| 1987 | #1,178 | 125 | 0.0072% |
| 1986 | #1,134 | 128 | 0.0075% |
| 1985 | #1,225 | 113 | 0.0066% |
| 1984 | #1,152 | 119 | 0.0071% |
| 1983 | #991 | 147 | 0.0088% |
| 1982 | #1,220 | 110 | 0.0065% |
| 1981 | #1,206 | 109 | 0.0065% |
| 1980 | #1,194 | 112 | 0.0067% |
| 1979 | #1,118 | 122 | 0.0076% |
| 1978 | #1,045 | 131 | 0.0086% |
| 1977 | #1,066 | 123 | 0.0080% |
| 1976 | #1,153 | 101 | 0.0069% |
| 1975 | #1,298 | 86 | 0.0059% |
| 1974 | #1,203 | 93 | 0.0063% |
| 1973 | #1,119 | 101 | 0.0069% |
| 1972 | #1,145 | 96 | 0.0063% |
| 1971 | #974 | 131 | 0.0079% |
| 1970 | #960 | 133 | 0.0076% |
| 1969 | #1,094 | 103 | 0.0061% |
| 1968 | #946 | 121 | 0.0074% |
| 1967 | #864 | 138 | 0.0084% |
| 1966 | #942 | 117 | 0.0069% |
| 1965 | #980 | 112 | 0.0063% |
| 1964 | #1,015 | 113 | 0.0060% |
| 1963 | #906 | 135 | 0.0070% |
| 1962 | #1,007 | 114 | 0.0058% |
| 1961 | #1,049 | 110 | 0.0054% |
| 1960 | #986 | 119 | 0.0059% |
| 1959 | #932 | 127 | 0.0063% |
| 1958 | #968 | 115 | 0.0057% |
| 1957 | #988 | 111 | 0.0054% |
| 1956 | #1,006 | 104 | 0.0052% |
| 1955 | #1,184 | 72 | 0.0037% |
| 1954 | #1,122 | 78 | 0.0040% |
| 1953 | #967 | 98 | 0.0052% |
| 1952 | #1,073 | 78 | 0.0042% |
| 1951 | #986 | 90 | 0.0050% |
| 1950 | #1,017 | 81 | 0.0047% |
| 1949 | #878 | 101 | 0.0059% |
| 1948 | #895 | 95 | 0.0056% |
| 1947 | #868 | 103 | 0.0058% |
| 1946 | #794 | 108 | 0.0069% |
| 1945 | #754 | 100 | 0.0077% |
| 1944 | #768 | 100 | 0.0075% |
| 1943 | #815 | 91 | 0.0065% |
| 1942 | #747 | 103 | 0.0076% |
| 1941 | #844 | 75 | 0.0062% |
| 1940 | #750 | 86 | 0.0075% |
| 1939 | #804 | 74 | 0.0067% |
| 1938 | #809 | 76 | 0.0069% |
| 1937 | #855 | 66 | 0.0062% |
| 1936 | #779 | 76 | 0.0073% |
| 1935 | #797 | 73 | 0.0070% |
| 1934 | #869 | 62 | 0.0059% |
| 1933 | #669 | 96 | 0.0095% |
| 1932 | #711 | 92 | 0.0086% |
| 1931 | #715 | 89 | 0.0084% |
| 1930 | #614 | 128 | 0.0114% |
| 1929 | #628 | 121 | 0.0108% |
| 1928 | #591 | 143 | 0.0124% |
| 1927 | #673 | 116 | 0.0097% |
| 1926 | #694 | 110 | 0.0093% |
| 1925 | #846 | 78 | 0.0064% |
| 1924 | #814 | 85 | 0.0068% |
| 1923 | #906 | 66 | 0.0055% |
| 1922 | #896 | 67 | 0.0056% |
| 1921 | #852 | 76 | 0.0062% |
| 1920 | #805 | 82 | 0.0068% |
| 1919 | #866 | 66 | 0.0058% |
| 1918 | #867 | 69 | 0.0060% |
| 1917 | #943 | 55 | 0.0051% |
| 1916 | #991 | 49 | 0.0047% |
| 1915 | #987 | 46 | 0.0047% |
| 1914 | #854 | 48 | 0.0063% |
| 1913 | #900 | 36 | 0.0058% |
| 1912 | #867 | 34 | 0.0061% |
| 1911 | #928 | 23 | 0.0055% |
| 1910 | #1,062 | 18 | 0.0045% |
| 1909 | #1,279 | 12 | 0.0035% |
| 1908 | #846 | 22 | 0.0066% |
| 1907 | #1,202 | 12 | 0.0038% |
| 1906 | #1,095 | 13 | 0.0044% |
| 1905 | #898 | 18 | 0.0062% |
| 1904 | #934 | 16 | 0.0058% |
| 1903 | #1,302 | 9 | 0.0034% |
| 1902 | #901 | 16 | 0.0061% |
| 1901 | #1,000 | 12 | 0.0050% |
| 1900 | #963 | 16 | 0.0053% |
| 1899 | #1,272 | 8 | 0.0034% |
| 1898 | #1,092 | 11 | 0.0043% |
| 1897 | #821 | 16 | 0.0068% |
| 1896 | #1,041 | 11 | 0.0046% |
| 1895 | #890 | 14 | 0.0060% |
| 1894 | #1,124 | 9 | 0.0040% |
| 1893 | #766 | 16 | 0.0075% |
| 1892 | #758 | 16 | 0.0075% |
| 1891 | #789 | 13 | 0.0070% |
| 1890 | #1,001 | 9 | 0.0047% |
| 1889 | #796 | 12 | 0.0067% |
| 1888 | #721 | 14 | 0.0078% |
| 1887 | #1,027 | 7 | 0.0048% |
| 1886 | #888 | 8 | 0.0055% |
| 1885 | #790 | 9 | 0.0068% |
| 1884 | #725 | 10 | 0.0078% |
| 1882 | #559 | 12 | 0.0111% |
| 1881 | #535 | 11 | 0.0120% |
| 1880 | #673 | 8 | 0.0088% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #34 | 6,917 | 0.4050% |
| 2024 | #39 | 6,576 | 0.3834% |
| 2023 | #41 | 6,620 | 0.3875% |
| 2022 | #45 | 6,507 | 0.3730% |
| 2021 | #46 | 6,680 | 0.3821% |
| 2020 | #45 | 6,447 | 0.3737% |
| 2019 | #47 | 6,666 | 0.3717% |
| 2018 | #49 | 6,836 | 0.3765% |
| 2017 | #49 | 7,184 | 0.3883% |
| 2016 | #48 | 7,365 | 0.3882% |
| 2015 | #51 | 7,203 | 0.3759% |
| 2014 | #54 | 7,041 | 0.3666% |
| 2013 | #61 | 6,797 | 0.3594% |
| 2012 | #63 | 6,855 | 0.3614% |
| 2011 | #63 | 6,928 | 0.3648% |
| 2010 | #62 | 7,135 | 0.3719% |
| 2009 | #57 | 7,727 | 0.3896% |
| 2008 | #52 | 8,368 | 0.4102% |
| 2007 | #52 | 8,935 | 0.4306% |
| 2006 | #51 | 9,514 | 0.4629% |
| 2005 | #40 | 10,041 | 0.5028% |
| 2004 | #37 | 10,504 | 0.5292% |
| 2003 | #36 | 10,934 | 0.5535% |
| 2002 | #36 | 11,293 | 0.5817% |
| 2001 | #33 | 12,148 | 0.6253% |
| 2000 | #33 | 12,639 | 0.6436% |
| 1999 | #31 | 12,793 | 0.6663% |
| 1998 | #31 | 12,890 | 0.6744% |
| 1997 | #31 | 12,899 | 0.6843% |
| 1996 | #28 | 13,805 | 0.7288% |
| 1995 | #27 | 14,163 | 0.7440% |
| 1994 | #27 | 14,910 | 0.7718% |
| 1993 | #27 | 14,868 | 0.7581% |
| 1992 | #27 | 15,288 | 0.7654% |
| 1991 | #28 | 16,788 | 0.8310% |
| 1990 | #26 | 18,230 | 0.8876% |
| 1989 | #23 | 18,436 | 0.9214% |
| 1988 | #23 | 18,808 | 0.9825% |
| 1987 | #24 | 18,137 | 0.9715% |
| 1986 | #26 | 17,363 | 0.9429% |
| 1985 | #25 | 17,607 | 0.9526% |
| 1984 | #25 | 17,597 | 0.9749% |
| 1983 | #24 | 17,565 | 0.9798% |
| 1982 | #23 | 17,579 | 0.9687% |
| 1981 | #26 | 17,160 | 0.9580% |
| 1980 | #25 | 17,565 | 0.9845% |
| 1979 | #26 | 16,456 | 0.9558% |
| 1978 | #23 | 16,483 | 1.0039% |
| 1977 | #22 | 16,591 | 1.0096% |
| 1976 | #23 | 16,122 | 1.0274% |
| 1975 | #20 | 16,535 | 1.0589% |
| 1974 | #20 | 17,270 | 1.0983% |
| 1973 | #19 | 17,924 | 1.1500% |
| 1972 | #20 | 19,561 | 1.2062% |
| 1971 | #17 | 23,150 | 1.3090% |
| 1970 | #17 | 26,674 | 1.4354% |
| 1969 | #13 | 27,466 | 1.5359% |
| 1968 | #12 | 27,424 | 1.5779% |
| 1967 | #12 | 28,251 | 1.6200% |
| 1966 | #10 | 29,005 | 1.6263% |
| 1965 | #9 | 31,606 | 1.6990% |
| 1964 | #9 | 34,451 | 1.7288% |
| 1963 | #9 | 35,490 | 1.7476% |
| 1962 | #9 | 36,525 | 1.7656% |
| 1961 | #9 | 37,568 | 1.7688% |
| 1960 | #9 | 39,273 | 1.8421% |
| 1959 | #9 | 40,291 | 1.8876% |
| 1958 | #9 | 42,087 | 1.9831% |
| 1957 | #9 | 44,624 | 2.0685% |
| 1956 | #9 | 44,841 | 2.1198% |
| 1955 | #8 | 45,855 | 2.2262% |
| 1954 | #8 | 47,157 | 2.3130% |
| 1953 | #8 | 47,009 | 2.3834% |
| 1952 | #8 | 48,650 | 2.5030% |
| 1951 | #8 | 48,275 | 2.5639% |
| 1950 | #8 | 45,596 | 2.5468% |
| 1949 | #8 | 45,195 | 2.5478% |
| 1948 | #8 | 43,778 | 2.4950% |
| 1947 | #8 | 44,840 | 2.4509% |
| 1946 | #8 | 38,876 | 2.3938% |
| 1945 | #8 | 31,873 | 2.3683% |
| 1944 | #8 | 31,603 | 2.3189% |
| 1943 | #8 | 32,874 | 2.3033% |
| 1942 | #8 | 31,097 | 2.2516% |
| 1941 | #8 | 26,643 | 2.1691% |
| 1940 | #8 | 23,992 | 2.0698% |
| 1939 | #9 | 22,128 | 1.9992% |
| 1938 | #9 | 21,380 | 1.9276% |
| 1937 | #9 | 19,771 | 1.8536% |
| 1936 | #8 | 18,343 | 1.7685% |
| 1935 | #9 | 17,685 | 1.6983% |
| 1934 | #9 | 17,372 | 1.6824% |
| 1933 | #10 | 16,506 | 1.6647% |
| 1932 | #10 | 16,835 | 1.6123% |
| 1931 | #10 | 16,846 | 1.6203% |
| 1930 | #11 | 17,007 | 1.5498% |
| 1929 | #11 | 16,274 | 1.5130% |
| 1928 | #11 | 16,582 | 1.4971% |
| 1927 | #11 | 17,027 | 1.5109% |
| 1926 | #11 | 16,592 | 1.4941% |
| 1925 | #11 | 16,688 | 1.4955% |
| 1924 | #11 | 16,555 | 1.4615% |
| 1923 | #12 | 15,886 | 1.4493% |
| 1922 | #11 | 15,261 | 1.4025% |
| 1921 | #11 | 15,308 | 1.3898% |
| 1920 | #11 | 14,936 | 1.4033% |
| 1919 | #10 | 13,434 | 1.3706% |
| 1918 | #10 | 13,910 | 1.3725% |
| 1917 | #10 | 12,611 | 1.3626% |
| 1916 | #10 | 11,998 | 1.3480% |
| 1915 | #10 | 11,490 | 1.3540% |
| 1914 | #11 | 8,850 | 1.3516% |
| 1913 | #10 | 7,096 | 1.3844% |
| 1912 | #10 | 6,087 | 1.4158% |
| 1911 | #10 | 3,292 | 1.4568% |
| 1910 | #12 | 2,851 | 1.4680% |
| 1909 | #10 | 2,468 | 1.5049% |
| 1908 | #10 | 2,301 | 1.4909% |
| 1907 | #11 | 2,174 | 1.4807% |
| 1906 | #10 | 2,176 | 1.6342% |
| 1905 | #10 | 2,135 | 1.6137% |
| 1904 | #11 | 2,057 | 1.6055% |
| 1903 | #10 | 1,962 | 1.6456% |
| 1902 | #11 | 2,134 | 1.7398% |
| 1901 | #11 | 1,820 | 1.7094% |
| 1900 | #11 | 2,556 | 1.6986% |
| 1899 | #11 | 1,811 | 1.7051% |
| 1898 | #10 | 2,161 | 1.7614% |
| 1897 | #11 | 1,980 | 1.7560% |
| 1896 | #12 | 2,088 | 1.7463% |
| 1895 | #11 | 2,153 | 1.8340% |
| 1894 | #12 | 2,170 | 1.8744% |
| 1893 | #12 | 2,157 | 1.9204% |
| 1892 | #12 | 2,413 | 1.9773% |
| 1891 | #12 | 1,982 | 1.9587% |
| 1890 | #12 | 2,200 | 1.9816% |
| 1889 | #12 | 2,233 | 2.0194% |
| 1888 | #12 | 2,449 | 2.0264% |
| 1887 | #9 | 2,151 | 2.1211% |
| 1886 | #10 | 2,337 | 2.1095% |
| 1885 | #10 | 2,266 | 2.1021% |
| 1884 | #8 | 2,572 | 2.2474% |
| 1883 | #10 | 2,316 | 2.2136% |
| 1882 | #8 | 2,610 | 2.2958% |
| 1881 | #9 | 2,282 | 2.2653% |
| 1880 | #8 | 2,534 | 2.2934% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.