Fun Facts About the Name Owen
- A newer favorite: Owen first entered the U.S. top 100 in 2002 and stayed there through 2025 - a run of 24 consecutive years.
- More than 246 thousand babies named Owen: U.S. records list 246,277 babies given the name Owen from 1880 through 2025. Even 676 girls received the name Owen - about 1 girl for every 363 boys.
What Does the Name Owen Mean?
Owen is the English spelling of the Welsh name Owain. Its original meaning is uncertain. The explanation cited most often is that Owain comes from Latin Eugenius, itself from Greek Eugenios, meaning "well-born" or "noble." Some scholars accept this derivation; others treat Owain as an old Brittonic name with no clear Latin source and regard the resemblance to Eugenius as coincidence. No derivation has been proved, so the name's etymology remains open.
Separately, Owen has also been used as an English form of the Gaelic name Eoghan, which means "born of the yew" (from Old Irish eó, "yew"). That name shares Owen's spelling but not its origin.
Owen Name History & Origins
Owain is one of the oldest names recorded in Welsh. Its best-known early bearer was Owain ab Urien, a king of the northern British kingdom of Rheged in the late sixth century, who is remembered in medieval Welsh poetry and later became the hero of the tale Owain, or the Lady of the Fountain, the Welsh counterpart of Chrétien de Troyes's Old French romance Yvain.
The name was borne by later Welsh rulers as well. Owain Gwynedd was king of Gwynedd in the twelfth century, and Owain Glyndŵr claimed the title prince of Wales and led a revolt against English rule in the early fifteenth century. Owain ap Maredudd ap Tudur, known in English as Owen Tudor, married Catherine of Valois and became the grandfather of Henry VII; his career shows the name passing from Welsh into English use in the fifteenth century.
Because Welsh families traditionally formed surnames from the father's given name, Owen also became a Welsh surname, and from the surname it entered wider English use as a first name.
In Ireland and the Scottish Highlands, Owen (or Ewen) has also served as an English form of the unrelated Gaelic name Eoghan / Eòghan.
How Popular is the Name Owen?
Owen recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 2016. Owen entered the top 100 U.S. boy names in 2002.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #4,329 | 33 | 0.0021% |
| 2024 | #5,902 | 21 | 0.0013% |
| 2023 | #4,629 | 30 | 0.0019% |
| 2022 | #5,131 | 26 | 0.0016% |
| 2021 | #3,860 | 39 | 0.0024% |
| 2020 | #5,132 | 25 | 0.0015% |
| 2019 | #5,005 | 27 | 0.0016% |
| 2018 | #5,288 | 25 | 0.0015% |
| 2017 | #4,665 | 30 | 0.0017% |
| 2016 | #5,244 | 26 | 0.0015% |
| 2015 | #6,916 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 2014 | #5,750 | 23 | 0.0013% |
| 2013 | #8,060 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 2012 | #6,518 | 20 | 0.0011% |
| 2011 | #7,046 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 2010 | #11,050 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2009 | #8,773 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2008 | #5,709 | 25 | 0.0013% |
| 2007 | #9,411 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 2006 | #10,435 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2005 | #5,951 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 2004 | #4,787 | 28 | 0.0015% |
| 2003 | #7,892 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 2002 | #9,327 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2000 | #12,797 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1999 | #13,971 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1998 | #10,872 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1997 | #13,290 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1995 | #12,920 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1991 | #12,644 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1985 | #10,263 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1983 | #9,861 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1982 | #10,095 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1978 | #10,934 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1973 | #8,118 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1970 | #7,717 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1968 | #6,787 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1957 | #6,785 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1950 | #5,139 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1938 | #4,226 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1931 | #4,828 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| 1930 | #3,589 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1929 | #3,333 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1926 | #5,451 | 5 | 0.0004% |
| 1923 | #5,528 | 5 | 0.0004% |
| 1918 | #3,783 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1917 | #4,471 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| 1916 | #4,984 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| 1915 | #4,802 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #31 | 7,190 | 0.4209% |
| 2024 | #26 | 7,574 | 0.4416% |
| 2023 | #20 | 8,011 | 0.4689% |
| 2022 | #18 | 8,584 | 0.4921% |
| 2021 | #22 | 8,768 | 0.5015% |
| 2020 | #22 | 8,667 | 0.5024% |
| 2019 | #21 | 9,346 | 0.5211% |
| 2018 | #25 | 9,335 | 0.5142% |
| 2017 | #28 | 9,363 | 0.5060% |
| 2016 | #24 | 10,302 | 0.5430% |
| 2015 | #36 | 9,607 | 0.5013% |
| 2014 | #36 | 9,158 | 0.4769% |
| 2013 | #38 | 8,766 | 0.4635% |
| 2012 | #38 | 8,695 | 0.4584% |
| 2011 | #44 | 8,341 | 0.4392% |
| 2010 | #47 | 8,177 | 0.4262% |
| 2009 | #51 | 8,142 | 0.4105% |
| 2008 | #58 | 7,800 | 0.3824% |
| 2007 | #56 | 8,247 | 0.3974% |
| 2006 | #58 | 8,172 | 0.3976% |
| 2005 | #60 | 7,169 | 0.3590% |
| 2004 | #67 | 6,707 | 0.3379% |
| 2003 | #72 | 5,701 | 0.2886% |
| 2002 | #94 | 4,190 | 0.2158% |
| 2001 | #130 | 3,032 | 0.1561% |
| 2000 | #145 | 2,715 | 0.1382% |
| 1999 | #153 | 2,377 | 0.1238% |
| 1998 | #179 | 1,872 | 0.0979% |
| 1997 | #224 | 1,368 | 0.0726% |
| 1996 | #277 | 1,005 | 0.0531% |
| 1995 | #350 | 701 | 0.0368% |
| 1994 | #453 | 490 | 0.0254% |
| 1993 | #460 | 458 | 0.0234% |
| 1992 | #473 | 453 | 0.0227% |
| 1991 | #462 | 455 | 0.0225% |
| 1990 | #453 | 480 | 0.0234% |
| 1989 | #448 | 439 | 0.0219% |
| 1988 | #417 | 467 | 0.0244% |
| 1987 | #404 | 462 | 0.0247% |
| 1986 | #428 | 408 | 0.0222% |
| 1985 | #422 | 412 | 0.0223% |
| 1984 | #414 | 399 | 0.0221% |
| 1983 | #438 | 357 | 0.0199% |
| 1982 | #432 | 376 | 0.0207% |
| 1981 | #429 | 381 | 0.0213% |
| 1980 | #440 | 353 | 0.0198% |
| 1979 | #412 | 371 | 0.0215% |
| 1978 | #489 | 272 | 0.0166% |
| 1977 | #443 | 324 | 0.0197% |
| 1976 | #475 | 277 | 0.0177% |
| 1975 | #467 | 298 | 0.0191% |
| 1974 | #429 | 337 | 0.0214% |
| 1973 | #427 | 337 | 0.0216% |
| 1972 | #446 | 316 | 0.0195% |
| 1971 | #518 | 248 | 0.0140% |
| 1970 | #524 | 238 | 0.0128% |
| 1969 | #461 | 274 | 0.0153% |
| 1968 | #515 | 215 | 0.0124% |
| 1967 | #497 | 228 | 0.0131% |
| 1966 | #473 | 264 | 0.0148% |
| 1965 | #471 | 273 | 0.0147% |
| 1964 | #464 | 294 | 0.0148% |
| 1963 | #477 | 279 | 0.0137% |
| 1962 | #429 | 350 | 0.0169% |
| 1961 | #424 | 353 | 0.0166% |
| 1960 | #405 | 386 | 0.0181% |
| 1959 | #405 | 385 | 0.0180% |
| 1958 | #406 | 370 | 0.0174% |
| 1957 | #382 | 406 | 0.0188% |
| 1956 | #371 | 400 | 0.0189% |
| 1955 | #387 | 347 | 0.0168% |
| 1954 | #362 | 402 | 0.0197% |
| 1953 | #341 | 414 | 0.0210% |
| 1952 | #326 | 455 | 0.0234% |
| 1951 | #354 | 377 | 0.0200% |
| 1950 | #341 | 389 | 0.0217% |
| 1949 | #352 | 369 | 0.0208% |
| 1948 | #342 | 386 | 0.0220% |
| 1947 | #339 | 406 | 0.0222% |
| 1946 | #324 | 392 | 0.0241% |
| 1945 | #308 | 369 | 0.0274% |
| 1944 | #304 | 392 | 0.0288% |
| 1943 | #300 | 418 | 0.0293% |
| 1942 | #298 | 415 | 0.0300% |
| 1941 | #286 | 412 | 0.0335% |
| 1940 | #294 | 363 | 0.0313% |
| 1939 | #283 | 383 | 0.0346% |
| 1938 | #274 | 406 | 0.0366% |
| 1937 | #267 | 412 | 0.0386% |
| 1936 | #276 | 385 | 0.0371% |
| 1935 | #268 | 411 | 0.0395% |
| 1934 | #259 | 435 | 0.0421% |
| 1933 | #249 | 440 | 0.0444% |
| 1932 | #256 | 444 | 0.0425% |
| 1931 | #252 | 456 | 0.0439% |
| 1930 | #245 | 513 | 0.0467% |
| 1929 | #236 | 526 | 0.0489% |
| 1928 | #250 | 505 | 0.0456% |
| 1927 | #238 | 552 | 0.0490% |
| 1926 | #238 | 554 | 0.0499% |
| 1925 | #227 | 582 | 0.0522% |
| 1924 | #213 | 634 | 0.0560% |
| 1923 | #224 | 587 | 0.0536% |
| 1922 | #205 | 632 | 0.0581% |
| 1921 | #195 | 703 | 0.0638% |
| 1920 | #217 | 598 | 0.0562% |
| 1919 | #221 | 556 | 0.0567% |
| 1918 | #212 | 591 | 0.0583% |
| 1917 | #224 | 489 | 0.0528% |
| 1916 | #219 | 488 | 0.0548% |
| 1915 | #216 | 479 | 0.0564% |
| 1914 | #225 | 356 | 0.0544% |
| 1913 | #216 | 293 | 0.0572% |
| 1912 | #209 | 265 | 0.0616% |
| 1911 | #196 | 156 | 0.0690% |
| 1910 | #214 | 118 | 0.0608% |
| 1909 | #233 | 90 | 0.0549% |
| 1908 | #197 | 105 | 0.0680% |
| 1907 | #195 | 104 | 0.0708% |
| 1906 | #217 | 82 | 0.0616% |
| 1905 | #196 | 89 | 0.0673% |
| 1904 | #220 | 71 | 0.0554% |
| 1903 | #192 | 83 | 0.0696% |
| 1902 | #227 | 63 | 0.0514% |
| 1901 | #182 | 80 | 0.0751% |
| 1900 | #203 | 93 | 0.0618% |
| 1899 | #201 | 66 | 0.0621% |
| 1898 | #221 | 64 | 0.0522% |
| 1897 | #203 | 70 | 0.0621% |
| 1896 | #197 | 83 | 0.0694% |
| 1895 | #195 | 75 | 0.0639% |
| 1894 | #186 | 80 | 0.0691% |
| 1893 | #184 | 80 | 0.0712% |
| 1892 | #158 | 102 | 0.0836% |
| 1891 | #180 | 73 | 0.0721% |
| 1890 | #197 | 68 | 0.0612% |
| 1889 | #181 | 75 | 0.0678% |
| 1888 | #156 | 98 | 0.0811% |
| 1887 | #184 | 68 | 0.0671% |
| 1886 | #170 | 83 | 0.0749% |
| 1885 | #188 | 70 | 0.0649% |
| 1884 | #151 | 91 | 0.0795% |
| 1883 | #189 | 63 | 0.0602% |
| 1882 | #199 | 65 | 0.0572% |
| 1881 | #174 | 67 | 0.0665% |
| 1880 | #169 | 78 | 0.0706% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.