Fun Facts About the Name Sam
- An established favorite: Sam held a place in the U.S. top 100 for 47 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1926.
- More than 128 thousand babies named Sam: U.S. records list 128,799 babies given the name Sam from 1880 through 2025. Even 1,576 girls received the name Sam - about 1 girl for every 81 boys.
What Does the Name Sam Mean?
Sam is most commonly an English short form of Samuel, a name from the Hebrew Bible. The Hebrew form is Shmu'el (שְׁמוּאֵל), and its meaning is not fully certain. One long-standing explanation derives it from shama ("to hear") and El ("God"), giving "God has heard." Another connects the first element to shem ("name"), giving "name of God." The biblical story of Hannah naming Samuel plays on the idea of asking God for a child, which is a traditional rather than strictly linguistic explanation.
Sam can also be a short form of Samson, from Hebrew Shimshon (שִׁמְשׁוֹן). That name is usually linked to shemesh ("sun"), so the traditional meaning is "sun" or "of the sun." When Sam stands for Samson, it carries that background rather than Samuel's. Samantha, a feminine name of uncertain origin often treated as a feminine form of Samuel, is another source of the short form Sam in modern use.
Sam Name History & Origins
The name Samuel appears in the Hebrew Bible as the prophet who anoints Saul and David. Greek-speaking Jews rendered it Samouēl, and the Latin Bible has Samuel; these forms passed into European languages. In medieval Europe, Samuel was a familiar biblical name, though it was not among the most common. It gained wider use among Protestants after the Reformation, particularly in the 17th century, when Old Testament names became popular with Puritans. The familiar short form Sam developed in English speech alongside the full name.
Sam also became a standard short form of Samson, the biblical strongman whose Hebrew name is Shimshon. Because Samson's name is associated with the sun, the short form can carry that association in contexts where it refers to him. In later English and American usage, Sam has also been used as a given name in its own right, not only as a nickname. It is also used as a feminine short form, especially of Samantha.
Famous literary uses include Sam Weller in Charles Dickens's The Pickwick Papers and Sam Gamgee in J. R. R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings. These are characters who bear an already existing familiar name; they are not the source of it.
How Popular is the Name Sam?
Sam remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1926. Its highest annual birth count was in 1918, and people born that year turn 108 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #5,370 | 24 | 0.0015% |
| 2024 | #6,572 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 2023 | #9,492 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 2022 | #6,663 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 2021 | #6,372 | 19 | 0.0012% |
| 2020 | #8,857 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 2019 | #8,070 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2018 | #8,529 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 2017 | #9,252 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 2016 | #7,176 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 2015 | #9,390 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 2014 | #8,878 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 2013 | #8,503 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2012 | #19,052 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2011 | #8,547 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2010 | #9,691 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 2009 | #8,383 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 2008 | #6,525 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 2007 | #12,473 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2006 | #7,786 | 16 | 0.0008% |
| 2005 | #9,347 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 2004 | #13,909 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2001 | #9,957 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2000 | #14,664 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1999 | #14,080 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1997 | #15,633 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1996 | #10,342 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1993 | #7,379 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1991 | #11,237 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1990 | #14,744 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1989 | #14,035 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1988 | #11,445 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1987 | #10,970 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1986 | #8,329 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1985 | #6,360 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1984 | #10,087 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1983 | #6,136 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 1982 | #8,986 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1980 | #5,826 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1979 | #8,776 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1978 | #8,338 | 7 | 0.0005% |
| 1977 | #10,896 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1975 | #6,346 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 1974 | #8,494 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1973 | #8,192 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1972 | #8,026 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1971 | #5,443 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1970 | #4,436 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1969 | #5,861 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1968 | #5,539 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1967 | #4,247 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 1966 | #3,512 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1965 | #3,238 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1964 | #4,930 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1963 | #4,834 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1962 | #2,589 | 23 | 0.0012% |
| 1961 | #3,164 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1960 | #3,185 | 16 | 0.0008% |
| 1959 | #3,592 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1958 | #3,517 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1957 | #4,159 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1956 | #3,868 | 11 | 0.0005% |
| 1955 | #3,749 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1954 | #3,133 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1953 | #3,442 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1952 | #3,749 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1951 | #2,791 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 1950 | #3,629 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1949 | #4,181 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1948 | #3,562 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1947 | #4,286 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1946 | #3,938 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1945 | #3,966 | 7 | 0.0005% |
| 1944 | #3,110 | 10 | 0.0008% |
| 1943 | #2,432 | 15 | 0.0011% |
| 1942 | #2,190 | 17 | 0.0013% |
| 1941 | #2,647 | 12 | 0.0010% |
| 1940 | #2,927 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1939 | #3,112 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1938 | #2,207 | 15 | 0.0014% |
| 1937 | #2,433 | 13 | 0.0012% |
| 1936 | #1,790 | 19 | 0.0018% |
| 1935 | #2,901 | 10 | 0.0010% |
| 1934 | #3,751 | 7 | 0.0007% |
| 1933 | #1,894 | 18 | 0.0018% |
| 1932 | #1,940 | 18 | 0.0017% |
| 1931 | #1,795 | 20 | 0.0019% |
| 1930 | #2,094 | 17 | 0.0015% |
| 1929 | #1,414 | 30 | 0.0027% |
| 1928 | #1,392 | 32 | 0.0028% |
| 1927 | #1,818 | 23 | 0.0019% |
| 1926 | #1,875 | 22 | 0.0019% |
| 1925 | #1,738 | 25 | 0.0021% |
| 1924 | #1,563 | 30 | 0.0024% |
| 1923 | #1,775 | 24 | 0.0020% |
| 1922 | #1,607 | 28 | 0.0023% |
| 1921 | #1,718 | 26 | 0.0021% |
| 1920 | #1,804 | 23 | 0.0019% |
| 1919 | #1,295 | 36 | 0.0032% |
| 1918 | #1,745 | 23 | 0.0020% |
| 1917 | #2,408 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1916 | #1,626 | 23 | 0.0022% |
| 1915 | #1,395 | 27 | 0.0027% |
| 1914 | #1,595 | 18 | 0.0024% |
| 1913 | #1,170 | 23 | 0.0037% |
| 1912 | #1,610 | 13 | 0.0023% |
| 1911 | #2,422 | 6 | 0.0014% |
| 1910 | #1,326 | 13 | 0.0033% |
| 1909 | #1,740 | 8 | 0.0023% |
| 1908 | #2,381 | 5 | 0.0015% |
| 1907 | #1,622 | 8 | 0.0025% |
| 1906 | #1,921 | 6 | 0.0020% |
| 1905 | #1,518 | 8 | 0.0027% |
| 1904 | #2,132 | 5 | 0.0018% |
| 1902 | #1,570 | 7 | 0.0027% |
| 1901 | #1,447 | 7 | 0.0029% |
| 1900 | #1,215 | 11 | 0.0037% |
| 1897 | #1,765 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1895 | #1,777 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1894 | #1,221 | 8 | 0.0036% |
| 1893 | #1,269 | 7 | 0.0033% |
| 1890 | #1,185 | 7 | 0.0037% |
| 1889 | #1,255 | 6 | 0.0034% |
| 1888 | #1,450 | 5 | 0.0028% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #647 | 428 | 0.0251% |
| 2024 | #651 | 423 | 0.0247% |
| 2023 | #675 | 403 | 0.0236% |
| 2022 | #658 | 418 | 0.0240% |
| 2021 | #659 | 412 | 0.0236% |
| 2020 | #655 | 402 | 0.0233% |
| 2019 | #618 | 442 | 0.0246% |
| 2018 | #604 | 453 | 0.0250% |
| 2017 | #538 | 527 | 0.0285% |
| 2016 | #580 | 478 | 0.0252% |
| 2015 | #547 | 523 | 0.0273% |
| 2014 | #534 | 523 | 0.0272% |
| 2013 | #553 | 480 | 0.0254% |
| 2012 | #518 | 510 | 0.0269% |
| 2011 | #483 | 545 | 0.0287% |
| 2010 | #472 | 550 | 0.0287% |
| 2009 | #470 | 581 | 0.0293% |
| 2008 | #458 | 608 | 0.0298% |
| 2007 | #453 | 614 | 0.0296% |
| 2006 | #461 | 586 | 0.0285% |
| 2005 | #460 | 557 | 0.0279% |
| 2004 | #438 | 593 | 0.0299% |
| 2003 | #436 | 577 | 0.0292% |
| 2002 | #442 | 561 | 0.0289% |
| 2001 | #438 | 554 | 0.0285% |
| 2000 | #460 | 517 | 0.0263% |
| 1999 | #460 | 498 | 0.0259% |
| 1998 | #458 | 492 | 0.0257% |
| 1997 | #458 | 484 | 0.0257% |
| 1996 | #428 | 527 | 0.0278% |
| 1995 | #404 | 569 | 0.0299% |
| 1994 | #414 | 554 | 0.0287% |
| 1993 | #415 | 561 | 0.0286% |
| 1992 | #401 | 575 | 0.0288% |
| 1991 | #384 | 591 | 0.0293% |
| 1990 | #397 | 586 | 0.0285% |
| 1989 | #415 | 503 | 0.0251% |
| 1988 | #413 | 479 | 0.0250% |
| 1987 | #393 | 483 | 0.0259% |
| 1986 | #441 | 381 | 0.0207% |
| 1985 | #461 | 348 | 0.0188% |
| 1984 | #444 | 363 | 0.0201% |
| 1983 | #434 | 360 | 0.0201% |
| 1982 | #433 | 374 | 0.0206% |
| 1981 | #426 | 384 | 0.0214% |
| 1980 | #429 | 365 | 0.0205% |
| 1979 | #410 | 374 | 0.0217% |
| 1978 | #378 | 417 | 0.0254% |
| 1977 | #418 | 357 | 0.0217% |
| 1976 | #388 | 398 | 0.0254% |
| 1975 | #377 | 420 | 0.0269% |
| 1974 | #366 | 437 | 0.0278% |
| 1973 | #351 | 476 | 0.0305% |
| 1972 | #346 | 497 | 0.0306% |
| 1971 | #340 | 541 | 0.0306% |
| 1970 | #321 | 600 | 0.0323% |
| 1969 | #318 | 583 | 0.0326% |
| 1968 | #320 | 567 | 0.0326% |
| 1967 | #299 | 607 | 0.0348% |
| 1966 | #285 | 678 | 0.0380% |
| 1965 | #267 | 774 | 0.0416% |
| 1964 | #248 | 955 | 0.0479% |
| 1963 | #236 | 1,016 | 0.0500% |
| 1962 | #236 | 1,071 | 0.0518% |
| 1961 | #229 | 1,192 | 0.0561% |
| 1960 | #228 | 1,209 | 0.0567% |
| 1959 | #214 | 1,298 | 0.0608% |
| 1958 | #225 | 1,177 | 0.0555% |
| 1957 | #232 | 1,069 | 0.0496% |
| 1956 | #238 | 951 | 0.0450% |
| 1955 | #239 | 874 | 0.0424% |
| 1954 | #238 | 873 | 0.0428% |
| 1953 | #229 | 880 | 0.0446% |
| 1952 | #215 | 940 | 0.0484% |
| 1951 | #201 | 1,034 | 0.0549% |
| 1950 | #207 | 956 | 0.0534% |
| 1949 | #188 | 1,104 | 0.0622% |
| 1948 | #176 | 1,238 | 0.0706% |
| 1947 | #169 | 1,416 | 0.0774% |
| 1946 | #164 | 1,304 | 0.0803% |
| 1945 | #161 | 1,137 | 0.0845% |
| 1944 | #157 | 1,212 | 0.0889% |
| 1943 | #153 | 1,322 | 0.0926% |
| 1942 | #152 | 1,280 | 0.0927% |
| 1941 | #150 | 1,191 | 0.0970% |
| 1940 | #150 | 1,147 | 0.0990% |
| 1939 | #145 | 1,121 | 0.1013% |
| 1938 | #141 | 1,162 | 0.1048% |
| 1937 | #132 | 1,213 | 0.1137% |
| 1936 | #131 | 1,236 | 0.1192% |
| 1935 | #126 | 1,364 | 0.1310% |
| 1934 | #127 | 1,321 | 0.1279% |
| 1933 | #121 | 1,351 | 0.1363% |
| 1932 | #120 | 1,454 | 0.1393% |
| 1931 | #118 | 1,460 | 0.1404% |
| 1930 | #110 | 1,668 | 0.1520% |
| 1929 | #105 | 1,730 | 0.1608% |
| 1928 | #109 | 1,759 | 0.1588% |
| 1927 | #102 | 1,904 | 0.1690% |
| 1926 | #92 | 2,033 | 0.1831% |
| 1925 | #91 | 2,092 | 0.1875% |
| 1924 | #91 | 2,123 | 0.1874% |
| 1923 | #89 | 2,204 | 0.2011% |
| 1922 | #84 | 2,349 | 0.2159% |
| 1921 | #85 | 2,367 | 0.2149% |
| 1920 | #84 | 2,283 | 0.2145% |
| 1919 | #75 | 2,384 | 0.2432% |
| 1918 | #75 | 2,505 | 0.2472% |
| 1917 | #72 | 2,455 | 0.2653% |
| 1916 | #74 | 2,313 | 0.2599% |
| 1915 | #68 | 2,339 | 0.2756% |
| 1914 | #67 | 1,880 | 0.2871% |
| 1913 | #65 | 1,527 | 0.2979% |
| 1912 | #63 | 1,325 | 0.3082% |
| 1911 | #47 | 928 | 0.4107% |
| 1910 | #40 | 888 | 0.4572% |
| 1909 | #44 | 700 | 0.4268% |
| 1908 | #46 | 644 | 0.4173% |
| 1907 | #43 | 631 | 0.4298% |
| 1906 | #43 | 552 | 0.4146% |
| 1905 | #39 | 620 | 0.4686% |
| 1904 | #40 | 603 | 0.4706% |
| 1903 | #41 | 552 | 0.4630% |
| 1902 | #41 | 559 | 0.4557% |
| 1901 | #41 | 479 | 0.4499% |
| 1900 | #34 | 821 | 0.5456% |
| 1899 | #44 | 469 | 0.4416% |
| 1898 | #42 | 543 | 0.4426% |
| 1897 | #45 | 478 | 0.4239% |
| 1896 | #43 | 518 | 0.4332% |
| 1895 | #43 | 487 | 0.4148% |
| 1894 | #43 | 507 | 0.4379% |
| 1893 | #43 | 481 | 0.4282% |
| 1892 | #38 | 551 | 0.4515% |
| 1891 | #43 | 418 | 0.4131% |
| 1890 | #41 | 489 | 0.4404% |
| 1889 | #40 | 486 | 0.4395% |
| 1888 | #34 | 607 | 0.5023% |
| 1887 | #39 | 463 | 0.4566% |
| 1886 | #34 | 519 | 0.4685% |
| 1885 | #35 | 492 | 0.4564% |
| 1884 | #33 | 533 | 0.4657% |
| 1883 | #33 | 476 | 0.4550% |
| 1882 | #30 | 555 | 0.4882% |
| 1881 | #32 | 481 | 0.4775% |
| 1880 | #36 | 457 | 0.4136% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.