Fun Facts About the Name Ellen
- A favorite of earlier generations: Ellen appeared in the U.S. top 100 in 5 separate runs, totaling 77 years. Its last run lasted 24 consecutive years, from 1938 through 1961.
- More than 276 thousand babies named Ellen: U.S. records list 276,023 babies given the name Ellen from 1880 through 2025. Even 745 boys received the name Ellen - about 1 boy for every 370 girls.
What Does the Name Ellen Mean?
Ellen is the English form of Helen, a name that came into English from French Hélène, and before that from Latin Helena and Greek Helenē (Ἑλένη). The customary explanation is that the Greek name is related to helenē, a word for a torch, and it is therefore often glossed as "torch" or "light." Other explanations connect it with hēlios, the Greek word for "sun," or with selas, "brightness." None of these has been proven, and the derivation of the Greek name remains uncertain.
The Greek name is older than the classical stories: it appears in Mycenaean Greek records written in Linear B, which suggests it was in use well before the Trojan War legends took their familiar shape, and it may not be Greek in origin at all. Ellen itself has no separate meaning; it simply carries whatever meaning is assigned to Helen.
Ellen Name History & Origins
The name spread through Greek and then Latin Christian tradition. Helena was the name of the mother of the Roman emperor Constantine, honored as Saint Helena, and that association kept the Latin form in use across medieval Europe.
After the Norman Conquest, French Hélène reinforced forms of the name already current in England. Medieval English records show spellings such as Elen and Ellen, with Ellen becoming the everyday vernacular form while the more learned Helen belonged to Latin texts and was later reintroduced into English. By the later Middle Ages both were familiar, and Ellen remained a common given name in England, Scotland, and Ireland for centuries.
Names that look alike do not always share an origin. The Irish name Eileen is generally traced to Eibhlín, an Irish form of the Norman French name Aveline, rather than to Helen or Ellen, and the English name Eleanor has a separate and much-debated origin of its own. Ellen has also been a frequent name for characters in English literature, as with Ellen "Nelly" Dean, the housekeeper who narrates Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights (1847).
How Popular is the Name Ellen?
Ellen has a rich multi-era history in the U.S. top 100, spanning 77 total years and enjoying its modern revival from 1938 to 1961.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,062 | 230 | 0.0143% |
| 2024 | #1,028 | 244 | 0.0151% |
| 2023 | #1,051 | 239 | 0.0149% |
| 2022 | #1,016 | 255 | 0.0156% |
| 2021 | #920 | 289 | 0.0176% |
| 2020 | #809 | 336 | 0.0208% |
| 2019 | #797 | 347 | 0.0207% |
| 2018 | #765 | 356 | 0.0209% |
| 2017 | #735 | 385 | 0.0223% |
| 2016 | #653 | 450 | 0.0254% |
| 2015 | #701 | 406 | 0.0227% |
| 2014 | #656 | 435 | 0.0244% |
| 2013 | #700 | 403 | 0.0230% |
| 2012 | #743 | 374 | 0.0212% |
| 2011 | #696 | 401 | 0.0228% |
| 2010 | #674 | 430 | 0.0242% |
| 2009 | #699 | 416 | 0.0226% |
| 2008 | #669 | 459 | 0.0243% |
| 2007 | #583 | 513 | 0.0267% |
| 2006 | #543 | 545 | 0.0287% |
| 2005 | #555 | 517 | 0.0280% |
| 2004 | #495 | 594 | 0.0324% |
| 2003 | #449 | 668 | 0.0366% |
| 2002 | #476 | 590 | 0.0328% |
| 2001 | #455 | 609 | 0.0338% |
| 2000 | #449 | 632 | 0.0348% |
| 1999 | #413 | 675 | 0.0381% |
| 1998 | #426 | 622 | 0.0352% |
| 1997 | #345 | 812 | 0.0466% |
| 1996 | #244 | 1,156 | 0.0659% |
| 1995 | #214 | 1,311 | 0.0746% |
| 1994 | #217 | 1,322 | 0.0740% |
| 1993 | #216 | 1,305 | 0.0721% |
| 1992 | #217 | 1,335 | 0.0724% |
| 1991 | #209 | 1,430 | 0.0763% |
| 1990 | #210 | 1,378 | 0.0726% |
| 1989 | #202 | 1,316 | 0.0714% |
| 1988 | #219 | 1,187 | 0.0667% |
| 1987 | #240 | 1,079 | 0.0621% |
| 1986 | #265 | 969 | 0.0565% |
| 1985 | #290 | 854 | 0.0496% |
| 1984 | #263 | 929 | 0.0552% |
| 1983 | #246 | 953 | 0.0570% |
| 1982 | #250 | 1,007 | 0.0595% |
| 1981 | #257 | 958 | 0.0574% |
| 1980 | #260 | 988 | 0.0595% |
| 1979 | #256 | 943 | 0.0587% |
| 1978 | #241 | 1,012 | 0.0661% |
| 1977 | #244 | 1,018 | 0.0664% |
| 1976 | #251 | 941 | 0.0642% |
| 1975 | #238 | 1,021 | 0.0700% |
| 1974 | #234 | 1,088 | 0.0741% |
| 1973 | #241 | 1,073 | 0.0736% |
| 1972 | #235 | 1,176 | 0.0773% |
| 1971 | #218 | 1,391 | 0.0836% |
| 1970 | #188 | 1,759 | 0.1006% |
| 1969 | #169 | 1,895 | 0.1123% |
| 1968 | #156 | 2,102 | 0.1281% |
| 1967 | #138 | 2,525 | 0.1529% |
| 1966 | #130 | 2,805 | 0.1658% |
| 1965 | #117 | 3,251 | 0.1842% |
| 1964 | #119 | 3,532 | 0.1864% |
| 1963 | #112 | 3,944 | 0.2046% |
| 1962 | #109 | 4,113 | 0.2091% |
| 1961 | #97 | 4,844 | 0.2400% |
| 1960 | #94 | 5,135 | 0.2540% |
| 1959 | #91 | 5,397 | 0.2667% |
| 1958 | #93 | 5,156 | 0.2563% |
| 1957 | #85 | 5,588 | 0.2733% |
| 1956 | #84 | 5,432 | 0.2706% |
| 1955 | #81 | 5,470 | 0.2798% |
| 1954 | #77 | 5,456 | 0.2810% |
| 1953 | #76 | 5,537 | 0.2943% |
| 1952 | #70 | 5,842 | 0.3150% |
| 1951 | #68 | 5,945 | 0.3301% |
| 1950 | #66 | 5,567 | 0.3250% |
| 1949 | #64 | 5,505 | 0.3218% |
| 1948 | #67 | 5,289 | 0.3115% |
| 1947 | #61 | 5,856 | 0.3303% |
| 1946 | #58 | 5,237 | 0.3333% |
| 1945 | #61 | 4,189 | 0.3205% |
| 1944 | #63 | 3,998 | 0.3012% |
| 1943 | #67 | 4,152 | 0.2976% |
| 1942 | #64 | 4,197 | 0.3107% |
| 1941 | #67 | 3,664 | 0.3033% |
| 1940 | #74 | 3,318 | 0.2902% |
| 1939 | #80 | 3,005 | 0.2740% |
| 1938 | #89 | 2,805 | 0.2542% |
| 1937 | #102 | 2,499 | 0.2349% |
| 1936 | #99 | 2,398 | 0.2305% |
| 1935 | #95 | 2,434 | 0.2321% |
| 1934 | #95 | 2,455 | 0.2351% |
| 1933 | #104 | 2,201 | 0.2184% |
| 1932 | #104 | 2,370 | 0.2221% |
| 1931 | #99 | 2,450 | 0.2301% |
| 1930 | #100 | 2,522 | 0.2240% |
| 1929 | #97 | 2,567 | 0.2299% |
| 1928 | #98 | 2,682 | 0.2325% |
| 1927 | #93 | 2,867 | 0.2404% |
| 1926 | #100 | 2,768 | 0.2335% |
| 1925 | #101 | 2,794 | 0.2295% |
| 1924 | #99 | 2,949 | 0.2361% |
| 1923 | #103 | 2,671 | 0.2214% |
| 1922 | #95 | 2,953 | 0.2459% |
| 1921 | #95 | 3,064 | 0.2485% |
| 1920 | #92 | 3,076 | 0.2567% |
| 1919 | #92 | 2,929 | 0.2592% |
| 1918 | #92 | 3,030 | 0.2617% |
| 1917 | #90 | 2,855 | 0.2640% |
| 1916 | #87 | 2,838 | 0.2718% |
| 1915 | #88 | 2,581 | 0.2623% |
| 1914 | #86 | 2,039 | 0.2677% |
| 1913 | #88 | 1,579 | 0.2528% |
| 1912 | #86 | 1,449 | 0.2596% |
| 1911 | #84 | 1,162 | 0.2778% |
| 1910 | #88 | 1,038 | 0.2618% |
| 1909 | #86 | 960 | 0.2765% |
| 1908 | #92 | 848 | 0.2537% |
| 1907 | #89 | 855 | 0.2684% |
| 1906 | #80 | 898 | 0.3041% |
| 1905 | #81 | 845 | 0.2898% |
| 1904 | #84 | 774 | 0.2811% |
| 1903 | #85 | 773 | 0.2951% |
| 1902 | #84 | 753 | 0.2851% |
| 1901 | #82 | 711 | 0.2971% |
| 1900 | #82 | 922 | 0.3076% |
| 1899 | #81 | 708 | 0.3038% |
| 1898 | #81 | 786 | 0.3037% |
| 1897 | #77 | 733 | 0.3130% |
| 1896 | #73 | 811 | 0.3409% |
| 1895 | #75 | 746 | 0.3193% |
| 1894 | #72 | 759 | 0.3405% |
| 1893 | #69 | 798 | 0.3748% |
| 1892 | #69 | 760 | 0.3579% |
| 1891 | #69 | 675 | 0.3639% |
| 1890 | #70 | 659 | 0.3462% |
| 1889 | #68 | 653 | 0.3661% |
| 1888 | #68 | 691 | 0.3869% |
| 1887 | #66 | 579 | 0.3966% |
| 1886 | #70 | 551 | 0.3812% |
| 1885 | #64 | 555 | 0.4171% |
| 1884 | #59 | 597 | 0.4627% |
| 1883 | #62 | 500 | 0.4452% |
| 1882 | #64 | 452 | 0.4191% |
| 1881 | #65 | 413 | 0.4491% |
| 1880 | #61 | 411 | 0.4517% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | #7,935 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1990 | #6,635 | 7 | 0.0003% |
| 1989 | #5,302 | 9 | 0.0004% |
| 1988 | #7,624 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1987 | #7,299 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1986 | #5,002 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1984 | #5,135 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1983 | #6,550 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1979 | #6,342 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1976 | #3,806 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 1974 | #4,807 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1968 | #3,457 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1967 | #3,673 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1966 | #3,642 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1965 | #2,667 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1964 | #2,916 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1963 | #1,988 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1962 | #2,136 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1961 | #2,591 | 11 | 0.0005% |
| 1960 | #2,350 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1959 | #2,575 | 11 | 0.0005% |
| 1958 | #2,405 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1957 | #2,698 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1956 | #2,305 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1955 | #2,828 | 9 | 0.0004% |
| 1954 | #2,144 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1953 | #2,124 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1952 | #2,572 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1951 | #2,416 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1950 | #2,355 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1949 | #2,857 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1948 | #2,496 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1947 | #1,708 | 20 | 0.0011% |
| 1946 | #1,974 | 14 | 0.0009% |
| 1945 | #2,448 | 9 | 0.0007% |
| 1944 | #1,762 | 16 | 0.0012% |
| 1943 | #1,937 | 15 | 0.0011% |
| 1942 | #1,599 | 20 | 0.0014% |
| 1941 | #1,462 | 22 | 0.0018% |
| 1940 | #2,111 | 12 | 0.0010% |
| 1939 | #1,903 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1938 | #2,110 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1937 | #1,646 | 18 | 0.0017% |
| 1936 | #1,904 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1935 | #2,289 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1934 | #2,165 | 12 | 0.0012% |
| 1933 | #2,261 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1931 | #2,135 | 13 | 0.0013% |
| 1930 | #2,338 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1929 | #1,877 | 17 | 0.0016% |
| 1928 | #3,166 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1927 | #2,762 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1926 | #2,780 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1925 | #2,228 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1924 | #3,612 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1923 | #3,023 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1922 | #3,090 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1921 | #3,049 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1920 | #3,590 | 7 | 0.0007% |
| 1919 | #3,857 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| 1918 | #3,856 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| 1917 | #2,015 | 15 | 0.0016% |
| 1915 | #3,524 | 6 | 0.0007% |
| 1912 | #1,782 | 9 | 0.0021% |
| 1911 | #1,215 | 9 | 0.0040% |
| 1902 | #1,187 | 5 | 0.0041% |
| 1897 | #1,109 | 5 | 0.0044% |
| 1896 | #1,020 | 6 | 0.0050% |
| 1895 | #1,129 | 5 | 0.0043% |
| 1894 | #990 | 6 | 0.0052% |
| 1885 | #785 | 7 | 0.0065% |
| 1884 | #1,013 | 5 | 0.0044% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.