Fun Facts About the Name Juliette
- More than 40 thousand babies named Juliette: U.S. records list 40,969 babies given the name Juliette from 1880 through 2025. Even 5 boys received the name Juliette - about 1 boy for every 8,193 girls.
What Does the Name Juliette Mean?
Juliette is a French feminine name, usually glossed as "youthful." It is a diminutive of Julie, the French form of Latin Iulia (Julia), which is the feminine of the Roman family name Iulius (Julius). The ultimate origin of Iulius is not fully settled. A long-standing explanation connects it with Greek ioulos, meaning "downy" or "first beard," from which came the customary sense "youthful" or "downy-haired." Another possibility is that Iulius is Etruscan or otherwise pre-Latin, so the traditional meaning is an interpretation rather than a certainty. The French suffix -ette is a diminutive ending, so the literal shape of Juliette is "little Julie" or "little Julia."
Juliette Name History & Origins
Juliette developed in French as a diminutive of Julie, formed with the feminine suffix -ette. The suffix is common in French names and often carries a diminutive or endearing force, as in Annette, Colette, and Henriette. Julie goes back to Latin Iulia, a feminine name used in ancient Rome. Through this line, Juliette is related to, but distinct from, the Italian Giulietta and the English Juliet.
The English form Juliet is familiar from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (1590s), but that is a literary use of the English form, not the source of the French name Juliette. In French, Juliette appears as a given name and is also the title of the Marquis de Sade's novel Juliette (1797); the novel is a literary appearance, not evidence of the name's invention. In modern use, Juliette is found in France and other French-speaking regions and in English-speaking countries, where it is often used alongside or as a French form of Juliet.
How Popular is the Name Juliette?
Juliette recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 2025. Its best rank was #110 in 2025.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #110 | 2,460 | 0.1531% |
| 2024 | #129 | 2,210 | 0.1370% |
| 2023 | #160 | 1,790 | 0.1117% |
| 2022 | #163 | 1,754 | 0.1070% |
| 2021 | #179 | 1,666 | 0.1016% |
| 2020 | #180 | 1,593 | 0.0986% |
| 2019 | #179 | 1,636 | 0.0975% |
| 2018 | #184 | 1,610 | 0.0947% |
| 2017 | #208 | 1,493 | 0.0865% |
| 2016 | #199 | 1,658 | 0.0936% |
| 2015 | #226 | 1,452 | 0.0814% |
| 2014 | #257 | 1,273 | 0.0713% |
| 2013 | #296 | 1,078 | 0.0614% |
| 2012 | #310 | 1,032 | 0.0586% |
| 2011 | #377 | 851 | 0.0484% |
| 2010 | #370 | 862 | 0.0485% |
| 2009 | #439 | 718 | 0.0391% |
| 2008 | #552 | 557 | 0.0295% |
| 2007 | #587 | 511 | 0.0266% |
| 2006 | #651 | 445 | 0.0234% |
| 2005 | #629 | 444 | 0.0240% |
| 2004 | #677 | 406 | 0.0221% |
| 2003 | #703 | 373 | 0.0204% |
| 2002 | #593 | 435 | 0.0242% |
| 2001 | #591 | 429 | 0.0238% |
| 2000 | #657 | 373 | 0.0205% |
| 1999 | #641 | 368 | 0.0207% |
| 1998 | #670 | 345 | 0.0195% |
| 1997 | #676 | 321 | 0.0184% |
| 1996 | #888 | 223 | 0.0127% |
| 1995 | #964 | 196 | 0.0111% |
| 1994 | #1,041 | 176 | 0.0099% |
| 1993 | #1,309 | 129 | 0.0071% |
| 1992 | #1,255 | 138 | 0.0075% |
| 1991 | #1,252 | 135 | 0.0072% |
| 1990 | #1,392 | 114 | 0.0060% |
| 1989 | #1,352 | 114 | 0.0062% |
| 1988 | #1,253 | 118 | 0.0066% |
| 1987 | #1,261 | 112 | 0.0064% |
| 1986 | #1,244 | 110 | 0.0064% |
| 1985 | #1,215 | 114 | 0.0066% |
| 1984 | #1,185 | 111 | 0.0066% |
| 1983 | #1,214 | 105 | 0.0063% |
| 1982 | #1,253 | 104 | 0.0061% |
| 1981 | #1,195 | 110 | 0.0066% |
| 1980 | #1,211 | 109 | 0.0066% |
| 1979 | #1,215 | 107 | 0.0067% |
| 1978 | #1,291 | 94 | 0.0061% |
| 1977 | #1,202 | 102 | 0.0067% |
| 1976 | #1,142 | 103 | 0.0070% |
| 1975 | #1,167 | 99 | 0.0068% |
| 1974 | #1,152 | 100 | 0.0068% |
| 1973 | #1,070 | 108 | 0.0074% |
| 1972 | #972 | 124 | 0.0082% |
| 1971 | #826 | 168 | 0.0101% |
| 1970 | #782 | 181 | 0.0104% |
| 1969 | #893 | 139 | 0.0082% |
| 1968 | #1,082 | 97 | 0.0059% |
| 1967 | #1,030 | 100 | 0.0061% |
| 1966 | #1,067 | 97 | 0.0057% |
| 1965 | #990 | 110 | 0.0062% |
| 1964 | #934 | 127 | 0.0067% |
| 1963 | #900 | 136 | 0.0071% |
| 1962 | #962 | 122 | 0.0062% |
| 1961 | #891 | 146 | 0.0072% |
| 1960 | #981 | 119 | 0.0059% |
| 1959 | #992 | 114 | 0.0056% |
| 1958 | #927 | 124 | 0.0062% |
| 1957 | #982 | 112 | 0.0055% |
| 1956 | #1,045 | 96 | 0.0048% |
| 1955 | #970 | 105 | 0.0054% |
| 1954 | #982 | 99 | 0.0051% |
| 1953 | #991 | 94 | 0.0050% |
| 1952 | #927 | 100 | 0.0054% |
| 1951 | #873 | 106 | 0.0059% |
| 1950 | #903 | 97 | 0.0057% |
| 1949 | #826 | 113 | 0.0066% |
| 1948 | #870 | 101 | 0.0059% |
| 1947 | #776 | 123 | 0.0069% |
| 1946 | #806 | 105 | 0.0067% |
| 1945 | #827 | 83 | 0.0063% |
| 1944 | #885 | 75 | 0.0057% |
| 1943 | #820 | 90 | 0.0065% |
| 1942 | #791 | 93 | 0.0069% |
| 1941 | #764 | 89 | 0.0074% |
| 1940 | #736 | 89 | 0.0078% |
| 1939 | #715 | 91 | 0.0083% |
| 1938 | #710 | 94 | 0.0085% |
| 1937 | #686 | 99 | 0.0093% |
| 1936 | #691 | 94 | 0.0090% |
| 1935 | #818 | 70 | 0.0067% |
| 1934 | #619 | 115 | 0.0110% |
| 1933 | #651 | 102 | 0.0101% |
| 1932 | #627 | 114 | 0.0107% |
| 1931 | #637 | 110 | 0.0103% |
| 1930 | #727 | 93 | 0.0083% |
| 1929 | #674 | 108 | 0.0097% |
| 1928 | #589 | 143 | 0.0124% |
| 1927 | #600 | 141 | 0.0118% |
| 1926 | #605 | 138 | 0.0116% |
| 1925 | #621 | 140 | 0.0115% |
| 1924 | #581 | 161 | 0.0129% |
| 1923 | #584 | 152 | 0.0126% |
| 1922 | #616 | 141 | 0.0117% |
| 1921 | #531 | 179 | 0.0145% |
| 1920 | #513 | 185 | 0.0154% |
| 1919 | #551 | 157 | 0.0139% |
| 1918 | #552 | 164 | 0.0142% |
| 1917 | #537 | 156 | 0.0144% |
| 1916 | #580 | 135 | 0.0129% |
| 1915 | #529 | 143 | 0.0145% |
| 1914 | #525 | 114 | 0.0150% |
| 1913 | #493 | 107 | 0.0171% |
| 1912 | #494 | 93 | 0.0167% |
| 1911 | #551 | 59 | 0.0141% |
| 1910 | #606 | 48 | 0.0121% |
| 1909 | #600 | 42 | 0.0121% |
| 1908 | #606 | 39 | 0.0117% |
| 1907 | #608 | 38 | 0.0119% |
| 1906 | #532 | 43 | 0.0146% |
| 1905 | #647 | 30 | 0.0103% |
| 1904 | #583 | 34 | 0.0123% |
| 1903 | #702 | 23 | 0.0088% |
| 1902 | #679 | 25 | 0.0095% |
| 1901 | #654 | 24 | 0.0100% |
| 1900 | #846 | 20 | 0.0067% |
| 1899 | #586 | 28 | 0.0120% |
| 1898 | #602 | 29 | 0.0112% |
| 1897 | #843 | 15 | 0.0064% |
| 1896 | #885 | 14 | 0.0059% |
| 1895 | #634 | 24 | 0.0103% |
| 1894 | #825 | 14 | 0.0063% |
| 1893 | #928 | 11 | 0.0052% |
| 1892 | #937 | 11 | 0.0052% |
| 1891 | #653 | 17 | 0.0092% |
| 1890 | #746 | 14 | 0.0074% |
| 1889 | #1,076 | 7 | 0.0039% |
| 1888 | #993 | 8 | 0.0045% |
| 1887 | #904 | 8 | 0.0055% |
| 1886 | #752 | 10 | 0.0069% |
| 1885 | #776 | 9 | 0.0068% |
| 1884 | #706 | 10 | 0.0078% |
| 1883 | #980 | 5 | 0.0045% |
| 1882 | #655 | 9 | 0.0083% |
| 1881 | #605 | 9 | 0.0098% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | #13,199 | 5 | 0.0003% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.