Fun Facts About the Name Natalia
- A favorite of earlier generations: Natalia appeared in the U.S. top 100 in 3 separate runs, totaling 6 years. Its last run lasted 4 consecutive years, from 2020 through 2023.
- More than 85 thousand babies named Natalia: U.S. records list 85,169 babies given the name Natalia from 1880 through 2025. Even 52 boys received the name Natalia - about 1 boy for every 1,637 girls.
What Does the Name Natalia Mean?
Natalia is the feminine form of the Late Latin name Natalis, which comes from the Latin adjective natalis, meaning "of birth" or "belonging to a birthday." The adjective is built on natus, the past participle of the verb nasci, "to be born." In Christian Latin, the phrase natale Domini ("the birth of the Lord") was used for Christmas Day, and from that association the name is traditionally understood to mean "born on Christmas Day" or "of Christmas." That Christmas sense is a customary reading built on the literal meaning "of birth"; the underlying etymology is the Latin word for birth, not a separate root.
Natalia Name History & Origins
Natalia is a Late Latin name, the feminine counterpart of the masculine Natalis, and it belongs to Christian antiquity. Its best-known early association is Saint Natalia, remembered as the wife of Saint Adrian of Nicomedia; the two are venerated as martyrs in both the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches. Through that veneration the name took hold in the Greek-speaking Christian East and then passed into the Slavic world, where it became standard as Russian Наталья (Natalya) and Наталия (Natalia), Ukrainian Наталя, and Bulgarian Наталия. The Russian short form Наташа (Natasha) later became familiar well beyond Russia.
In Western Europe the name developed from the same Latin source, giving Italian Natalia, Spanish Natalia, Polish Natalia, and French Nathalie. English received it along two routes: the Latin spelling Natalia and the French-derived Natalie. The Natalia spelling is standard in the Spanish-, Italian-, and Polish-speaking worlds and is also widely used in English.
How Popular is the Name Natalia?
Natalia recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 2006. People named Amelia who were born during its modern resurgence from 2020 through 2023 turn 3-6 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #144 | 2,028 | 0.1262% |
| 2024 | #105 | 2,498 | 0.1548% |
| 2023 | #96 | 2,722 | 0.1698% |
| 2022 | #79 | 3,003 | 0.1832% |
| 2021 | #79 | 3,203 | 0.1953% |
| 2020 | #85 | 3,076 | 0.1904% |
| 2019 | #103 | 2,736 | 0.1631% |
| 2018 | #114 | 2,627 | 0.1545% |
| 2017 | #119 | 2,613 | 0.1514% |
| 2016 | #111 | 2,828 | 0.1596% |
| 2015 | #118 | 2,701 | 0.1513% |
| 2014 | #111 | 2,798 | 0.1567% |
| 2013 | #121 | 2,634 | 0.1501% |
| 2012 | #119 | 2,595 | 0.1474% |
| 2011 | #108 | 2,801 | 0.1593% |
| 2010 | #98 | 3,046 | 0.1714% |
| 2009 | #103 | 3,116 | 0.1696% |
| 2008 | #107 | 3,242 | 0.1715% |
| 2007 | #109 | 3,072 | 0.1598% |
| 2006 | #94 | 3,587 | 0.1887% |
| 2005 | #123 | 2,653 | 0.1436% |
| 2004 | #142 | 2,293 | 0.1249% |
| 2003 | #148 | 2,256 | 0.1235% |
| 2002 | #173 | 1,882 | 0.1047% |
| 2001 | #161 | 2,007 | 0.1115% |
| 2000 | #220 | 1,424 | 0.0784% |
| 1999 | #249 | 1,272 | 0.0717% |
| 1998 | #269 | 1,159 | 0.0656% |
| 1997 | #308 | 944 | 0.0542% |
| 1996 | #336 | 830 | 0.0473% |
| 1995 | #345 | 760 | 0.0432% |
| 1994 | #376 | 683 | 0.0382% |
| 1993 | #470 | 540 | 0.0299% |
| 1992 | #366 | 702 | 0.0381% |
| 1991 | #448 | 573 | 0.0306% |
| 1990 | #478 | 513 | 0.0270% |
| 1989 | #489 | 480 | 0.0260% |
| 1988 | #465 | 486 | 0.0273% |
| 1987 | #472 | 463 | 0.0266% |
| 1986 | #544 | 374 | 0.0218% |
| 1985 | #534 | 373 | 0.0217% |
| 1984 | #547 | 347 | 0.0206% |
| 1983 | #509 | 381 | 0.0228% |
| 1982 | #542 | 357 | 0.0211% |
| 1981 | #588 | 314 | 0.0188% |
| 1980 | #616 | 299 | 0.0180% |
| 1979 | #613 | 288 | 0.0179% |
| 1978 | #752 | 206 | 0.0134% |
| 1977 | #951 | 146 | 0.0095% |
| 1976 | #884 | 150 | 0.0102% |
| 1975 | #893 | 148 | 0.0102% |
| 1974 | #1,002 | 121 | 0.0082% |
| 1973 | #1,051 | 111 | 0.0076% |
| 1972 | #1,201 | 90 | 0.0059% |
| 1971 | #1,304 | 84 | 0.0050% |
| 1970 | #1,200 | 95 | 0.0054% |
| 1969 | #1,525 | 61 | 0.0036% |
| 1968 | #1,445 | 62 | 0.0038% |
| 1967 | #1,453 | 59 | 0.0036% |
| 1966 | #1,377 | 64 | 0.0038% |
| 1965 | #1,568 | 51 | 0.0029% |
| 1964 | #1,544 | 55 | 0.0029% |
| 1963 | #1,856 | 40 | 0.0021% |
| 1962 | #1,506 | 56 | 0.0028% |
| 1961 | #1,783 | 42 | 0.0021% |
| 1960 | #1,573 | 51 | 0.0025% |
| 1959 | #1,636 | 45 | 0.0022% |
| 1958 | #1,759 | 39 | 0.0019% |
| 1957 | #1,768 | 38 | 0.0019% |
| 1956 | #1,785 | 36 | 0.0018% |
| 1955 | #2,050 | 28 | 0.0014% |
| 1954 | #2,353 | 22 | 0.0011% |
| 1953 | #2,057 | 26 | 0.0014% |
| 1952 | #2,185 | 23 | 0.0012% |
| 1951 | #1,795 | 30 | 0.0017% |
| 1950 | #1,545 | 37 | 0.0022% |
| 1949 | #1,870 | 27 | 0.0016% |
| 1948 | #2,109 | 22 | 0.0013% |
| 1947 | #1,978 | 25 | 0.0014% |
| 1946 | #1,956 | 23 | 0.0015% |
| 1945 | #1,648 | 26 | 0.0020% |
| 1944 | #1,356 | 36 | 0.0027% |
| 1943 | #1,549 | 30 | 0.0022% |
| 1942 | #1,522 | 30 | 0.0022% |
| 1941 | #1,564 | 26 | 0.0022% |
| 1940 | #1,829 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1939 | #1,259 | 35 | 0.0032% |
| 1938 | #1,468 | 27 | 0.0024% |
| 1937 | #1,156 | 39 | 0.0037% |
| 1936 | #1,198 | 36 | 0.0035% |
| 1935 | #1,159 | 38 | 0.0036% |
| 1934 | #970 | 51 | 0.0049% |
| 1933 | #1,132 | 39 | 0.0039% |
| 1932 | #1,123 | 41 | 0.0038% |
| 1931 | #1,008 | 49 | 0.0046% |
| 1930 | #1,027 | 52 | 0.0046% |
| 1929 | #859 | 69 | 0.0062% |
| 1928 | #851 | 73 | 0.0063% |
| 1927 | #830 | 79 | 0.0066% |
| 1926 | #922 | 66 | 0.0056% |
| 1925 | #911 | 67 | 0.0055% |
| 1924 | #1,218 | 43 | 0.0034% |
| 1923 | #1,189 | 43 | 0.0036% |
| 1922 | #1,356 | 35 | 0.0029% |
| 1921 | #1,361 | 35 | 0.0028% |
| 1920 | #1,225 | 40 | 0.0033% |
| 1919 | #1,311 | 35 | 0.0031% |
| 1918 | #2,173 | 17 | 0.0015% |
| 1917 | #1,062 | 45 | 0.0042% |
| 1916 | #1,727 | 21 | 0.0020% |
| 1915 | #1,859 | 18 | 0.0018% |
| 1914 | #1,714 | 16 | 0.0021% |
| 1913 | #1,391 | 18 | 0.0029% |
| 1912 | #1,592 | 13 | 0.0023% |
| 1911 | #1,099 | 17 | 0.0041% |
| 1910 | #2,078 | 7 | 0.0018% |
| 1909 | #2,448 | 5 | 0.0014% |
| 1908 | #1,409 | 10 | 0.0030% |
| 1907 | #1,600 | 8 | 0.0025% |
| 1906 | #1,516 | 8 | 0.0027% |
| 1905 | #2,145 | 5 | 0.0017% |
| 1903 | #1,533 | 7 | 0.0027% |
| 1902 | #1,551 | 7 | 0.0027% |
| 1900 | #1,395 | 9 | 0.0030% |
| 1899 | #1,532 | 6 | 0.0026% |
| 1896 | #1,752 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1893 | #1,003 | 10 | 0.0047% |
| 1892 | #1,405 | 6 | 0.0028% |
| 1890 | #1,169 | 7 | 0.0037% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | #13,725 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2010 | #13,659 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2005 | #8,848 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2004 | #7,981 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2002 | #10,262 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1992 | #8,137 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1981 | #5,309 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1933 | #3,529 | 6 | 0.0006% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.