Fun Facts About the Name Lewis
- Decades of popularity: Lewis stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 57 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1936.
- More than 156 thousand babies named Lewis: U.S. records list 156,625 babies given the name Lewis from 1880 through 2025. Even 870 girls received the name Lewis - about 1 girl for every 179 boys.
What Does the Name Lewis Mean?
Lewis is the English form of the French name Louis, which comes from the Frankish name recorded in Latin as Chlodovicus and Hludovicus, and in Frankish as Hludwig. It is built from two Germanic elements: *hlūdaz, meaning "fame" or "renowned" (the same root behind Old English hlūd, "loud"), and *wīgą, meaning "battle" or "war." Taken element by element, the name means roughly "famous in battle." The usual English gloss, "famous warrior," is a customary rendering rather than a literal one, since the second element denotes battle or war, not a warrior.
The given name Lewis is not related to the Scottish surname Lewis, which is often an anglicization of the Gaelic Mac Leòid, nor is it connected to the Isle of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides, whose name has a Norse origin. Those are separate names that happen to share the same spelling.
Lewis Name History & Origins
The Frankish original is best known through the Merovingian king Clovis I (ruled 481 - 511), whose name appears in Latin sources as Chlodovicus. In the Frankish territories the name took the form Hludwig, which developed into Old French Looïs and later Louis. When the Normans brought the name to England after 1066, English scribes wrote it as Lewis, Lowis, and Loys. English speakers settled on Lewis while the French royal house kept Louis, so the two forms are branches of one Frankish name rather than independent creations.
Lewis was in use as a given name in England during the Middle Ages, partly through the influence of the French-speaking nobility and later through the example of French kings named Louis. It became notably common in Wales, where it was used alongside Welsh names and where the surname Lewis, derived from the given name, is widespread. In Scotland, Lewis also appears as a given name, sometimes as an anglicized form of the Gaelic personal name Leòd, which is a different root from the Frankish one.
Related forms in other European languages include German Ludwig, Spanish Luis, Italian Luigi, and Dutch Lodewijk, all of which descend from the same Frankish compound.
How Popular is the Name Lewis?
Lewis remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1936. Its highest annual birth count was in 1921, and people born that year turn 105 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | #15,262 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1988 | #12,976 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1987 | #9,360 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1986 | #7,460 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1984 | #6,563 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1983 | #7,711 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1982 | #8,769 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1981 | #5,445 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1979 | #6,471 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1978 | #6,688 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 1977 | #9,115 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1976 | #5,420 | 11 | 0.0008% |
| 1975 | #5,784 | 10 | 0.0007% |
| 1974 | #6,023 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 1973 | #7,085 | 7 | 0.0005% |
| 1971 | #5,797 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1970 | #4,641 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1969 | #3,706 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 1968 | #4,648 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1967 | #7,363 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1966 | #4,348 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1964 | #3,803 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1963 | #6,260 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1962 | #6,247 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1961 | #4,402 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1960 | #4,325 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1959 | #3,355 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1958 | #5,802 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1956 | #3,125 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1955 | #3,684 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1954 | #4,482 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1953 | #5,397 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1952 | #3,476 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1951 | #3,619 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1949 | #3,514 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1948 | #4,067 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1947 | #2,840 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1946 | #4,736 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1945 | #2,681 | 12 | 0.0009% |
| 1944 | #2,159 | 17 | 0.0013% |
| 1943 | #2,639 | 13 | 0.0009% |
| 1942 | #3,108 | 10 | 0.0007% |
| 1941 | #2,766 | 11 | 0.0009% |
| 1940 | #3,380 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1939 | #2,833 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1938 | #2,671 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1937 | #2,514 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1936 | #3,571 | 7 | 0.0007% |
| 1935 | #2,505 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1934 | #2,244 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1933 | #2,618 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1932 | #2,001 | 17 | 0.0016% |
| 1931 | #2,260 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1930 | #1,989 | 18 | 0.0016% |
| 1929 | #2,663 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1928 | #1,813 | 22 | 0.0019% |
| 1927 | #1,984 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1926 | #1,962 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1925 | #2,446 | 15 | 0.0012% |
| 1924 | #2,608 | 14 | 0.0011% |
| 1923 | #3,033 | 11 | 0.0009% |
| 1922 | #1,993 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1921 | #2,084 | 19 | 0.0015% |
| 1920 | #3,236 | 10 | 0.0008% |
| 1919 | #1,826 | 21 | 0.0019% |
| 1918 | #2,157 | 17 | 0.0015% |
| 1917 | #1,624 | 23 | 0.0021% |
| 1916 | #3,156 | 9 | 0.0009% |
| 1915 | #3,630 | 7 | 0.0007% |
| 1914 | #1,964 | 13 | 0.0017% |
| 1913 | #2,246 | 9 | 0.0014% |
| 1912 | #2,260 | 8 | 0.0014% |
| 1911 | #1,605 | 10 | 0.0024% |
| 1910 | #2,034 | 7 | 0.0018% |
| 1909 | #1,879 | 7 | 0.0020% |
| 1905 | #1,820 | 6 | 0.0021% |
| 1903 | #1,945 | 5 | 0.0019% |
| 1897 | #1,679 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1895 | #1,725 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1892 | #1,369 | 6 | 0.0028% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #433 | 736 | 0.0431% |
| 2024 | #433 | 728 | 0.0424% |
| 2023 | #470 | 648 | 0.0379% |
| 2022 | #489 | 622 | 0.0357% |
| 2021 | #487 | 607 | 0.0347% |
| 2020 | #497 | 588 | 0.0341% |
| 2019 | #556 | 507 | 0.0283% |
| 2018 | #548 | 510 | 0.0281% |
| 2017 | #542 | 521 | 0.0282% |
| 2016 | #506 | 592 | 0.0312% |
| 2015 | #568 | 495 | 0.0258% |
| 2014 | #594 | 463 | 0.0241% |
| 2013 | #635 | 389 | 0.0206% |
| 2012 | #636 | 378 | 0.0199% |
| 2011 | #630 | 371 | 0.0195% |
| 2010 | #715 | 326 | 0.0170% |
| 2009 | #725 | 326 | 0.0164% |
| 2008 | #637 | 386 | 0.0189% |
| 2007 | #695 | 339 | 0.0163% |
| 2006 | #679 | 333 | 0.0162% |
| 2005 | #657 | 328 | 0.0164% |
| 2004 | #627 | 337 | 0.0170% |
| 2003 | #633 | 324 | 0.0164% |
| 2002 | #592 | 353 | 0.0182% |
| 2001 | #590 | 339 | 0.0174% |
| 2000 | #573 | 356 | 0.0181% |
| 1999 | #516 | 412 | 0.0215% |
| 1998 | #558 | 354 | 0.0185% |
| 1997 | #536 | 372 | 0.0197% |
| 1996 | #494 | 428 | 0.0226% |
| 1995 | #521 | 378 | 0.0199% |
| 1994 | #487 | 432 | 0.0224% |
| 1993 | #458 | 460 | 0.0235% |
| 1992 | #413 | 544 | 0.0272% |
| 1991 | #396 | 574 | 0.0284% |
| 1990 | #398 | 579 | 0.0282% |
| 1989 | #391 | 560 | 0.0280% |
| 1988 | #358 | 571 | 0.0298% |
| 1987 | #346 | 573 | 0.0307% |
| 1986 | #335 | 581 | 0.0315% |
| 1985 | #341 | 559 | 0.0302% |
| 1984 | #334 | 556 | 0.0308% |
| 1983 | #322 | 594 | 0.0331% |
| 1982 | #322 | 594 | 0.0327% |
| 1981 | #313 | 608 | 0.0339% |
| 1980 | #306 | 645 | 0.0362% |
| 1979 | #287 | 701 | 0.0407% |
| 1978 | #299 | 625 | 0.0381% |
| 1977 | #294 | 665 | 0.0405% |
| 1976 | #281 | 679 | 0.0433% |
| 1975 | #290 | 660 | 0.0423% |
| 1974 | #270 | 707 | 0.0450% |
| 1973 | #261 | 748 | 0.0480% |
| 1972 | #253 | 800 | 0.0493% |
| 1971 | #246 | 934 | 0.0528% |
| 1970 | #236 | 999 | 0.0538% |
| 1969 | #240 | 942 | 0.0527% |
| 1968 | #230 | 962 | 0.0553% |
| 1967 | #213 | 1,061 | 0.0608% |
| 1966 | #214 | 1,056 | 0.0592% |
| 1965 | #216 | 1,117 | 0.0600% |
| 1964 | #217 | 1,248 | 0.0626% |
| 1963 | #217 | 1,284 | 0.0632% |
| 1962 | #216 | 1,276 | 0.0617% |
| 1961 | #212 | 1,338 | 0.0630% |
| 1960 | #204 | 1,398 | 0.0656% |
| 1959 | #192 | 1,534 | 0.0719% |
| 1958 | #177 | 1,669 | 0.0786% |
| 1957 | #182 | 1,672 | 0.0775% |
| 1956 | #168 | 1,767 | 0.0835% |
| 1955 | #160 | 1,782 | 0.0865% |
| 1954 | #156 | 1,838 | 0.0902% |
| 1953 | #155 | 1,852 | 0.0939% |
| 1952 | #145 | 1,995 | 0.1026% |
| 1951 | #135 | 1,997 | 0.1061% |
| 1950 | #132 | 2,028 | 0.1133% |
| 1949 | #132 | 2,081 | 0.1173% |
| 1948 | #130 | 2,143 | 0.1221% |
| 1947 | #118 | 2,439 | 0.1333% |
| 1946 | #118 | 2,154 | 0.1326% |
| 1945 | #123 | 1,836 | 0.1364% |
| 1944 | #112 | 2,044 | 0.1500% |
| 1943 | #115 | 2,181 | 0.1528% |
| 1942 | #112 | 2,180 | 0.1578% |
| 1941 | #109 | 1,973 | 0.1606% |
| 1940 | #107 | 1,900 | 0.1639% |
| 1939 | #107 | 1,856 | 0.1677% |
| 1938 | #109 | 1,882 | 0.1697% |
| 1937 | #104 | 1,836 | 0.1721% |
| 1936 | #100 | 1,855 | 0.1788% |
| 1935 | #98 | 1,974 | 0.1896% |
| 1934 | #94 | 2,062 | 0.1997% |
| 1933 | #92 | 2,037 | 0.2054% |
| 1932 | #92 | 2,112 | 0.2023% |
| 1931 | #87 | 2,160 | 0.2078% |
| 1930 | #87 | 2,243 | 0.2044% |
| 1929 | #84 | 2,228 | 0.2071% |
| 1928 | #86 | 2,339 | 0.2112% |
| 1927 | #82 | 2,497 | 0.2216% |
| 1926 | #82 | 2,444 | 0.2201% |
| 1925 | #79 | 2,577 | 0.2309% |
| 1924 | #77 | 2,670 | 0.2357% |
| 1923 | #74 | 2,618 | 0.2388% |
| 1922 | #75 | 2,555 | 0.2348% |
| 1921 | #71 | 2,712 | 0.2462% |
| 1920 | #72 | 2,688 | 0.2525% |
| 1919 | #74 | 2,429 | 0.2478% |
| 1918 | #74 | 2,593 | 0.2559% |
| 1917 | #70 | 2,477 | 0.2676% |
| 1916 | #71 | 2,374 | 0.2667% |
| 1915 | #70 | 2,307 | 0.2719% |
| 1914 | #72 | 1,767 | 0.2699% |
| 1913 | #72 | 1,384 | 0.2700% |
| 1912 | #68 | 1,247 | 0.2900% |
| 1911 | #66 | 654 | 0.2894% |
| 1910 | #65 | 555 | 0.2858% |
| 1909 | #65 | 477 | 0.2909% |
| 1908 | #61 | 489 | 0.3168% |
| 1907 | #66 | 427 | 0.2908% |
| 1906 | #69 | 365 | 0.2741% |
| 1905 | #65 | 384 | 0.2902% |
| 1904 | #59 | 402 | 0.3138% |
| 1903 | #65 | 335 | 0.2810% |
| 1902 | #59 | 385 | 0.3139% |
| 1901 | #63 | 309 | 0.2902% |
| 1900 | #52 | 469 | 0.3117% |
| 1899 | #54 | 352 | 0.3314% |
| 1898 | #62 | 352 | 0.2869% |
| 1897 | #55 | 378 | 0.3352% |
| 1896 | #56 | 386 | 0.3228% |
| 1895 | #58 | 377 | 0.3211% |
| 1894 | #59 | 359 | 0.3101% |
| 1893 | #57 | 364 | 0.3241% |
| 1892 | #55 | 399 | 0.3270% |
| 1891 | #50 | 357 | 0.3528% |
| 1890 | #51 | 375 | 0.3378% |
| 1889 | #47 | 414 | 0.3744% |
| 1888 | #50 | 412 | 0.3409% |
| 1887 | #49 | 343 | 0.3382% |
| 1886 | #43 | 431 | 0.3890% |
| 1885 | #42 | 437 | 0.4054% |
| 1884 | #39 | 476 | 0.4159% |
| 1883 | #38 | 431 | 0.4119% |
| 1882 | #39 | 441 | 0.3879% |
| 1881 | #35 | 439 | 0.4358% |
| 1880 | #30 | 517 | 0.4679% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.