Fun Facts About the Name Francis
- Decades of popularity: Francis stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 76 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1955.
- More than 320 thousand babies named Francis: U.S. records list 320,321 babies given the name Francis from 1880 through 2025. Even 29,832 girls received the name Francis - about 1 girl for every 10 boys.
What Does the Name Francis Mean?
Francis is an English masculine given name. It comes from Medieval Latin Franciscus, a form meaning "Frankish" or "French," which derives from Francus, the Latin name for a Frank. The Franks were a Germanic people; the ultimate origin of their name is uncertain, but it may be linked to a Germanic word for a spear or javelin, or to a root meaning "bold" or "fierce." In Medieval Latin, francus also came to mean "free," since Franks had free status, and this later sense is the source of the common explanation of Francis as "free man." The literal sense is "Frenchman" or "Frankish"; "free man" is a customary interpretation built on the same Latin root.
Francis Name History & Origins
The name began as a byname in medieval Europe. Latin Franciscus was used for a person from France or of Frankish descent. Its most famous medieval bearer was Saint Francis of Assisi (1181/1182 - 1226), born Giovanni di Pietro di Bernardone. He was called Francesco, meaning "Frenchman" or "the Frank"; accounts differ on why, mentioning his father's business in France, French connections in the family, or his own fondness for French language and song. The Franciscan order he founded helped make the name familiar throughout Catholic Europe, where it took forms such as Italian Francesco, Spanish Francisco, French François, German Franz, and Dutch Frans. In English, Francis was in use in the medieval period and became more established in the 16th century; it was borne by figures such as the navigator Sir Francis Drake and the philosopher Francis Bacon. The feminine form Frances developed alongside it from the same Latin source.
How Popular is the Name Francis?
Francis remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1955. Its highest annual birth count was in 1918, and people born that year turn 108 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,685 | 122 | 0.0076% |
| 2024 | #2,083 | 92 | 0.0057% |
| 2023 | #2,023 | 97 | 0.0061% |
| 2022 | #2,587 | 68 | 0.0041% |
| 2021 | #2,136 | 88 | 0.0054% |
| 2020 | #2,290 | 78 | 0.0048% |
| 2019 | #2,094 | 90 | 0.0054% |
| 2018 | #2,409 | 75 | 0.0044% |
| 2017 | #2,343 | 78 | 0.0045% |
| 2016 | #2,328 | 81 | 0.0046% |
| 2015 | #2,752 | 64 | 0.0036% |
| 2014 | #2,722 | 64 | 0.0036% |
| 2013 | #2,918 | 58 | 0.0033% |
| 2012 | #3,601 | 44 | 0.0025% |
| 2011 | #3,187 | 52 | 0.0030% |
| 2010 | #3,537 | 45 | 0.0025% |
| 2009 | #3,136 | 54 | 0.0029% |
| 2008 | #2,594 | 72 | 0.0038% |
| 2007 | #2,466 | 76 | 0.0040% |
| 2006 | #2,862 | 61 | 0.0032% |
| 2005 | #2,643 | 64 | 0.0035% |
| 2004 | #2,405 | 71 | 0.0039% |
| 2003 | #2,110 | 83 | 0.0045% |
| 2002 | #1,828 | 98 | 0.0055% |
| 2001 | #1,865 | 94 | 0.0052% |
| 2000 | #1,544 | 116 | 0.0064% |
| 1999 | #1,477 | 117 | 0.0066% |
| 1998 | #1,421 | 121 | 0.0068% |
| 1997 | #1,469 | 112 | 0.0064% |
| 1996 | #1,275 | 136 | 0.0078% |
| 1995 | #1,102 | 161 | 0.0092% |
| 1994 | #1,272 | 134 | 0.0075% |
| 1993 | #1,254 | 137 | 0.0076% |
| 1992 | #1,210 | 144 | 0.0078% |
| 1991 | #1,109 | 162 | 0.0086% |
| 1990 | #1,112 | 157 | 0.0083% |
| 1989 | #1,153 | 143 | 0.0078% |
| 1988 | #1,087 | 145 | 0.0081% |
| 1987 | #961 | 166 | 0.0095% |
| 1986 | #1,098 | 135 | 0.0079% |
| 1985 | #1,067 | 138 | 0.0080% |
| 1984 | #1,105 | 125 | 0.0074% |
| 1983 | #1,140 | 117 | 0.0070% |
| 1982 | #981 | 151 | 0.0089% |
| 1981 | #960 | 153 | 0.0092% |
| 1980 | #968 | 153 | 0.0092% |
| 1979 | #1,120 | 120 | 0.0075% |
| 1978 | #1,011 | 135 | 0.0088% |
| 1977 | #967 | 143 | 0.0093% |
| 1976 | #983 | 130 | 0.0089% |
| 1975 | #938 | 135 | 0.0093% |
| 1974 | #1,050 | 113 | 0.0077% |
| 1973 | #1,016 | 115 | 0.0079% |
| 1972 | #994 | 120 | 0.0079% |
| 1971 | #969 | 131 | 0.0079% |
| 1970 | #929 | 138 | 0.0079% |
| 1969 | #869 | 145 | 0.0086% |
| 1968 | #933 | 123 | 0.0075% |
| 1967 | #930 | 122 | 0.0074% |
| 1966 | #906 | 124 | 0.0073% |
| 1965 | #910 | 123 | 0.0070% |
| 1964 | #901 | 134 | 0.0071% |
| 1963 | #849 | 152 | 0.0079% |
| 1962 | #783 | 177 | 0.0090% |
| 1961 | #730 | 203 | 0.0101% |
| 1960 | #728 | 193 | 0.0095% |
| 1959 | #751 | 183 | 0.0090% |
| 1958 | #756 | 173 | 0.0086% |
| 1957 | #704 | 200 | 0.0098% |
| 1956 | #726 | 178 | 0.0089% |
| 1955 | #658 | 202 | 0.0103% |
| 1954 | #600 | 228 | 0.0117% |
| 1953 | #608 | 213 | 0.0113% |
| 1952 | #543 | 250 | 0.0135% |
| 1951 | #554 | 233 | 0.0129% |
| 1950 | #509 | 254 | 0.0148% |
| 1949 | #508 | 256 | 0.0150% |
| 1948 | #505 | 263 | 0.0155% |
| 1947 | #478 | 297 | 0.0168% |
| 1946 | #485 | 262 | 0.0167% |
| 1945 | #455 | 245 | 0.0187% |
| 1944 | #399 | 316 | 0.0238% |
| 1943 | #413 | 312 | 0.0224% |
| 1942 | #417 | 295 | 0.0218% |
| 1941 | #383 | 318 | 0.0263% |
| 1940 | #370 | 317 | 0.0277% |
| 1939 | #381 | 299 | 0.0273% |
| 1938 | #380 | 305 | 0.0276% |
| 1937 | #367 | 312 | 0.0293% |
| 1936 | #353 | 319 | 0.0307% |
| 1935 | #323 | 381 | 0.0363% |
| 1934 | #336 | 355 | 0.0340% |
| 1933 | #329 | 366 | 0.0363% |
| 1932 | #319 | 399 | 0.0374% |
| 1931 | #331 | 373 | 0.0350% |
| 1930 | #307 | 467 | 0.0415% |
| 1929 | #310 | 473 | 0.0424% |
| 1928 | #271 | 571 | 0.0495% |
| 1927 | #279 | 565 | 0.0474% |
| 1926 | #259 | 652 | 0.0550% |
| 1925 | #259 | 660 | 0.0542% |
| 1924 | #257 | 646 | 0.0517% |
| 1923 | #258 | 622 | 0.0516% |
| 1922 | #264 | 607 | 0.0505% |
| 1921 | #258 | 661 | 0.0536% |
| 1920 | #259 | 653 | 0.0545% |
| 1919 | #247 | 673 | 0.0596% |
| 1918 | #253 | 653 | 0.0564% |
| 1917 | #248 | 627 | 0.0580% |
| 1916 | #265 | 519 | 0.0497% |
| 1915 | #261 | 503 | 0.0511% |
| 1914 | #263 | 385 | 0.0506% |
| 1913 | #270 | 299 | 0.0479% |
| 1912 | #272 | 273 | 0.0489% |
| 1911 | #253 | 234 | 0.0559% |
| 1910 | #254 | 227 | 0.0573% |
| 1909 | #288 | 157 | 0.0452% |
| 1908 | #275 | 166 | 0.0497% |
| 1907 | #272 | 162 | 0.0509% |
| 1906 | #281 | 139 | 0.0471% |
| 1905 | #268 | 149 | 0.0511% |
| 1904 | #291 | 122 | 0.0443% |
| 1903 | #300 | 109 | 0.0416% |
| 1902 | #262 | 140 | 0.0530% |
| 1901 | #258 | 126 | 0.0526% |
| 1900 | #257 | 159 | 0.0530% |
| 1899 | #294 | 101 | 0.0433% |
| 1898 | #274 | 124 | 0.0479% |
| 1897 | #266 | 115 | 0.0491% |
| 1896 | #269 | 114 | 0.0479% |
| 1895 | #250 | 126 | 0.0539% |
| 1894 | #264 | 108 | 0.0484% |
| 1893 | #257 | 107 | 0.0503% |
| 1892 | #257 | 106 | 0.0499% |
| 1891 | #261 | 88 | 0.0474% |
| 1890 | #246 | 101 | 0.0531% |
| 1889 | #249 | 88 | 0.0493% |
| 1888 | #247 | 88 | 0.0493% |
| 1887 | #234 | 82 | 0.0562% |
| 1886 | #225 | 81 | 0.0560% |
| 1885 | #250 | 66 | 0.0496% |
| 1884 | #261 | 56 | 0.0434% |
| 1883 | #244 | 54 | 0.0481% |
| 1882 | #235 | 54 | 0.0501% |
| 1881 | #229 | 47 | 0.0511% |
| 1880 | #206 | 55 | 0.0604% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #420 | 769 | 0.0450% |
| 2024 | #450 | 693 | 0.0404% |
| 2023 | #456 | 675 | 0.0395% |
| 2022 | #461 | 664 | 0.0381% |
| 2021 | #467 | 637 | 0.0364% |
| 2020 | #482 | 616 | 0.0357% |
| 2019 | #484 | 605 | 0.0337% |
| 2018 | #480 | 610 | 0.0336% |
| 2017 | #458 | 661 | 0.0357% |
| 2016 | #482 | 638 | 0.0336% |
| 2015 | #481 | 622 | 0.0325% |
| 2014 | #480 | 593 | 0.0309% |
| 2013 | #505 | 538 | 0.0284% |
| 2012 | #593 | 430 | 0.0227% |
| 2011 | #617 | 387 | 0.0204% |
| 2010 | #671 | 358 | 0.0187% |
| 2009 | #676 | 359 | 0.0181% |
| 2008 | #660 | 368 | 0.0180% |
| 2007 | #616 | 402 | 0.0194% |
| 2006 | #556 | 451 | 0.0219% |
| 2005 | #526 | 463 | 0.0232% |
| 2004 | #524 | 456 | 0.0230% |
| 2003 | #518 | 465 | 0.0235% |
| 2002 | #497 | 464 | 0.0239% |
| 2001 | #444 | 546 | 0.0281% |
| 2000 | #435 | 559 | 0.0285% |
| 1999 | #430 | 542 | 0.0282% |
| 1998 | #410 | 580 | 0.0303% |
| 1997 | #385 | 628 | 0.0333% |
| 1996 | #384 | 607 | 0.0320% |
| 1995 | #352 | 697 | 0.0366% |
| 1994 | #339 | 726 | 0.0376% |
| 1993 | #335 | 753 | 0.0384% |
| 1992 | #318 | 803 | 0.0402% |
| 1991 | #313 | 824 | 0.0408% |
| 1990 | #284 | 919 | 0.0447% |
| 1989 | #268 | 921 | 0.0460% |
| 1988 | #247 | 952 | 0.0497% |
| 1987 | #244 | 949 | 0.0508% |
| 1986 | #245 | 915 | 0.0497% |
| 1985 | #245 | 935 | 0.0506% |
| 1984 | #243 | 902 | 0.0500% |
| 1983 | #232 | 961 | 0.0536% |
| 1982 | #238 | 981 | 0.0541% |
| 1981 | #236 | 974 | 0.0544% |
| 1980 | #243 | 922 | 0.0517% |
| 1979 | #237 | 930 | 0.0540% |
| 1978 | #225 | 940 | 0.0572% |
| 1977 | #235 | 897 | 0.0546% |
| 1976 | #240 | 836 | 0.0533% |
| 1975 | #217 | 957 | 0.0613% |
| 1974 | #233 | 888 | 0.0565% |
| 1973 | #223 | 979 | 0.0628% |
| 1972 | #222 | 989 | 0.0610% |
| 1971 | #201 | 1,209 | 0.0684% |
| 1970 | #192 | 1,390 | 0.0748% |
| 1969 | #189 | 1,429 | 0.0799% |
| 1968 | #175 | 1,516 | 0.0872% |
| 1967 | #169 | 1,583 | 0.0908% |
| 1966 | #164 | 1,696 | 0.0951% |
| 1965 | #164 | 1,815 | 0.0976% |
| 1964 | #159 | 2,067 | 0.1037% |
| 1963 | #153 | 2,174 | 0.1071% |
| 1962 | #148 | 2,293 | 0.1108% |
| 1961 | #148 | 2,344 | 0.1104% |
| 1960 | #145 | 2,419 | 0.1135% |
| 1959 | #136 | 2,648 | 0.1241% |
| 1958 | #135 | 2,619 | 0.1234% |
| 1957 | #128 | 2,936 | 0.1361% |
| 1956 | #111 | 3,301 | 0.1561% |
| 1955 | #100 | 3,439 | 0.1670% |
| 1954 | #94 | 3,686 | 0.1808% |
| 1953 | #90 | 3,875 | 0.1965% |
| 1952 | #89 | 3,979 | 0.2047% |
| 1951 | #85 | 4,200 | 0.2231% |
| 1950 | #86 | 4,082 | 0.2280% |
| 1949 | #78 | 4,282 | 0.2414% |
| 1948 | #80 | 4,215 | 0.2402% |
| 1947 | #84 | 4,207 | 0.2299% |
| 1946 | #80 | 4,006 | 0.2467% |
| 1945 | #75 | 3,449 | 0.2563% |
| 1944 | #71 | 3,651 | 0.2679% |
| 1943 | #63 | 4,068 | 0.2850% |
| 1942 | #58 | 4,297 | 0.3111% |
| 1941 | #60 | 3,738 | 0.3043% |
| 1940 | #61 | 3,607 | 0.3112% |
| 1939 | #53 | 3,721 | 0.3362% |
| 1938 | #51 | 3,951 | 0.3562% |
| 1937 | #55 | 3,730 | 0.3497% |
| 1936 | #50 | 3,876 | 0.3737% |
| 1935 | #53 | 3,894 | 0.3739% |
| 1934 | #49 | 4,006 | 0.3880% |
| 1933 | #45 | 4,093 | 0.4128% |
| 1932 | #43 | 4,388 | 0.4202% |
| 1931 | #42 | 4,735 | 0.4554% |
| 1930 | #42 | 4,990 | 0.4547% |
| 1929 | #39 | 5,270 | 0.4900% |
| 1928 | #40 | 5,516 | 0.4980% |
| 1927 | #36 | 5,644 | 0.5008% |
| 1926 | #35 | 5,789 | 0.5213% |
| 1925 | #35 | 5,978 | 0.5357% |
| 1924 | #34 | 6,131 | 0.5413% |
| 1923 | #34 | 6,087 | 0.5553% |
| 1922 | #34 | 6,147 | 0.5649% |
| 1921 | #35 | 6,293 | 0.5713% |
| 1920 | #34 | 6,241 | 0.5864% |
| 1919 | #34 | 5,726 | 0.5842% |
| 1918 | #30 | 6,347 | 0.6263% |
| 1917 | #30 | 5,801 | 0.6268% |
| 1916 | #31 | 5,652 | 0.6350% |
| 1915 | #29 | 5,594 | 0.6592% |
| 1914 | #31 | 3,901 | 0.5958% |
| 1913 | #30 | 3,205 | 0.6253% |
| 1912 | #35 | 2,516 | 0.5852% |
| 1911 | #33 | 1,311 | 0.5802% |
| 1910 | #36 | 1,000 | 0.5149% |
| 1909 | #33 | 886 | 0.5403% |
| 1908 | #34 | 853 | 0.5527% |
| 1907 | #37 | 717 | 0.4883% |
| 1906 | #35 | 737 | 0.5535% |
| 1905 | #36 | 685 | 0.5177% |
| 1904 | #36 | 686 | 0.5354% |
| 1903 | #35 | 665 | 0.5577% |
| 1902 | #38 | 597 | 0.4867% |
| 1901 | #36 | 543 | 0.5100% |
| 1900 | #41 | 652 | 0.4333% |
| 1899 | #38 | 501 | 0.4717% |
| 1898 | #43 | 541 | 0.4410% |
| 1897 | #43 | 496 | 0.4399% |
| 1896 | #39 | 551 | 0.4608% |
| 1895 | #45 | 480 | 0.4089% |
| 1894 | #50 | 423 | 0.3654% |
| 1893 | #48 | 418 | 0.3722% |
| 1892 | #50 | 429 | 0.3515% |
| 1891 | #54 | 333 | 0.3291% |
| 1890 | #55 | 363 | 0.3270% |
| 1889 | #55 | 346 | 0.3129% |
| 1888 | #57 | 353 | 0.2921% |
| 1887 | #54 | 327 | 0.3225% |
| 1886 | #55 | 344 | 0.3105% |
| 1885 | #56 | 319 | 0.2959% |
| 1884 | #57 | 340 | 0.2971% |
| 1883 | #60 | 285 | 0.2724% |
| 1882 | #56 | 327 | 0.2876% |
| 1881 | #63 | 259 | 0.2571% |
| 1880 | #50 | 344 | 0.3113% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.