Fun Facts About the Name Isabel
- More than 133 thousand babies named Isabel: U.S. records list 133,960 babies given the name Isabel from 1880 through 2025. Even 1,827 boys received the name Isabel - about 1 boy for every 72 girls.
What Does the Name Isabel Mean?
Isabel is a form of the name Elizabeth, and it shares Elizabeth's traditional meaning, "God is my oath." The name ultimately comes from the Hebrew Elisheva, which is usually understood as combining El, a word for God, with a second element related to an oath. The same Hebrew name passed into Greek as Elisabet and into Latin as Elisabeth, the source of Elizabeth and its many European variants.
Isabel is not a separate etymological invention; it is a medieval variant of that Elizabeth family, developed in Romance-speaking regions and later established in Spanish, Portuguese, and English. The customary translation "God is my oath" depends on one reading of the Hebrew second element. Because that element is also sometimes explained as "seven" or "abundance," the precise literal sense of the original name is not certain, though the Elizabeth connection is well established.
Isabel Name History & Origins
Isabel arose in medieval Europe as a variant of Elizabeth. The form is found in Old French and Occitan as Isabel, and it also appears in Spain, Portugal, and England. The exact route by which the Elizabeth form became Isabel is not fully documented; it is generally treated as a medieval Romance-language variant rather than a separate root.
In Spain the name is written Isabel. Queen Isabella I of Castile (1451 - 1504), known in Spanish as Isabel, is a notable historical bearer; through Spanish and Portuguese colonization the name later spread to the Americas. In England, Isabel was used in the Middle Ages as a name in its own right, distinct from Elizabeth, and it remained in use in later centuries. Related forms include Isabella, Isabelle, and Isobel; Isabella is especially associated with Italian and Spanish usage. The name also appears in later literature, for example as the given name of Isabel Archer in Henry James's The Portrait of a Lady (1881), but that literary use is much later than the name's medieval history and did not create it.
How Popular is the Name Isabel?
Isabel recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 2006. Isabel entered the top 100 U.S. girl names in 1999.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #177 | 1,746 | 0.1086% |
| 2024 | #167 | 1,820 | 0.1128% |
| 2023 | #164 | 1,751 | 0.1093% |
| 2022 | #156 | 1,857 | 0.1133% |
| 2021 | #146 | 1,916 | 0.1168% |
| 2020 | #157 | 1,771 | 0.1096% |
| 2019 | #134 | 2,059 | 0.1227% |
| 2018 | #139 | 2,068 | 0.1216% |
| 2017 | #145 | 2,036 | 0.1180% |
| 2016 | #145 | 2,119 | 0.1196% |
| 2015 | #149 | 2,176 | 0.1219% |
| 2014 | #144 | 2,331 | 0.1305% |
| 2013 | #136 | 2,340 | 0.1334% |
| 2012 | #135 | 2,383 | 0.1353% |
| 2011 | #128 | 2,413 | 0.1372% |
| 2010 | #116 | 2,659 | 0.1496% |
| 2009 | #110 | 2,986 | 0.1626% |
| 2008 | #97 | 3,489 | 0.1845% |
| 2007 | #87 | 3,864 | 0.2010% |
| 2006 | #87 | 4,009 | 0.2109% |
| 2005 | #89 | 3,611 | 0.1954% |
| 2004 | #88 | 3,638 | 0.1981% |
| 2003 | #83 | 3,853 | 0.2109% |
| 2002 | #85 | 3,650 | 0.2031% |
| 2001 | #88 | 3,491 | 0.1939% |
| 2000 | #94 | 3,447 | 0.1898% |
| 1999 | #97 | 3,405 | 0.1920% |
| 1998 | #118 | 2,827 | 0.1600% |
| 1997 | #141 | 2,259 | 0.1298% |
| 1996 | #197 | 1,470 | 0.0839% |
| 1995 | #217 | 1,297 | 0.0738% |
| 1994 | #244 | 1,131 | 0.0633% |
| 1993 | #257 | 1,076 | 0.0595% |
| 1992 | #267 | 1,053 | 0.0571% |
| 1991 | #330 | 801 | 0.0427% |
| 1990 | #339 | 785 | 0.0413% |
| 1989 | #404 | 613 | 0.0333% |
| 1988 | #419 | 558 | 0.0313% |
| 1987 | #445 | 494 | 0.0284% |
| 1986 | #447 | 483 | 0.0282% |
| 1985 | #426 | 516 | 0.0300% |
| 1984 | #483 | 419 | 0.0249% |
| 1983 | #469 | 429 | 0.0257% |
| 1982 | #442 | 487 | 0.0288% |
| 1981 | #460 | 466 | 0.0279% |
| 1980 | #435 | 497 | 0.0299% |
| 1979 | #481 | 424 | 0.0264% |
| 1978 | #511 | 365 | 0.0238% |
| 1977 | #484 | 393 | 0.0256% |
| 1976 | #464 | 411 | 0.0281% |
| 1975 | #463 | 408 | 0.0280% |
| 1974 | #473 | 381 | 0.0260% |
| 1973 | #494 | 352 | 0.0241% |
| 1972 | #498 | 356 | 0.0234% |
| 1971 | #464 | 436 | 0.0262% |
| 1970 | #483 | 415 | 0.0237% |
| 1969 | #496 | 384 | 0.0228% |
| 1968 | #497 | 381 | 0.0232% |
| 1967 | #505 | 352 | 0.0213% |
| 1966 | #498 | 353 | 0.0209% |
| 1965 | #527 | 327 | 0.0185% |
| 1964 | #494 | 389 | 0.0205% |
| 1963 | #499 | 380 | 0.0197% |
| 1962 | #489 | 393 | 0.0200% |
| 1961 | #511 | 366 | 0.0181% |
| 1960 | #492 | 391 | 0.0193% |
| 1959 | #492 | 390 | 0.0193% |
| 1958 | #507 | 359 | 0.0178% |
| 1957 | #449 | 440 | 0.0215% |
| 1956 | #456 | 405 | 0.0202% |
| 1955 | #417 | 450 | 0.0230% |
| 1954 | #461 | 368 | 0.0190% |
| 1953 | #390 | 480 | 0.0255% |
| 1952 | #411 | 419 | 0.0226% |
| 1951 | #438 | 368 | 0.0204% |
| 1950 | #421 | 362 | 0.0211% |
| 1949 | #402 | 394 | 0.0230% |
| 1948 | #409 | 374 | 0.0220% |
| 1947 | #415 | 378 | 0.0213% |
| 1946 | #410 | 353 | 0.0225% |
| 1945 | #430 | 275 | 0.0210% |
| 1944 | #408 | 309 | 0.0233% |
| 1943 | #387 | 356 | 0.0255% |
| 1942 | #391 | 333 | 0.0247% |
| 1941 | #367 | 335 | 0.0277% |
| 1940 | #360 | 328 | 0.0287% |
| 1939 | #345 | 340 | 0.0310% |
| 1938 | #343 | 350 | 0.0317% |
| 1937 | #310 | 399 | 0.0375% |
| 1936 | #312 | 376 | 0.0361% |
| 1935 | #292 | 425 | 0.0405% |
| 1934 | #300 | 430 | 0.0412% |
| 1933 | #284 | 450 | 0.0446% |
| 1932 | #272 | 516 | 0.0484% |
| 1931 | #258 | 561 | 0.0527% |
| 1930 | #257 | 595 | 0.0528% |
| 1929 | #235 | 672 | 0.0602% |
| 1928 | #248 | 651 | 0.0564% |
| 1927 | #239 | 731 | 0.0613% |
| 1926 | #238 | 744 | 0.0628% |
| 1925 | #212 | 900 | 0.0739% |
| 1924 | #215 | 911 | 0.0729% |
| 1923 | #221 | 855 | 0.0709% |
| 1922 | #218 | 888 | 0.0739% |
| 1921 | #207 | 971 | 0.0787% |
| 1920 | #199 | 992 | 0.0828% |
| 1919 | #196 | 957 | 0.0847% |
| 1918 | #190 | 1,041 | 0.0899% |
| 1917 | #198 | 931 | 0.0861% |
| 1916 | #183 | 1,000 | 0.0958% |
| 1915 | #177 | 943 | 0.0958% |
| 1914 | #179 | 747 | 0.0981% |
| 1913 | #177 | 657 | 0.1052% |
| 1912 | #175 | 556 | 0.0996% |
| 1911 | #168 | 447 | 0.1069% |
| 1910 | #176 | 389 | 0.0981% |
| 1909 | #169 | 356 | 0.1025% |
| 1908 | #169 | 351 | 0.1050% |
| 1907 | #170 | 326 | 0.1023% |
| 1906 | #169 | 317 | 0.1073% |
| 1905 | #176 | 292 | 0.1001% |
| 1904 | #180 | 271 | 0.0984% |
| 1903 | #180 | 257 | 0.0981% |
| 1902 | #179 | 256 | 0.0969% |
| 1901 | #195 | 214 | 0.0894% |
| 1900 | #185 | 286 | 0.0954% |
| 1899 | #177 | 243 | 0.1043% |
| 1898 | #184 | 252 | 0.0974% |
| 1897 | #188 | 210 | 0.0897% |
| 1896 | #179 | 232 | 0.0975% |
| 1895 | #184 | 212 | 0.0907% |
| 1894 | #168 | 241 | 0.1081% |
| 1893 | #186 | 189 | 0.0888% |
| 1892 | #200 | 158 | 0.0744% |
| 1891 | #189 | 150 | 0.0809% |
| 1890 | #186 | 160 | 0.0840% |
| 1889 | #186 | 153 | 0.0858% |
| 1888 | #187 | 144 | 0.0806% |
| 1887 | #192 | 109 | 0.0747% |
| 1886 | #177 | 131 | 0.0906% |
| 1885 | #185 | 102 | 0.0767% |
| 1884 | #176 | 102 | 0.0791% |
| 1883 | #182 | 83 | 0.0739% |
| 1882 | #194 | 72 | 0.0668% |
| 1881 | #174 | 76 | 0.0827% |
| 1880 | #161 | 81 | 0.0890% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | #13,087 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2019 | #12,888 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2016 | #12,957 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2014 | #12,795 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2013 | #10,062 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2010 | #11,266 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2008 | #11,602 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2007 | #13,090 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 2006 | #7,642 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 2005 | #7,889 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2004 | #5,592 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 2003 | #6,916 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 2002 | #7,266 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 2001 | #7,824 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2000 | #5,707 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1999 | #4,869 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1998 | #6,509 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1997 | #7,591 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1996 | #5,324 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1995 | #4,915 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1994 | #4,911 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1993 | #3,297 | 20 | 0.0010% |
| 1992 | #3,049 | 22 | 0.0011% |
| 1991 | #3,524 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1990 | #3,367 | 18 | 0.0009% |
| 1989 | #3,141 | 19 | 0.0009% |
| 1988 | #5,410 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1987 | #2,593 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 1986 | #3,728 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1985 | #2,761 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 1984 | #3,349 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1983 | #2,983 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 1982 | #4,769 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1981 | #3,108 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1980 | #3,494 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1979 | #3,435 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1978 | #2,846 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 1977 | #2,829 | 15 | 0.0009% |
| 1976 | #2,281 | 20 | 0.0013% |
| 1975 | #2,246 | 20 | 0.0013% |
| 1974 | #3,677 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 1973 | #4,258 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1972 | #3,235 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1971 | #2,161 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1970 | #2,165 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 1969 | #2,766 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1968 | #2,649 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1967 | #2,286 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1966 | #2,701 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1965 | #2,028 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1964 | #2,156 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 1963 | #2,360 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1962 | #2,746 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1961 | #1,842 | 20 | 0.0009% |
| 1960 | #2,166 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1959 | #1,833 | 20 | 0.0009% |
| 1958 | #2,130 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1957 | #2,318 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1956 | #1,585 | 25 | 0.0012% |
| 1955 | #2,086 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1954 | #1,924 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1953 | #1,864 | 18 | 0.0009% |
| 1952 | #1,827 | 18 | 0.0009% |
| 1951 | #1,803 | 18 | 0.0010% |
| 1950 | #1,972 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 1949 | #1,478 | 25 | 0.0014% |
| 1948 | #1,286 | 32 | 0.0018% |
| 1947 | #1,575 | 23 | 0.0013% |
| 1946 | #1,314 | 29 | 0.0018% |
| 1945 | #1,510 | 20 | 0.0015% |
| 1944 | #1,504 | 21 | 0.0015% |
| 1943 | #1,507 | 22 | 0.0015% |
| 1942 | #1,203 | 34 | 0.0025% |
| 1941 | #1,317 | 26 | 0.0021% |
| 1940 | #1,298 | 27 | 0.0023% |
| 1939 | #1,604 | 18 | 0.0016% |
| 1938 | #1,259 | 28 | 0.0025% |
| 1937 | #1,469 | 22 | 0.0021% |
| 1936 | #1,107 | 35 | 0.0034% |
| 1935 | #1,309 | 27 | 0.0026% |
| 1934 | #1,370 | 25 | 0.0024% |
| 1933 | #1,565 | 20 | 0.0020% |
| 1932 | #1,559 | 21 | 0.0020% |
| 1931 | #1,205 | 33 | 0.0032% |
| 1930 | #1,243 | 33 | 0.0030% |
| 1929 | #1,182 | 35 | 0.0033% |
| 1928 | #1,176 | 37 | 0.0033% |
| 1927 | #1,139 | 40 | 0.0035% |
| 1926 | #1,311 | 31 | 0.0028% |
| 1925 | #1,155 | 38 | 0.0034% |
| 1924 | #1,211 | 36 | 0.0032% |
| 1923 | #2,174 | 15 | 0.0014% |
| 1922 | #1,672 | 22 | 0.0020% |
| 1921 | #1,308 | 32 | 0.0029% |
| 1920 | #1,361 | 29 | 0.0027% |
| 1919 | #1,506 | 24 | 0.0024% |
| 1918 | #1,789 | 19 | 0.0019% |
| 1917 | #1,861 | 17 | 0.0018% |
| 1916 | #2,459 | 11 | 0.0012% |
| 1915 | #2,118 | 13 | 0.0015% |
| 1914 | #2,354 | 9 | 0.0014% |
| 1913 | #2,638 | 6 | 0.0012% |
| 1912 | #1,679 | 10 | 0.0023% |
| 1911 | #1,158 | 10 | 0.0044% |
| 1910 | #1,078 | 10 | 0.0051% |
| 1906 | #1,328 | 5 | 0.0038% |
| 1904 | #1,137 | 6 | 0.0047% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.