Fun Facts About the Name Rita
- An established favorite: Rita held a place in the U.S. top 100 for 47 consecutive years, from 1914 through 1960.
- More than 285 thousand babies named Rita: U.S. records list 285,226 babies given the name Rita from 1880 through 2025. Even 778 boys received the name Rita - about 1 boy for every 366 girls.
What Does the Name Rita Mean?
Rita is most widely used as a short form of Margaret-family names: Italian Margherita, Spanish and Portuguese Margarita, and their relatives. Those names descend from Latin margarita, "pearl," which was borrowed from Greek margaritēs. The Greek word is generally thought to come from an Iranian source (compare Persian murvārīd, "pearl"), so the deepest origin of the "pearl" element is not fully settled. Because Rita is a shortened form, its literal sense is simply "pearl," the meaning inherited from Margaret.
In South Asia, Rita is a separate name, usually connected with Sanskrit ṛta (ऋत), "cosmic order, truth, divine law," whose feminine form is ṛtā. On that derivation the name means "truth," a sense unrelated to "pearl." The European and South Asian origins are independent, so the name carries two distinct etymologies rather than one.
Rita Name History & Origins
As a European name, Rita began as a familiar short form of Margherita in Italy and of Margarita in Spain and Portugal. Short forms of this kind were common in the Middle Ages and later, and Rita was used alongside the longer name before becoming a given name in its own right. In Hungary, Rita is likewise a short form of Margit, the Hungarian form of Margaret.
The name's strongest Catholic association is St. Rita of Cascia (about 1381 - 1457), an Augustinian nun from Umbria in central Italy. She was canonized in 1900, and devotion to her, particularly in Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Latin America, helped keep the name in use. Her feast day is May 22.
In the 20th century Rita was a familiar given name in English-speaking countries; well-known bearers include the actress Rita Hayworth (born Margarita Carmen Cansino, showing the Spanish form behind the short name), the actress Rita Moreno, the poet Rita Dove, and the singer Rita Ora. In India the name follows the separate Sanskrit tradition described above and is used in languages such as Hindi and Bengali.
How Popular is the Name Rita?
Rita remained among the top 100 girl names in the U.S. from 1914 to 1960. Its highest annual birth count was in 1949, and people born that year turn 77 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,287 | 174 | 0.0108% |
| 2024 | #1,404 | 159 | 0.0099% |
| 2023 | #1,376 | 164 | 0.0102% |
| 2022 | #1,323 | 178 | 0.0109% |
| 2021 | #1,437 | 150 | 0.0091% |
| 2020 | #1,234 | 185 | 0.0115% |
| 2019 | #1,347 | 169 | 0.0101% |
| 2018 | #1,254 | 185 | 0.0109% |
| 2017 | #1,186 | 207 | 0.0120% |
| 2016 | #1,189 | 210 | 0.0119% |
| 2015 | #1,283 | 190 | 0.0106% |
| 2014 | #1,366 | 171 | 0.0096% |
| 2013 | #1,291 | 182 | 0.0104% |
| 2012 | #1,382 | 169 | 0.0096% |
| 2011 | #1,368 | 169 | 0.0096% |
| 2010 | #1,341 | 176 | 0.0099% |
| 2009 | #1,419 | 166 | 0.0090% |
| 2008 | #1,327 | 186 | 0.0098% |
| 2007 | #1,202 | 210 | 0.0109% |
| 2006 | #1,180 | 207 | 0.0109% |
| 2005 | #1,083 | 220 | 0.0119% |
| 2004 | #1,072 | 216 | 0.0118% |
| 2003 | #1,111 | 199 | 0.0109% |
| 2002 | #918 | 244 | 0.0136% |
| 2001 | #849 | 270 | 0.0150% |
| 2000 | #881 | 251 | 0.0138% |
| 1999 | #927 | 228 | 0.0129% |
| 1998 | #864 | 246 | 0.0139% |
| 1997 | #854 | 240 | 0.0138% |
| 1996 | #704 | 303 | 0.0173% |
| 1995 | #708 | 296 | 0.0168% |
| 1994 | #671 | 318 | 0.0178% |
| 1993 | #653 | 341 | 0.0188% |
| 1992 | #589 | 390 | 0.0212% |
| 1991 | #553 | 423 | 0.0226% |
| 1990 | #545 | 434 | 0.0229% |
| 1989 | #551 | 412 | 0.0223% |
| 1988 | #466 | 485 | 0.0272% |
| 1987 | #432 | 518 | 0.0298% |
| 1986 | #408 | 544 | 0.0317% |
| 1985 | #386 | 588 | 0.0342% |
| 1984 | #376 | 608 | 0.0361% |
| 1983 | #376 | 592 | 0.0354% |
| 1982 | #338 | 709 | 0.0419% |
| 1981 | #284 | 855 | 0.0513% |
| 1980 | #297 | 840 | 0.0506% |
| 1979 | #277 | 881 | 0.0549% |
| 1978 | #263 | 892 | 0.0582% |
| 1977 | #295 | 802 | 0.0523% |
| 1976 | #271 | 859 | 0.0586% |
| 1975 | #273 | 883 | 0.0606% |
| 1974 | #256 | 993 | 0.0677% |
| 1973 | #248 | 1,031 | 0.0707% |
| 1972 | #230 | 1,199 | 0.0788% |
| 1971 | #215 | 1,419 | 0.0853% |
| 1970 | #203 | 1,589 | 0.0909% |
| 1969 | #184 | 1,736 | 0.1029% |
| 1968 | #159 | 2,073 | 0.1264% |
| 1967 | #146 | 2,380 | 0.1442% |
| 1966 | #135 | 2,688 | 0.1588% |
| 1965 | #126 | 3,065 | 0.1736% |
| 1964 | #122 | 3,470 | 0.1831% |
| 1963 | #115 | 3,807 | 0.1975% |
| 1962 | #110 | 4,101 | 0.2085% |
| 1961 | #105 | 4,534 | 0.2246% |
| 1960 | #96 | 5,027 | 0.2486% |
| 1959 | #98 | 4,951 | 0.2447% |
| 1958 | #88 | 5,341 | 0.2655% |
| 1957 | #78 | 6,018 | 0.2943% |
| 1956 | #79 | 6,055 | 0.3016% |
| 1955 | #72 | 6,094 | 0.3117% |
| 1954 | #67 | 6,536 | 0.3366% |
| 1953 | #64 | 6,284 | 0.3340% |
| 1952 | #66 | 6,148 | 0.3315% |
| 1951 | #61 | 6,415 | 0.3562% |
| 1950 | #56 | 6,423 | 0.3749% |
| 1949 | #54 | 6,654 | 0.3889% |
| 1948 | #59 | 5,835 | 0.3437% |
| 1947 | #60 | 5,982 | 0.3374% |
| 1946 | #56 | 5,533 | 0.3521% |
| 1945 | #59 | 4,282 | 0.3276% |
| 1944 | #55 | 4,530 | 0.3413% |
| 1943 | #52 | 5,011 | 0.3591% |
| 1942 | #55 | 4,706 | 0.3484% |
| 1941 | #63 | 3,879 | 0.3211% |
| 1940 | #70 | 3,442 | 0.3010% |
| 1939 | #78 | 3,188 | 0.2907% |
| 1938 | #74 | 3,357 | 0.3042% |
| 1937 | #69 | 3,421 | 0.3215% |
| 1936 | #69 | 3,333 | 0.3204% |
| 1935 | #63 | 3,579 | 0.3413% |
| 1934 | #63 | 3,683 | 0.3527% |
| 1933 | #53 | 3,841 | 0.3811% |
| 1932 | #53 | 4,255 | 0.3987% |
| 1931 | #48 | 4,613 | 0.4333% |
| 1930 | #42 | 5,470 | 0.4858% |
| 1929 | #52 | 4,767 | 0.4269% |
| 1928 | #57 | 4,810 | 0.4171% |
| 1927 | #54 | 5,084 | 0.4264% |
| 1926 | #50 | 5,015 | 0.4231% |
| 1925 | #48 | 5,323 | 0.4372% |
| 1924 | #49 | 5,381 | 0.4309% |
| 1923 | #50 | 5,095 | 0.4223% |
| 1922 | #52 | 4,976 | 0.4143% |
| 1921 | #48 | 5,157 | 0.4182% |
| 1920 | #52 | 4,979 | 0.4155% |
| 1919 | #54 | 4,515 | 0.3995% |
| 1918 | #58 | 4,447 | 0.3841% |
| 1917 | #63 | 3,870 | 0.3579% |
| 1916 | #67 | 3,477 | 0.3329% |
| 1915 | #71 | 3,063 | 0.3113% |
| 1914 | #87 | 2,010 | 0.2639% |
| 1913 | #116 | 1,096 | 0.1755% |
| 1912 | #165 | 636 | 0.1140% |
| 1911 | #179 | 403 | 0.0963% |
| 1910 | #198 | 333 | 0.0840% |
| 1909 | #197 | 295 | 0.0850% |
| 1908 | #212 | 255 | 0.0763% |
| 1907 | #196 | 266 | 0.0835% |
| 1906 | #219 | 203 | 0.0687% |
| 1905 | #229 | 188 | 0.0645% |
| 1904 | #242 | 166 | 0.0603% |
| 1903 | #228 | 174 | 0.0664% |
| 1902 | #257 | 148 | 0.0560% |
| 1901 | #249 | 135 | 0.0564% |
| 1900 | #256 | 162 | 0.0540% |
| 1899 | #228 | 147 | 0.0631% |
| 1898 | #244 | 146 | 0.0564% |
| 1897 | #264 | 117 | 0.0500% |
| 1896 | #275 | 109 | 0.0458% |
| 1895 | #275 | 105 | 0.0449% |
| 1894 | #273 | 104 | 0.0467% |
| 1893 | #275 | 95 | 0.0446% |
| 1892 | #291 | 87 | 0.0410% |
| 1891 | #314 | 65 | 0.0350% |
| 1890 | #349 | 54 | 0.0284% |
| 1889 | #276 | 75 | 0.0420% |
| 1888 | #335 | 52 | 0.0291% |
| 1887 | #342 | 40 | 0.0274% |
| 1886 | #414 | 28 | 0.0194% |
| 1885 | #372 | 31 | 0.0233% |
| 1884 | #414 | 24 | 0.0186% |
| 1883 | #514 | 15 | 0.0134% |
| 1882 | #402 | 21 | 0.0195% |
| 1881 | #382 | 20 | 0.0218% |
| 1880 | #385 | 19 | 0.0209% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | #5,458 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1980 | #4,423 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1979 | #6,859 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1978 | #4,100 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1972 | #4,345 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1971 | #3,105 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1970 | #3,030 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1968 | #2,696 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1967 | #2,940 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1966 | #2,312 | 13 | 0.0007% |
| 1965 | #3,488 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1964 | #2,630 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1963 | #2,393 | 13 | 0.0006% |
| 1962 | #2,022 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1961 | #2,864 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1960 | #2,189 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1959 | #3,537 | 7 | 0.0003% |
| 1958 | #1,882 | 19 | 0.0009% |
| 1957 | #2,074 | 16 | 0.0007% |
| 1956 | #3,156 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 1955 | #1,960 | 17 | 0.0008% |
| 1954 | #2,098 | 15 | 0.0007% |
| 1953 | #3,725 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1952 | #2,351 | 12 | 0.0006% |
| 1951 | #2,471 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1950 | #2,097 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1949 | #1,927 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1948 | #2,580 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1947 | #1,901 | 17 | 0.0009% |
| 1946 | #2,123 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1945 | #2,546 | 9 | 0.0007% |
| 1944 | #2,437 | 10 | 0.0007% |
| 1943 | #1,976 | 15 | 0.0011% |
| 1942 | #1,929 | 15 | 0.0011% |
| 1941 | #1,577 | 20 | 0.0016% |
| 1940 | #1,970 | 14 | 0.0012% |
| 1939 | #1,779 | 16 | 0.0014% |
| 1938 | #2,822 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1937 | #2,175 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1936 | #1,498 | 21 | 0.0020% |
| 1935 | #2,221 | 12 | 0.0012% |
| 1934 | #1,913 | 15 | 0.0015% |
| 1933 | #1,694 | 18 | 0.0018% |
| 1932 | #1,318 | 28 | 0.0027% |
| 1931 | #1,276 | 30 | 0.0029% |
| 1930 | #1,641 | 21 | 0.0019% |
| 1929 | #1,912 | 17 | 0.0016% |
| 1928 | #1,637 | 22 | 0.0020% |
| 1927 | #1,857 | 19 | 0.0017% |
| 1926 | #2,406 | 13 | 0.0012% |
| 1925 | #2,069 | 16 | 0.0014% |
| 1924 | #2,598 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1923 | #4,158 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1922 | #3,477 | 8 | 0.0007% |
| 1921 | #2,767 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1920 | #2,430 | 13 | 0.0012% |
| 1918 | #2,668 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1916 | #3,449 | 7 | 0.0008% |
| 1915 | #3,017 | 8 | 0.0009% |
| 1913 | #3,182 | 5 | 0.0010% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.