Fun Facts About the Name Georgia
- Back among the favorites: Georgia returned to the U.S. top 100 in 1883 and stayed there for 1 consecutive years, through 2025.
- More than 166 thousand babies named Georgia: U.S. records list 166,999 babies given the name Georgia from 1880 through 2025. Even 729 boys received the name Georgia - about 1 boy for every 228 girls.
What Does the Name Georgia Mean?
Georgia is the feminine form of George. It goes back to the Greek name Geōrgios (Γεώργιος), which comes from geōrgos (γεωργός), "farmer" or "earth-worker." That noun joins gē (γῆ), "earth," to ergon (ἔργον), "work," so the literal sense is a person who works the land - a tiller of the soil. The meaning is occupational rather than symbolic; the "earth" element refers to soil and farming, not to the planet.
Georgios passed into Latin as Georgius, and the feminine form Georgia was built from it. English received the name through Latin and, for the masculine form, through Old French Georges.
Georgia Name History & Origins
The masculine Geōrgios was a common name in the Greek-speaking world and spread along with Christianity. Saint George, a soldier said to have been martyred around 303, became one of the most widely honored saints, and devotion to him carried the name into Latin as Georgius and then into the languages of western Europe. Through Old French Georges, it entered English as George.
Feminine forms developed alongside the masculine one: Greek Geōrgia and Latin Georgia. Other feminines of the same root in English and French include Georgiana, Georgina, and the French-derived Georgette. Georgia has been used as a given name in the English-speaking world since at least the 18th century.
The place name Georgia is a separate matter. The British colony founded in 1732 was named for King George II, and the country of Georgia in the Caucasus has a different, disputed origin for its English name.
How Popular is the Name Georgia?
Georgia has a rich multi-era history in the U.S. top 100, spanning 33 total years and enjoying its modern revival from 2025 to 2025.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #99 | 2,619 | 0.1629% |
| 2024 | #110 | 2,458 | 0.1524% |
| 2023 | #128 | 2,167 | 0.1352% |
| 2022 | #164 | 1,753 | 0.1070% |
| 2021 | #168 | 1,743 | 0.1063% |
| 2020 | #177 | 1,614 | 0.0999% |
| 2019 | #204 | 1,481 | 0.0883% |
| 2018 | #221 | 1,423 | 0.0837% |
| 2017 | #242 | 1,321 | 0.0765% |
| 2016 | #226 | 1,418 | 0.0800% |
| 2015 | #230 | 1,441 | 0.0807% |
| 2014 | #242 | 1,333 | 0.0746% |
| 2013 | #251 | 1,264 | 0.0720% |
| 2012 | #297 | 1,067 | 0.0606% |
| 2011 | #305 | 1,048 | 0.0596% |
| 2010 | #324 | 989 | 0.0556% |
| 2009 | #335 | 982 | 0.0535% |
| 2008 | #312 | 1,073 | 0.0568% |
| 2007 | #295 | 1,143 | 0.0595% |
| 2006 | #274 | 1,215 | 0.0639% |
| 2005 | #319 | 1,007 | 0.0545% |
| 2004 | #366 | 854 | 0.0465% |
| 2003 | #374 | 810 | 0.0443% |
| 2002 | #379 | 782 | 0.0435% |
| 2001 | #393 | 743 | 0.0413% |
| 2000 | #334 | 929 | 0.0512% |
| 1999 | #350 | 858 | 0.0484% |
| 1998 | #428 | 619 | 0.0350% |
| 1997 | #529 | 449 | 0.0258% |
| 1996 | #582 | 394 | 0.0225% |
| 1995 | #607 | 367 | 0.0209% |
| 1994 | #638 | 342 | 0.0192% |
| 1993 | #621 | 365 | 0.0202% |
| 1992 | #597 | 382 | 0.0207% |
| 1991 | #675 | 319 | 0.0170% |
| 1990 | #716 | 293 | 0.0154% |
| 1989 | #718 | 276 | 0.0150% |
| 1988 | #647 | 303 | 0.0170% |
| 1987 | #698 | 262 | 0.0151% |
| 1986 | #724 | 246 | 0.0143% |
| 1985 | #669 | 271 | 0.0157% |
| 1984 | #602 | 297 | 0.0176% |
| 1983 | #588 | 303 | 0.0181% |
| 1982 | #632 | 285 | 0.0168% |
| 1981 | #600 | 307 | 0.0184% |
| 1980 | #559 | 333 | 0.0201% |
| 1979 | #523 | 367 | 0.0229% |
| 1978 | #527 | 349 | 0.0228% |
| 1977 | #505 | 367 | 0.0239% |
| 1976 | #520 | 342 | 0.0233% |
| 1975 | #512 | 350 | 0.0240% |
| 1974 | #486 | 363 | 0.0247% |
| 1973 | #474 | 382 | 0.0262% |
| 1972 | #442 | 429 | 0.0282% |
| 1971 | #443 | 472 | 0.0284% |
| 1970 | #434 | 508 | 0.0291% |
| 1969 | #402 | 565 | 0.0335% |
| 1968 | #380 | 581 | 0.0354% |
| 1967 | #344 | 672 | 0.0407% |
| 1966 | #352 | 657 | 0.0388% |
| 1965 | #338 | 719 | 0.0407% |
| 1964 | #316 | 871 | 0.0460% |
| 1963 | #307 | 905 | 0.0470% |
| 1962 | #307 | 909 | 0.0462% |
| 1961 | #290 | 1,031 | 0.0511% |
| 1960 | #293 | 987 | 0.0488% |
| 1959 | #280 | 1,013 | 0.0501% |
| 1958 | #263 | 1,112 | 0.0553% |
| 1957 | #239 | 1,251 | 0.0612% |
| 1956 | #229 | 1,306 | 0.0650% |
| 1955 | #210 | 1,480 | 0.0757% |
| 1954 | #200 | 1,534 | 0.0790% |
| 1953 | #181 | 1,743 | 0.0926% |
| 1952 | #176 | 1,749 | 0.0943% |
| 1951 | #162 | 1,931 | 0.1072% |
| 1950 | #152 | 1,940 | 0.1132% |
| 1949 | #141 | 2,204 | 0.1288% |
| 1948 | #130 | 2,312 | 0.1362% |
| 1947 | #129 | 2,475 | 0.1396% |
| 1946 | #123 | 2,309 | 0.1469% |
| 1945 | #116 | 2,318 | 0.1773% |
| 1944 | #114 | 2,359 | 0.1777% |
| 1943 | #119 | 2,378 | 0.1704% |
| 1942 | #123 | 2,213 | 0.1638% |
| 1941 | #127 | 2,051 | 0.1698% |
| 1940 | #138 | 1,774 | 0.1551% |
| 1939 | #131 | 1,834 | 0.1672% |
| 1938 | #138 | 1,762 | 0.1597% |
| 1937 | #132 | 1,812 | 0.1703% |
| 1936 | #128 | 1,823 | 0.1752% |
| 1935 | #123 | 1,871 | 0.1784% |
| 1934 | #122 | 1,918 | 0.1837% |
| 1933 | #126 | 1,814 | 0.1800% |
| 1932 | #118 | 2,064 | 0.1934% |
| 1931 | #120 | 1,960 | 0.1841% |
| 1930 | #117 | 2,156 | 0.1915% |
| 1929 | #116 | 2,127 | 0.1905% |
| 1928 | #115 | 2,289 | 0.1985% |
| 1927 | #120 | 2,254 | 0.1890% |
| 1926 | #116 | 2,348 | 0.1981% |
| 1925 | #112 | 2,411 | 0.1980% |
| 1924 | #113 | 2,397 | 0.1919% |
| 1923 | #112 | 2,372 | 0.1966% |
| 1922 | #114 | 2,363 | 0.1968% |
| 1921 | #117 | 2,313 | 0.1876% |
| 1920 | #113 | 2,356 | 0.1966% |
| 1919 | #106 | 2,284 | 0.2021% |
| 1918 | #107 | 2,344 | 0.2025% |
| 1917 | #105 | 2,163 | 0.2000% |
| 1916 | #108 | 1,992 | 0.1907% |
| 1915 | #111 | 1,853 | 0.1883% |
| 1914 | #107 | 1,492 | 0.1959% |
| 1913 | #100 | 1,382 | 0.2213% |
| 1912 | #101 | 1,196 | 0.2143% |
| 1911 | #96 | 957 | 0.2288% |
| 1910 | #91 | 1,010 | 0.2547% |
| 1909 | #97 | 813 | 0.2341% |
| 1908 | #97 | 768 | 0.2297% |
| 1907 | #92 | 787 | 0.2470% |
| 1906 | #96 | 706 | 0.2391% |
| 1905 | #94 | 722 | 0.2476% |
| 1904 | #89 | 736 | 0.2673% |
| 1903 | #94 | 632 | 0.2412% |
| 1902 | #91 | 664 | 0.2514% |
| 1901 | #96 | 549 | 0.2294% |
| 1900 | #87 | 765 | 0.2552% |
| 1899 | #99 | 553 | 0.2373% |
| 1898 | #92 | 654 | 0.2527% |
| 1897 | #101 | 529 | 0.2259% |
| 1896 | #93 | 562 | 0.2362% |
| 1895 | #94 | 562 | 0.2406% |
| 1894 | #94 | 535 | 0.2400% |
| 1893 | #87 | 541 | 0.2541% |
| 1892 | #87 | 552 | 0.2600% |
| 1891 | #96 | 444 | 0.2394% |
| 1890 | #83 | 513 | 0.2695% |
| 1889 | #91 | 445 | 0.2495% |
| 1888 | #84 | 477 | 0.2670% |
| 1887 | #92 | 351 | 0.2404% |
| 1886 | #86 | 395 | 0.2733% |
| 1885 | #84 | 371 | 0.2788% |
| 1884 | #90 | 341 | 0.2643% |
| 1883 | #84 | 325 | 0.2893% |
| 1882 | #81 | 320 | 0.2967% |
| 1881 | #89 | 256 | 0.2784% |
| 1880 | #84 | 259 | 0.2846% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | #5,314 | 9 | 0.0004% |
| 1983 | #6,619 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1982 | #6,698 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1977 | #5,371 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1964 | #4,261 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1963 | #4,272 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1962 | #3,785 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1960 | #4,252 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1958 | #2,706 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1957 | #3,715 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1956 | #3,051 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1955 | #3,054 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1954 | #4,028 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1952 | #3,197 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1951 | #2,552 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1950 | #3,457 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1949 | #2,159 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1948 | #2,257 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1947 | #3,499 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1946 | #2,326 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 1945 | #2,461 | 9 | 0.0007% |
| 1944 | #2,029 | 13 | 0.0010% |
| 1943 | #2,107 | 13 | 0.0009% |
| 1942 | #1,825 | 16 | 0.0012% |
| 1941 | #1,715 | 17 | 0.0014% |
| 1940 | #2,229 | 11 | 0.0009% |
| 1939 | #2,339 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1938 | #1,924 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1937 | #1,713 | 17 | 0.0016% |
| 1936 | #1,992 | 13 | 0.0013% |
| 1935 | #2,172 | 12 | 0.0012% |
| 1934 | #1,632 | 19 | 0.0018% |
| 1933 | #2,139 | 12 | 0.0012% |
| 1932 | #1,678 | 19 | 0.0018% |
| 1931 | #2,142 | 13 | 0.0013% |
| 1930 | #1,917 | 16 | 0.0015% |
| 1929 | #1,752 | 19 | 0.0018% |
| 1928 | #1,398 | 28 | 0.0025% |
| 1927 | #3,585 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1926 | #1,858 | 18 | 0.0016% |
| 1925 | #1,758 | 20 | 0.0018% |
| 1924 | #1,863 | 19 | 0.0017% |
| 1923 | #1,779 | 20 | 0.0018% |
| 1922 | #2,280 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1921 | #2,874 | 10 | 0.0009% |
| 1920 | #1,913 | 18 | 0.0017% |
| 1919 | #1,546 | 23 | 0.0023% |
| 1918 | #1,935 | 17 | 0.0017% |
| 1917 | #2,481 | 11 | 0.0012% |
| 1916 | #2,442 | 11 | 0.0012% |
| 1915 | #2,364 | 11 | 0.0013% |
| 1914 | #1,721 | 14 | 0.0021% |
| 1913 | #1,996 | 9 | 0.0018% |
| 1912 | #1,944 | 8 | 0.0019% |
| 1911 | #1,444 | 7 | 0.0031% |
| 1909 | #1,349 | 6 | 0.0037% |
| 1907 | #1,137 | 7 | 0.0048% |
| 1906 | #1,053 | 7 | 0.0053% |
| 1904 | #1,278 | 5 | 0.0039% |
| 1900 | #1,092 | 7 | 0.0047% |
| 1898 | #834 | 8 | 0.0065% |
| 1897 | #817 | 8 | 0.0071% |
| 1895 | #1,149 | 5 | 0.0043% |
| 1893 | #1,100 | 5 | 0.0045% |
| 1892 | #1,135 | 5 | 0.0041% |
| 1888 | #1,091 | 5 | 0.0041% |
| 1884 | #1,032 | 5 | 0.0044% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.