Fun Facts About the Name Ray
- Decades of popularity: Ray stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 69 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1948.
- More than 210 thousand babies named Ray: U.S. records list 210,308 babies given the name Ray from 1880 through 2025. Even 5,605 girls received the name Ray - about 1 girl for every 37 boys.
What Does the Name Ray Mean?
Ray is an English given name whose main established meaning is 'counsel protector,' from the Germanic Raginmund. That name is made of ragin 'counsel, advice' and mund 'protector, protection,' and it reached English through Old French Raimund and Raymond. Ray is therefore chiefly a short form of Raymond. The first element also appears in names like Rainer and Reginald; the second appears in Edmund. Used on its own, Ray is often associated with the English noun ray, 'a beam of light,' which comes from Latin radius by way of Old French rai. That is a later word association rather than the origin of the given name. The surname Ray is a separate matter: it has several origins, including an Old French nickname from roi 'king' and a Middle English word for a roe deer.
Ray Name History & Origins
The full name behind Ray is Raymond. Germanic Raginmund became Raimund and Raymond in medieval France, and Norman settlers brought it to England after 1066. English records show forms such as Reimund and Raymund, with Ray used as a familiar shortening. The name gained religious standing through saints including Raymond of Penyafort (c. 1175 - 1275), a Dominican canon lawyer, and Raymond Nonnatus (1204 - 1240). Because it was short and plain, Ray also came to be written as a given name in its own right. It has been used for both men and women, with Rae a common feminine spelling. A surname Ray developed alongside the given name from different sources, and the English noun ray later gave the name a popular 'beam of light' reading that is separate from its Raymond history.
How Popular is the Name Ray?
Ray remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1948. Its highest annual birth count was in 1926, and people born that year turn 100 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #6,274 | 19 | 0.0012% |
| 2024 | #4,978 | 27 | 0.0017% |
| 2023 | #5,093 | 26 | 0.0016% |
| 2022 | #4,763 | 29 | 0.0018% |
| 2021 | #4,926 | 27 | 0.0016% |
| 2020 | #5,614 | 22 | 0.0014% |
| 2019 | #6,949 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 2018 | #5,963 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 2017 | #5,995 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 2016 | #6,146 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 2015 | #10,704 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2014 | #11,730 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2013 | #10,100 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 2012 | #18,944 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2009 | #19,555 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2008 | #17,014 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2005 | #12,752 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2002 | #10,889 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2001 | #14,907 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2000 | #14,597 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1999 | #8,106 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1997 | #10,563 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1994 | #8,628 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1993 | #10,324 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1992 | #7,402 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1991 | #14,823 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1990 | #9,038 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1989 | #7,889 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1988 | #5,529 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 1987 | #5,254 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 1986 | #10,527 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1985 | #6,816 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1984 | #8,886 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1983 | #5,375 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1982 | #4,674 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1981 | #6,683 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1980 | #6,640 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1979 | #4,176 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1978 | #3,256 | 24 | 0.0016% |
| 1977 | #4,022 | 18 | 0.0012% |
| 1976 | #4,293 | 15 | 0.0010% |
| 1975 | #3,373 | 21 | 0.0014% |
| 1974 | #4,651 | 13 | 0.0009% |
| 1973 | #3,208 | 21 | 0.0014% |
| 1972 | #3,673 | 17 | 0.0011% |
| 1971 | #2,710 | 27 | 0.0016% |
| 1970 | #2,754 | 26 | 0.0015% |
| 1969 | #2,752 | 24 | 0.0014% |
| 1968 | #2,608 | 24 | 0.0015% |
| 1967 | #3,043 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1966 | #2,293 | 28 | 0.0017% |
| 1965 | #2,522 | 24 | 0.0014% |
| 1964 | #2,648 | 23 | 0.0012% |
| 1963 | #1,747 | 44 | 0.0023% |
| 1962 | #2,064 | 33 | 0.0017% |
| 1961 | #2,104 | 32 | 0.0016% |
| 1960 | #2,049 | 32 | 0.0016% |
| 1959 | #1,610 | 46 | 0.0023% |
| 1958 | #1,522 | 50 | 0.0025% |
| 1957 | #1,675 | 42 | 0.0021% |
| 1956 | #1,465 | 53 | 0.0026% |
| 1955 | #1,724 | 37 | 0.0019% |
| 1954 | #1,555 | 43 | 0.0022% |
| 1953 | #1,403 | 49 | 0.0026% |
| 1952 | #1,549 | 39 | 0.0021% |
| 1951 | #1,460 | 42 | 0.0023% |
| 1950 | #1,671 | 32 | 0.0019% |
| 1949 | #1,465 | 40 | 0.0023% |
| 1948 | #1,343 | 48 | 0.0028% |
| 1947 | #1,571 | 37 | 0.0021% |
| 1946 | #1,254 | 48 | 0.0031% |
| 1945 | #1,276 | 40 | 0.0031% |
| 1944 | #1,171 | 46 | 0.0035% |
| 1943 | #1,247 | 43 | 0.0031% |
| 1942 | #1,151 | 48 | 0.0036% |
| 1941 | #1,330 | 34 | 0.0028% |
| 1940 | #1,060 | 47 | 0.0041% |
| 1939 | #1,073 | 45 | 0.0041% |
| 1938 | #1,085 | 44 | 0.0040% |
| 1937 | #1,013 | 49 | 0.0046% |
| 1936 | #851 | 64 | 0.0062% |
| 1935 | #791 | 74 | 0.0071% |
| 1934 | #827 | 68 | 0.0065% |
| 1933 | #812 | 68 | 0.0067% |
| 1932 | #806 | 72 | 0.0067% |
| 1931 | #742 | 83 | 0.0078% |
| 1930 | #682 | 102 | 0.0091% |
| 1929 | #649 | 116 | 0.0104% |
| 1928 | #730 | 95 | 0.0082% |
| 1927 | #703 | 108 | 0.0091% |
| 1926 | #661 | 120 | 0.0101% |
| 1925 | #751 | 97 | 0.0080% |
| 1924 | #673 | 122 | 0.0098% |
| 1923 | #681 | 120 | 0.0099% |
| 1922 | #748 | 96 | 0.0080% |
| 1921 | #644 | 133 | 0.0108% |
| 1920 | #606 | 138 | 0.0115% |
| 1919 | #624 | 126 | 0.0111% |
| 1918 | #558 | 162 | 0.0140% |
| 1917 | #594 | 133 | 0.0123% |
| 1916 | #585 | 132 | 0.0126% |
| 1915 | #581 | 126 | 0.0128% |
| 1914 | #538 | 108 | 0.0142% |
| 1913 | #633 | 67 | 0.0107% |
| 1912 | #646 | 60 | 0.0108% |
| 1911 | #527 | 63 | 0.0151% |
| 1910 | #547 | 56 | 0.0141% |
| 1909 | #540 | 50 | 0.0144% |
| 1908 | #573 | 43 | 0.0129% |
| 1907 | #612 | 38 | 0.0119% |
| 1906 | #525 | 44 | 0.0149% |
| 1905 | #527 | 43 | 0.0147% |
| 1904 | #639 | 30 | 0.0109% |
| 1903 | #563 | 34 | 0.0130% |
| 1902 | #508 | 40 | 0.0151% |
| 1901 | #820 | 17 | 0.0071% |
| 1900 | #601 | 35 | 0.0117% |
| 1899 | #523 | 33 | 0.0142% |
| 1898 | #585 | 31 | 0.0120% |
| 1897 | #446 | 44 | 0.0188% |
| 1896 | #503 | 35 | 0.0147% |
| 1895 | #573 | 28 | 0.0120% |
| 1894 | #444 | 40 | 0.0179% |
| 1893 | #453 | 35 | 0.0164% |
| 1892 | #439 | 38 | 0.0179% |
| 1891 | #421 | 36 | 0.0194% |
| 1890 | #381 | 44 | 0.0231% |
| 1889 | #451 | 30 | 0.0168% |
| 1888 | #467 | 29 | 0.0162% |
| 1887 | #487 | 22 | 0.0151% |
| 1886 | #490 | 21 | 0.0145% |
| 1885 | #425 | 25 | 0.0188% |
| 1884 | #437 | 22 | 0.0171% |
| 1883 | #644 | 10 | 0.0089% |
| 1882 | #488 | 15 | 0.0139% |
| 1881 | #533 | 11 | 0.0120% |
| 1880 | #668 | 8 | 0.0088% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #792 | 319 | 0.0187% |
| 2024 | #779 | 322 | 0.0188% |
| 2023 | #765 | 336 | 0.0197% |
| 2022 | #762 | 332 | 0.0190% |
| 2021 | #843 | 282 | 0.0161% |
| 2020 | #725 | 343 | 0.0199% |
| 2019 | #736 | 328 | 0.0183% |
| 2018 | #728 | 330 | 0.0182% |
| 2017 | #769 | 306 | 0.0165% |
| 2016 | #753 | 324 | 0.0171% |
| 2015 | #713 | 348 | 0.0182% |
| 2014 | #728 | 329 | 0.0171% |
| 2013 | #666 | 363 | 0.0192% |
| 2012 | #719 | 327 | 0.0172% |
| 2011 | #682 | 346 | 0.0182% |
| 2010 | #660 | 364 | 0.0190% |
| 2009 | #670 | 366 | 0.0185% |
| 2008 | #653 | 374 | 0.0183% |
| 2007 | #633 | 384 | 0.0185% |
| 2006 | #557 | 451 | 0.0219% |
| 2005 | #563 | 420 | 0.0210% |
| 2004 | #578 | 391 | 0.0197% |
| 2003 | #618 | 336 | 0.0170% |
| 2002 | #580 | 377 | 0.0194% |
| 2001 | #573 | 360 | 0.0185% |
| 2000 | #516 | 435 | 0.0221% |
| 1999 | #513 | 414 | 0.0216% |
| 1998 | #489 | 446 | 0.0233% |
| 1997 | #483 | 443 | 0.0235% |
| 1996 | #484 | 445 | 0.0235% |
| 1995 | #456 | 495 | 0.0260% |
| 1994 | #405 | 564 | 0.0292% |
| 1993 | #413 | 562 | 0.0287% |
| 1992 | #395 | 582 | 0.0291% |
| 1991 | #349 | 695 | 0.0344% |
| 1990 | #329 | 755 | 0.0368% |
| 1989 | #326 | 722 | 0.0361% |
| 1988 | #305 | 744 | 0.0389% |
| 1987 | #283 | 770 | 0.0412% |
| 1986 | #285 | 738 | 0.0401% |
| 1985 | #271 | 768 | 0.0416% |
| 1984 | #272 | 766 | 0.0424% |
| 1983 | #272 | 764 | 0.0426% |
| 1982 | #254 | 867 | 0.0478% |
| 1981 | #256 | 855 | 0.0477% |
| 1980 | #261 | 844 | 0.0473% |
| 1979 | #258 | 824 | 0.0479% |
| 1978 | #257 | 793 | 0.0483% |
| 1977 | #251 | 807 | 0.0491% |
| 1976 | #238 | 850 | 0.0542% |
| 1975 | #228 | 897 | 0.0574% |
| 1974 | #220 | 955 | 0.0607% |
| 1973 | #207 | 1,046 | 0.0671% |
| 1972 | #197 | 1,178 | 0.0726% |
| 1971 | #196 | 1,267 | 0.0716% |
| 1970 | #186 | 1,462 | 0.0787% |
| 1969 | #182 | 1,522 | 0.0851% |
| 1968 | #170 | 1,593 | 0.0917% |
| 1967 | #165 | 1,616 | 0.0927% |
| 1966 | #155 | 1,826 | 0.1024% |
| 1965 | #147 | 2,092 | 0.1125% |
| 1964 | #143 | 2,277 | 0.1143% |
| 1963 | #131 | 2,584 | 0.1272% |
| 1962 | #132 | 2,675 | 0.1293% |
| 1961 | #126 | 2,920 | 0.1375% |
| 1960 | #121 | 3,080 | 0.1445% |
| 1959 | #121 | 3,221 | 0.1509% |
| 1958 | #121 | 3,189 | 0.1503% |
| 1957 | #111 | 3,409 | 0.1580% |
| 1956 | #113 | 3,230 | 0.1527% |
| 1955 | #113 | 3,069 | 0.1490% |
| 1954 | #118 | 2,977 | 0.1460% |
| 1953 | #115 | 2,815 | 0.1427% |
| 1952 | #113 | 2,690 | 0.1384% |
| 1951 | #114 | 2,678 | 0.1422% |
| 1950 | #111 | 2,636 | 0.1472% |
| 1949 | #109 | 2,710 | 0.1528% |
| 1948 | #100 | 3,134 | 0.1786% |
| 1947 | #97 | 3,378 | 0.1846% |
| 1946 | #95 | 3,170 | 0.1952% |
| 1945 | #92 | 2,740 | 0.2036% |
| 1944 | #86 | 2,904 | 0.2131% |
| 1943 | #84 | 3,063 | 0.2146% |
| 1942 | #84 | 3,066 | 0.2220% |
| 1941 | #83 | 2,695 | 0.2194% |
| 1940 | #77 | 2,795 | 0.2411% |
| 1939 | #74 | 2,709 | 0.2448% |
| 1938 | #72 | 2,881 | 0.2598% |
| 1937 | #71 | 2,725 | 0.2555% |
| 1936 | #65 | 2,939 | 0.2834% |
| 1935 | #64 | 3,070 | 0.2948% |
| 1934 | #63 | 3,176 | 0.3076% |
| 1933 | #62 | 3,033 | 0.3059% |
| 1932 | #59 | 3,264 | 0.3126% |
| 1931 | #60 | 3,161 | 0.3040% |
| 1930 | #57 | 3,253 | 0.2964% |
| 1929 | #57 | 3,174 | 0.2951% |
| 1928 | #57 | 3,248 | 0.2932% |
| 1927 | #60 | 3,253 | 0.2887% |
| 1926 | #57 | 3,409 | 0.3070% |
| 1925 | #64 | 3,219 | 0.2885% |
| 1924 | #60 | 3,369 | 0.2974% |
| 1923 | #61 | 3,161 | 0.2884% |
| 1922 | #65 | 3,051 | 0.2804% |
| 1921 | #67 | 3,075 | 0.2792% |
| 1920 | #67 | 3,086 | 0.2899% |
| 1919 | #69 | 2,722 | 0.2777% |
| 1918 | #69 | 2,763 | 0.2726% |
| 1917 | #74 | 2,426 | 0.2621% |
| 1916 | #73 | 2,334 | 0.2622% |
| 1915 | #67 | 2,365 | 0.2787% |
| 1914 | #74 | 1,657 | 0.2531% |
| 1913 | #73 | 1,328 | 0.2591% |
| 1912 | #77 | 1,050 | 0.2442% |
| 1911 | #71 | 602 | 0.2664% |
| 1910 | #68 | 545 | 0.2806% |
| 1909 | #67 | 475 | 0.2896% |
| 1908 | #67 | 446 | 0.2890% |
| 1907 | #60 | 475 | 0.3235% |
| 1906 | #60 | 421 | 0.3162% |
| 1905 | #60 | 424 | 0.3205% |
| 1904 | #55 | 432 | 0.3372% |
| 1903 | #55 | 397 | 0.3330% |
| 1902 | #57 | 391 | 0.3188% |
| 1901 | #59 | 338 | 0.3175% |
| 1900 | #55 | 457 | 0.3037% |
| 1899 | #61 | 315 | 0.2966% |
| 1898 | #56 | 394 | 0.3211% |
| 1897 | #52 | 397 | 0.3521% |
| 1896 | #50 | 426 | 0.3563% |
| 1895 | #56 | 380 | 0.3237% |
| 1894 | #57 | 379 | 0.3274% |
| 1893 | #56 | 378 | 0.3365% |
| 1892 | #57 | 385 | 0.3155% |
| 1891 | #49 | 360 | 0.3558% |
| 1890 | #56 | 349 | 0.3143% |
| 1889 | #54 | 355 | 0.3210% |
| 1888 | #63 | 331 | 0.2739% |
| 1887 | #66 | 258 | 0.2544% |
| 1886 | #67 | 271 | 0.2446% |
| 1885 | #74 | 237 | 0.2199% |
| 1884 | #77 | 232 | 0.2027% |
| 1883 | #78 | 202 | 0.1931% |
| 1882 | #83 | 195 | 0.1715% |
| 1881 | #87 | 148 | 0.1469% |
| 1880 | #95 | 142 | 0.1285% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.