Fun Facts About the Name David
- A favorite across generations: David stayed in the U.S. top 100 every year from 1880 through 2025 - 146 consecutive years.
- An all-time favorite: U.S. records show 3,676,524 boys named David from 1880 through 2025.
- Still popular, but losing ground: David's rank fell 19 places between 1995 and 2025, while remaining in the top 100.
- More than 3 million babies named David: U.S. records list 3,689,484 babies given the name David from 1880 through 2025. Even 12,960 girls received the name David - about 1 girl for every 284 boys.
What Does the Name David Mean?
David is a masculine given name from Hebrew, traditionally explained as beloved. It appears in the Hebrew Bible as דָּוִד (Dāwīḏ), the name of Israel's second king. The usual derivation connects it with the Hebrew noun דּוֹד (dod), meaning 'beloved' and also 'uncle' or 'lover.' Because the name is ancient, its exact etymology is not certain; 'beloved' is the established conventional meaning rather than a strict translation of a known verb. Some scholars compare the Akkadian noun dādu, 'beloved,' while others suggest the name may be a shortened theophoric form; no derivation is universally accepted. The name is a personal name, not simply an ordinary Hebrew word, and its sense is inferred from related vocabulary.
David Name History & Origins
The Hebrew name דָּוִד (Dāwīḏ) is best known from the biblical King David, whom the Books of Samuel present as the second king of Israel and the founder of a dynasty in Jerusalem. The Tel Dan Stele, an Aramaic inscription dated to the ninth century BCE, refers to the 'house of David' (byt dwd), an early extra-biblical reference to the Davidic dynasty. The personal name is therefore attested in the Iron Age Levant, and it continued in Jewish use after the biblical period.
The name passed into Greek as Δαυίδ (Dauid) in the New Testament, where David is named as an ancestor of Jesus in the Gospels. Latin Bibles used David, and this form became the standard in most European languages. In Arabic, the Qur'an calls the prophet and king دَاوُود (Dāwūd), a form used throughout the Muslim world. The English name comes from Latin David, by way of Greek, and not from the Welsh saint's name Dewi, which is unrelated.
In medieval Europe, David was used in Christian and Jewish communities. It appears in Scotland by the twelfth century, notably in the name of King David I (r. 1124 - 1153), and the Welsh form Dafydd developed alongside it. Other language forms include Dawid in Polish and Davide in Italian.
How Popular is the Name David?
David has maintained century-spanning popularity, remaining an unbroken fixture in the U.S. top 100 continuously from 1880 to 2025.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #12,214 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2024 | #12,438 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2023 | #11,427 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 2022 | #14,008 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 2021 | #9,112 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 2020 | #9,732 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2019 | #8,717 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 2018 | #7,866 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2017 | #10,903 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2016 | #7,689 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 2015 | #6,520 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 2014 | #8,595 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 2013 | #7,858 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 2012 | #6,937 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 2011 | #6,636 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 2010 | #5,466 | 25 | 0.0014% |
| 2009 | #7,774 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 2008 | #6,184 | 22 | 0.0012% |
| 2007 | #5,757 | 24 | 0.0012% |
| 2006 | #4,712 | 30 | 0.0016% |
| 2005 | #5,140 | 25 | 0.0014% |
| 2004 | #2,534 | 66 | 0.0036% |
| 2003 | #4,239 | 31 | 0.0017% |
| 2002 | #3,538 | 38 | 0.0021% |
| 2001 | #3,327 | 41 | 0.0023% |
| 2000 | #3,130 | 44 | 0.0024% |
| 1999 | #3,058 | 43 | 0.0024% |
| 1998 | #3,030 | 42 | 0.0024% |
| 1997 | #3,175 | 37 | 0.0021% |
| 1996 | #2,182 | 62 | 0.0035% |
| 1995 | #1,988 | 69 | 0.0039% |
| 1994 | #1,870 | 76 | 0.0043% |
| 1993 | #1,684 | 89 | 0.0049% |
| 1992 | #1,403 | 117 | 0.0063% |
| 1991 | #1,611 | 94 | 0.0050% |
| 1990 | #1,336 | 120 | 0.0063% |
| 1989 | #1,120 | 148 | 0.0080% |
| 1988 | #751 | 250 | 0.0140% |
| 1987 | #718 | 252 | 0.0145% |
| 1986 | #669 | 274 | 0.0160% |
| 1985 | #640 | 290 | 0.0169% |
| 1984 | #708 | 235 | 0.0140% |
| 1983 | #567 | 321 | 0.0192% |
| 1982 | #704 | 250 | 0.0148% |
| 1981 | #735 | 224 | 0.0134% |
| 1980 | #627 | 291 | 0.0175% |
| 1979 | #619 | 285 | 0.0178% |
| 1978 | #655 | 245 | 0.0160% |
| 1977 | #647 | 252 | 0.0164% |
| 1976 | #669 | 229 | 0.0156% |
| 1975 | #646 | 237 | 0.0163% |
| 1974 | #649 | 234 | 0.0159% |
| 1973 | #658 | 226 | 0.0155% |
| 1972 | #643 | 237 | 0.0156% |
| 1971 | #639 | 259 | 0.0156% |
| 1970 | #600 | 290 | 0.0166% |
| 1969 | #572 | 296 | 0.0175% |
| 1968 | #590 | 265 | 0.0162% |
| 1967 | #561 | 282 | 0.0171% |
| 1966 | #629 | 231 | 0.0137% |
| 1965 | #667 | 219 | 0.0124% |
| 1964 | #647 | 249 | 0.0131% |
| 1963 | #659 | 236 | 0.0122% |
| 1962 | #579 | 290 | 0.0147% |
| 1961 | #680 | 233 | 0.0115% |
| 1960 | #682 | 223 | 0.0110% |
| 1959 | #654 | 235 | 0.0116% |
| 1958 | #690 | 205 | 0.0102% |
| 1957 | #785 | 165 | 0.0081% |
| 1956 | #789 | 157 | 0.0078% |
| 1955 | #788 | 149 | 0.0076% |
| 1954 | #748 | 153 | 0.0079% |
| 1953 | #748 | 149 | 0.0079% |
| 1952 | #776 | 133 | 0.0072% |
| 1951 | #903 | 102 | 0.0057% |
| 1950 | #743 | 134 | 0.0078% |
| 1949 | #807 | 116 | 0.0068% |
| 1948 | #783 | 121 | 0.0071% |
| 1947 | #833 | 111 | 0.0063% |
| 1946 | #805 | 105 | 0.0067% |
| 1945 | #810 | 87 | 0.0067% |
| 1944 | #763 | 100 | 0.0075% |
| 1943 | #736 | 110 | 0.0079% |
| 1942 | #698 | 114 | 0.0084% |
| 1941 | #730 | 94 | 0.0078% |
| 1940 | #762 | 84 | 0.0073% |
| 1939 | #705 | 93 | 0.0085% |
| 1938 | #891 | 63 | 0.0057% |
| 1937 | #820 | 70 | 0.0066% |
| 1936 | #954 | 52 | 0.0050% |
| 1935 | #894 | 60 | 0.0057% |
| 1934 | #776 | 75 | 0.0072% |
| 1933 | #838 | 64 | 0.0063% |
| 1932 | #945 | 56 | 0.0052% |
| 1931 | #927 | 56 | 0.0053% |
| 1930 | #755 | 86 | 0.0076% |
| 1929 | #832 | 73 | 0.0065% |
| 1928 | #890 | 68 | 0.0059% |
| 1927 | #983 | 60 | 0.0050% |
| 1926 | #998 | 56 | 0.0047% |
| 1925 | #1,229 | 40 | 0.0033% |
| 1924 | #1,100 | 51 | 0.0041% |
| 1923 | #1,182 | 43 | 0.0036% |
| 1922 | #1,475 | 31 | 0.0026% |
| 1921 | #1,189 | 42 | 0.0034% |
| 1920 | #1,382 | 33 | 0.0028% |
| 1919 | #1,373 | 32 | 0.0028% |
| 1918 | #1,239 | 37 | 0.0032% |
| 1917 | #1,246 | 34 | 0.0031% |
| 1916 | #1,494 | 25 | 0.0024% |
| 1915 | #1,264 | 31 | 0.0032% |
| 1914 | #1,393 | 21 | 0.0028% |
| 1913 | #1,693 | 13 | 0.0021% |
| 1912 | #1,367 | 16 | 0.0029% |
| 1911 | #1,688 | 9 | 0.0022% |
| 1910 | #1,660 | 9 | 0.0023% |
| 1909 | #1,806 | 7 | 0.0020% |
| 1907 | #1,225 | 11 | 0.0035% |
| 1906 | #1,447 | 8 | 0.0027% |
| 1905 | #1,572 | 7 | 0.0024% |
| 1900 | #1,344 | 9 | 0.0030% |
| 1898 | #1,759 | 5 | 0.0019% |
| 1896 | #1,319 | 7 | 0.0029% |
| 1895 | #1,652 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1893 | #1,313 | 6 | 0.0028% |
| 1892 | #1,502 | 5 | 0.0024% |
| 1887 | #806 | 9 | 0.0062% |
| 1885 | #1,080 | 5 | 0.0038% |
| 1883 | #843 | 6 | 0.0053% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #35 | 6,794 | 0.3978% |
| 2024 | #31 | 7,317 | 0.4266% |
| 2023 | #27 | 7,413 | 0.4339% |
| 2022 | #31 | 7,820 | 0.4483% |
| 2021 | #30 | 7,925 | 0.4533% |
| 2020 | #28 | 8,259 | 0.4788% |
| 2019 | #27 | 8,984 | 0.5010% |
| 2018 | #22 | 9,811 | 0.5404% |
| 2017 | #22 | 10,241 | 0.5535% |
| 2016 | #19 | 11,148 | 0.5876% |
| 2015 | #18 | 11,836 | 0.6177% |
| 2014 | #17 | 12,253 | 0.6380% |
| 2013 | #17 | 12,396 | 0.6554% |
| 2012 | #20 | 12,558 | 0.6621% |
| 2011 | #18 | 13,254 | 0.6980% |
| 2010 | #15 | 14,223 | 0.7414% |
| 2009 | #14 | 15,455 | 0.7793% |
| 2008 | #14 | 16,346 | 0.8013% |
| 2007 | #12 | 17,563 | 0.8463% |
| 2006 | #13 | 17,667 | 0.8597% |
| 2005 | #12 | 18,141 | 0.9083% |
| 2004 | #14 | 18,407 | 0.9274% |
| 2003 | #14 | 18,640 | 0.9437% |
| 2002 | #13 | 18,704 | 0.9634% |
| 2001 | #12 | 19,362 | 0.9966% |
| 2000 | #16 | 19,787 | 1.0075% |
| 1999 | #16 | 20,352 | 1.0600% |
| 1998 | #13 | 20,892 | 1.0931% |
| 1997 | #14 | 21,896 | 1.1615% |
| 1996 | #13 | 23,024 | 1.2155% |
| 1995 | #16 | 23,046 | 1.2106% |
| 1994 | #13 | 24,874 | 1.2875% |
| 1993 | #11 | 27,039 | 1.3787% |
| 1992 | #10 | 28,425 | 1.4231% |
| 1991 | #8 | 30,417 | 1.5056% |
| 1990 | #6 | 33,747 | 1.6430% |
| 1989 | #5 | 35,223 | 1.7604% |
| 1988 | #6 | 35,330 | 1.8457% |
| 1987 | #5 | 36,796 | 1.9709% |
| 1986 | #5 | 37,149 | 2.0173% |
| 1985 | #6 | 38,527 | 2.0845% |
| 1984 | #5 | 38,492 | 2.1326% |
| 1983 | #4 | 39,206 | 2.1870% |
| 1982 | #5 | 40,456 | 2.2294% |
| 1981 | #5 | 40,633 | 2.2683% |
| 1980 | #4 | 41,890 | 2.3479% |
| 1979 | #4 | 42,062 | 2.4431% |
| 1978 | #4 | 40,684 | 2.4777% |
| 1977 | #4 | 40,516 | 2.4655% |
| 1976 | #4 | 39,273 | 2.5028% |
| 1975 | #5 | 39,155 | 2.5076% |
| 1974 | #4 | 41,793 | 2.6578% |
| 1973 | #5 | 41,085 | 2.6359% |
| 1972 | #4 | 46,326 | 2.8565% |
| 1971 | #3 | 53,118 | 3.0035% |
| 1970 | #3 | 61,729 | 3.3217% |
| 1969 | #2 | 63,675 | 3.5606% |
| 1968 | #2 | 63,683 | 3.6641% |
| 1967 | #2 | 66,802 | 3.8307% |
| 1966 | #2 | 66,417 | 3.7240% |
| 1965 | #3 | 67,828 | 3.6461% |
| 1964 | #3 | 75,036 | 3.7654% |
| 1963 | #3 | 78,450 | 3.8630% |
| 1962 | #2 | 81,335 | 3.9316% |
| 1961 | #2 | 84,805 | 3.9928% |
| 1960 | #1 | 85,908 | 4.0296% |
| 1959 | #2 | 83,967 | 3.9338% |
| 1958 | #2 | 82,679 | 3.8957% |
| 1957 | #3 | 82,404 | 3.8198% |
| 1956 | #4 | 81,650 | 3.8599% |
| 1955 | #2 | 86,301 | 4.1898% |
| 1954 | #5 | 79,560 | 3.9023% |
| 1953 | #5 | 76,119 | 3.8594% |
| 1952 | #5 | 71,753 | 3.6916% |
| 1951 | #5 | 64,789 | 3.4410% |
| 1950 | #5 | 60,729 | 3.3921% |
| 1949 | #6 | 59,610 | 3.3604% |
| 1948 | #5 | 56,624 | 3.2271% |
| 1947 | #6 | 57,809 | 3.1597% |
| 1946 | #6 | 46,444 | 2.8598% |
| 1945 | #6 | 37,107 | 2.7572% |
| 1944 | #6 | 37,379 | 2.7427% |
| 1943 | #6 | 37,243 | 2.6094% |
| 1942 | #6 | 35,905 | 2.5997% |
| 1941 | #7 | 30,553 | 2.4874% |
| 1940 | #7 | 27,691 | 2.3889% |
| 1939 | #7 | 25,359 | 2.2911% |
| 1938 | #8 | 22,994 | 2.0731% |
| 1937 | #8 | 20,980 | 1.9669% |
| 1936 | #10 | 17,477 | 1.6850% |
| 1935 | #11 | 15,662 | 1.5040% |
| 1934 | #12 | 14,003 | 1.3561% |
| 1933 | #13 | 12,027 | 1.2130% |
| 1932 | #12 | 12,139 | 1.1626% |
| 1931 | #13 | 11,783 | 1.1333% |
| 1930 | #15 | 12,275 | 1.1186% |
| 1929 | #17 | 11,301 | 1.0507% |
| 1928 | #19 | 9,992 | 0.9021% |
| 1927 | #21 | 9,426 | 0.8364% |
| 1926 | #22 | 9,041 | 0.8141% |
| 1925 | #22 | 8,915 | 0.7989% |
| 1924 | #24 | 8,758 | 0.7732% |
| 1923 | #24 | 8,230 | 0.7508% |
| 1922 | #24 | 7,865 | 0.7228% |
| 1921 | #25 | 7,765 | 0.7050% |
| 1920 | #25 | 7,444 | 0.6994% |
| 1919 | #27 | 6,716 | 0.6852% |
| 1918 | #28 | 6,627 | 0.6539% |
| 1917 | #28 | 6,099 | 0.6590% |
| 1916 | #28 | 5,812 | 0.6530% |
| 1915 | #31 | 5,394 | 0.6357% |
| 1914 | #29 | 4,251 | 0.6492% |
| 1913 | #29 | 3,282 | 0.6403% |
| 1912 | #29 | 2,858 | 0.6647% |
| 1911 | #27 | 1,556 | 0.6886% |
| 1910 | #30 | 1,258 | 0.6478% |
| 1909 | #29 | 1,094 | 0.6671% |
| 1908 | #30 | 1,015 | 0.6577% |
| 1907 | #31 | 945 | 0.6436% |
| 1906 | #31 | 878 | 0.6594% |
| 1905 | #32 | 838 | 0.6334% |
| 1904 | #31 | 817 | 0.6377% |
| 1903 | #33 | 716 | 0.6005% |
| 1902 | #31 | 761 | 0.6204% |
| 1901 | #30 | 672 | 0.6312% |
| 1900 | #32 | 883 | 0.5868% |
| 1899 | #32 | 646 | 0.6082% |
| 1898 | #30 | 815 | 0.6643% |
| 1897 | #29 | 730 | 0.6474% |
| 1896 | #28 | 765 | 0.6398% |
| 1895 | #32 | 707 | 0.6023% |
| 1894 | #29 | 729 | 0.6297% |
| 1893 | #27 | 724 | 0.6446% |
| 1892 | #24 | 813 | 0.6662% |
| 1891 | #26 | 673 | 0.6651% |
| 1890 | #26 | 731 | 0.6584% |
| 1889 | #22 | 757 | 0.6846% |
| 1888 | #21 | 801 | 0.6628% |
| 1887 | #22 | 673 | 0.6636% |
| 1886 | #24 | 674 | 0.6084% |
| 1885 | #22 | 712 | 0.6605% |
| 1884 | #21 | 761 | 0.6650% |
| 1883 | #20 | 734 | 0.7016% |
| 1882 | #19 | 838 | 0.7371% |
| 1881 | #18 | 750 | 0.7445% |
| 1880 | #18 | 869 | 0.7865% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.