Fun Facts About the Name Amber
- An established favorite: Amber held a place in the U.S. top 100 for 31 consecutive years, from 1974 through 2004.
- More than 375 thousand babies named Amber: U.S. records list 375,658 babies given the name Amber from 1880 through 2025. Even 979 boys received the name Amber - about 1 boy for every 383 girls.
What Does the Name Amber Mean?
Amber is the English word for fossilized tree resin, the hard, translucent substance ranging from pale yellow to orange-brown that is cut and polished for jewelry. The given name is simply this noun, so its literal meaning is the substance itself. English took the word from Old French ambre, which came through Medieval Latin ambar from Arabic ʿanbar (عنبر). In Arabic, ʿanbar meant ambergris, the waxy material formed in the digestive tract of sperm whales and used in perfume; Arabic uses a separate word, kahramān, for fossil resin. Medieval European writers often merged the two substances under one word, so ambre and its relatives came to name both.
Other languages had their own terms, and these are not ancestors of the English word. Greek called fossil resin ēlektron, the source of the English word electricity, because rubbing amber produces a static charge; Latin called it succinum. Later symbolic readings of the name attach warmth, sunlight, and preservation to amber's golden color, but these are associations rather than part of the word's etymology.
Amber Name History & Origins
Amber came into use as a given name in the English-speaking world in the 19th century, when names taken from gemstones, minerals, flowers, and natural objects - Ruby, Pearl, Beryl, Hazel, and others - became common. Because the name is the ordinary English noun, it spread with English rather than by translation of a name from another language, and it has been used mainly for girls. The same substance and word appear in other European languages as separate given names, such as Italian Ambra and Spanish Ámbar, but those are independent formations from the same Latin and Arabic root.
The color sense of the word, a warm yellow-orange, supported the name's use as a color name as well as a name for the resin. In modern literature, Kathleen Winsor's 1944 novel Forever Amber used the name for its heroine, and Roger Zelazny's The Chronicles of Amber, beginning in 1970, used Amber as the name of a realm rather than a character. Both are later uses of a word already in service as a name, not the name's origin.
How Popular is the Name Amber?
Amber remained among the top 100 girl names in the U.S. from 1974 to 2004. Its highest annual birth count was in 1986, and people born that year turn 40 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #520 | 576 | 0.0358% |
| 2024 | #541 | 558 | 0.0346% |
| 2023 | #574 | 519 | 0.0324% |
| 2022 | #540 | 569 | 0.0347% |
| 2021 | #534 | 579 | 0.0353% |
| 2020 | #510 | 594 | 0.0368% |
| 2019 | #480 | 653 | 0.0389% |
| 2018 | #469 | 665 | 0.0391% |
| 2017 | #402 | 782 | 0.0453% |
| 2016 | #375 | 871 | 0.0492% |
| 2015 | #334 | 978 | 0.0548% |
| 2014 | #305 | 1,064 | 0.0596% |
| 2013 | #284 | 1,114 | 0.0635% |
| 2012 | #261 | 1,237 | 0.0703% |
| 2011 | #259 | 1,236 | 0.0703% |
| 2010 | #222 | 1,419 | 0.0798% |
| 2009 | #184 | 1,775 | 0.0966% |
| 2008 | #165 | 2,063 | 0.1091% |
| 2007 | #145 | 2,405 | 0.1251% |
| 2006 | #136 | 2,588 | 0.1361% |
| 2005 | #101 | 3,146 | 0.1703% |
| 2004 | #87 | 3,639 | 0.1982% |
| 2003 | #74 | 4,123 | 0.2257% |
| 2002 | #65 | 4,723 | 0.2629% |
| 2001 | #51 | 5,572 | 0.3095% |
| 2000 | #47 | 6,181 | 0.3404% |
| 1999 | #41 | 6,841 | 0.3857% |
| 1998 | #37 | 7,930 | 0.4488% |
| 1997 | #29 | 8,914 | 0.5121% |
| 1996 | #27 | 9,771 | 0.5574% |
| 1995 | #22 | 10,965 | 0.6235% |
| 1994 | #21 | 12,343 | 0.6912% |
| 1993 | #17 | 14,065 | 0.7775% |
| 1992 | #19 | 13,917 | 0.7548% |
| 1991 | #16 | 14,993 | 0.7996% |
| 1990 | #15 | 15,866 | 0.8357% |
| 1989 | #14 | 16,760 | 0.9091% |
| 1988 | #15 | 16,676 | 0.9364% |
| 1987 | #15 | 16,749 | 0.9633% |
| 1986 | #13 | 16,955 | 0.9883% |
| 1985 | #16 | 15,506 | 0.9011% |
| 1984 | #18 | 15,369 | 0.9127% |
| 1983 | #17 | 14,893 | 0.8914% |
| 1982 | #18 | 14,677 | 0.8667% |
| 1981 | #20 | 13,813 | 0.8281% |
| 1980 | #22 | 12,553 | 0.7560% |
| 1979 | #22 | 11,080 | 0.6902% |
| 1978 | #30 | 8,174 | 0.5336% |
| 1977 | #33 | 7,207 | 0.4701% |
| 1976 | #49 | 5,646 | 0.3854% |
| 1975 | #59 | 4,683 | 0.3212% |
| 1974 | #92 | 3,273 | 0.2230% |
| 1973 | #130 | 2,180 | 0.1495% |
| 1972 | #161 | 1,812 | 0.1191% |
| 1971 | #180 | 1,721 | 0.1034% |
| 1970 | #243 | 1,289 | 0.0737% |
| 1969 | #277 | 1,026 | 0.0608% |
| 1968 | #293 | 887 | 0.0541% |
| 1967 | #358 | 627 | 0.0380% |
| 1966 | #400 | 528 | 0.0312% |
| 1965 | #404 | 525 | 0.0297% |
| 1964 | #445 | 479 | 0.0253% |
| 1963 | #484 | 401 | 0.0208% |
| 1962 | #498 | 377 | 0.0192% |
| 1961 | #535 | 335 | 0.0166% |
| 1960 | #589 | 282 | 0.0139% |
| 1959 | #694 | 208 | 0.0103% |
| 1958 | #783 | 163 | 0.0081% |
| 1957 | #869 | 137 | 0.0067% |
| 1956 | #908 | 122 | 0.0061% |
| 1955 | #852 | 129 | 0.0066% |
| 1954 | #933 | 107 | 0.0055% |
| 1953 | #954 | 98 | 0.0052% |
| 1952 | #887 | 108 | 0.0058% |
| 1951 | #946 | 96 | 0.0053% |
| 1950 | #972 | 87 | 0.0051% |
| 1949 | #918 | 93 | 0.0054% |
| 1948 | #924 | 88 | 0.0052% |
| 1947 | #951 | 87 | 0.0049% |
| 1946 | #834 | 98 | 0.0062% |
| 1945 | #954 | 65 | 0.0050% |
| 1944 | #1,665 | 25 | 0.0019% |
| 1943 | #1,834 | 22 | 0.0016% |
| 1942 | #1,982 | 19 | 0.0014% |
| 1941 | #1,811 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1940 | #1,792 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1939 | #1,799 | 19 | 0.0017% |
| 1938 | #1,704 | 21 | 0.0019% |
| 1937 | #2,453 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1936 | #1,594 | 22 | 0.0021% |
| 1935 | #1,721 | 20 | 0.0019% |
| 1934 | #1,373 | 28 | 0.0027% |
| 1933 | #2,545 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1932 | #2,136 | 15 | 0.0014% |
| 1931 | #1,596 | 23 | 0.0022% |
| 1930 | #1,749 | 21 | 0.0019% |
| 1929 | #1,558 | 25 | 0.0022% |
| 1928 | #1,254 | 37 | 0.0032% |
| 1927 | #1,622 | 26 | 0.0022% |
| 1926 | #1,515 | 29 | 0.0024% |
| 1925 | #1,348 | 35 | 0.0029% |
| 1924 | #1,612 | 28 | 0.0022% |
| 1923 | #1,736 | 24 | 0.0020% |
| 1922 | #1,368 | 34 | 0.0028% |
| 1921 | #1,258 | 38 | 0.0031% |
| 1920 | #1,550 | 28 | 0.0023% |
| 1919 | #1,350 | 33 | 0.0029% |
| 1918 | #1,451 | 29 | 0.0025% |
| 1917 | #1,127 | 40 | 0.0037% |
| 1916 | #949 | 52 | 0.0050% |
| 1915 | #1,075 | 39 | 0.0040% |
| 1914 | #956 | 38 | 0.0050% |
| 1913 | #901 | 35 | 0.0056% |
| 1912 | #1,218 | 19 | 0.0034% |
| 1911 | #1,244 | 14 | 0.0033% |
| 1910 | #813 | 28 | 0.0071% |
| 1909 | #936 | 19 | 0.0055% |
| 1908 | #882 | 20 | 0.0060% |
| 1907 | #762 | 24 | 0.0075% |
| 1906 | #919 | 16 | 0.0054% |
| 1905 | #872 | 18 | 0.0062% |
| 1904 | #641 | 29 | 0.0105% |
| 1903 | #1,445 | 7 | 0.0027% |
| 1902 | #1,221 | 9 | 0.0034% |
| 1901 | #921 | 13 | 0.0054% |
| 1900 | #971 | 15 | 0.0050% |
| 1899 | #985 | 11 | 0.0047% |
| 1898 | #888 | 15 | 0.0058% |
| 1897 | #829 | 15 | 0.0064% |
| 1896 | #790 | 17 | 0.0071% |
| 1895 | #789 | 16 | 0.0068% |
| 1894 | #909 | 12 | 0.0054% |
| 1893 | #768 | 15 | 0.0070% |
| 1892 | #961 | 10 | 0.0047% |
| 1891 | #894 | 10 | 0.0054% |
| 1890 | #873 | 10 | 0.0053% |
| 1889 | #953 | 8 | 0.0045% |
| 1888 | #898 | 9 | 0.0050% |
| 1887 | #793 | 9 | 0.0062% |
| 1884 | #931 | 6 | 0.0047% |
| 1881 | #835 | 5 | 0.0054% |
| 1880 | #583 | 9 | 0.0099% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | #11,066 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2006 | #10,744 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2005 | #7,124 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 2004 | #4,135 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 2003 | #9,628 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2002 | #10,750 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2001 | #9,297 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2000 | #6,336 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1999 | #5,669 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1998 | #5,857 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1997 | #4,068 | 16 | 0.0008% |
| 1996 | #3,551 | 19 | 0.0010% |
| 1995 | #3,196 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 1994 | #3,332 | 20 | 0.0010% |
| 1993 | #2,698 | 26 | 0.0013% |
| 1992 | #2,838 | 24 | 0.0012% |
| 1991 | #2,295 | 31 | 0.0015% |
| 1990 | #1,809 | 43 | 0.0021% |
| 1989 | #1,392 | 62 | 0.0031% |
| 1988 | #1,309 | 62 | 0.0032% |
| 1987 | #1,338 | 55 | 0.0029% |
| 1986 | #1,335 | 54 | 0.0029% |
| 1985 | #1,452 | 46 | 0.0025% |
| 1984 | #1,323 | 50 | 0.0028% |
| 1983 | #1,347 | 48 | 0.0027% |
| 1982 | #1,343 | 49 | 0.0027% |
| 1981 | #1,236 | 55 | 0.0031% |
| 1980 | #1,410 | 45 | 0.0025% |
| 1979 | #1,903 | 28 | 0.0016% |
| 1978 | #1,651 | 33 | 0.0020% |
| 1977 | #1,908 | 26 | 0.0016% |
| 1976 | #2,951 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1975 | #2,288 | 19 | 0.0012% |
| 1974 | #2,951 | 12 | 0.0008% |
| 1973 | #3,706 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1972 | #3,158 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1971 | #3,672 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1961 | #4,081 | 5 | 0.0002% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.