Fun Facts About the Name Hugh
- A favorite of earlier generations: Hugh appeared in the U.S. top 100 in 2 separate runs, totaling 24 years. Its last run lasted 1 consecutive years, from 1916 through 1916.
- More than 84 thousand babies named Hugh: U.S. records list 84,180 babies given the name Hugh from 1880 through 2025. Even 354 girls received the name Hugh - about 1 girl for every 237 boys.
What Does the Name Hugh Mean?
Hugh is an English masculine name meaning 'heart, mind, spirit.' It comes from the Germanic element hug, from reconstructed Proto-Germanic hugiz, which referred to the mind, thought, or spirit. The name entered English through Old French Hugues, the French form of Latin Hugo. Hugo began as a short form of compound Germanic names beginning with Hug-, such as Hugbert; the first element carried the root's sense, while the second element varied. The gloss 'heart, mind, spirit' is traditional; the older core sense centered on 'mind' and 'thought.'
Hugh Name History & Origins
The Germanic element hug- appears in Old English hyge, Old Norse hugr, and Old High German hugu, all connected with the mind, thought, or courage. The personal name Hugo was used by the Franks and other Germanic peoples and was written as Hugo in medieval Latin documents. In France it developed into Hugues. After the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, Norman French Hugues was brought to England and became the English Hugh. The name was common in medieval Europe and was borne by several saints, including St. Hugh of Cluny (1024 - 1109), St. Hugh of Grenoble (1053 - 1132), and St. Hugh of Lincoln (c. 1135 - 1200). It was also the name of Hugh Capet (c. 939 - 996), founder of the French Capetian dynasty. In Wales, Huw developed as a Welsh form of the same name; other language forms include Italian Ugo and Spanish and German Hugo.
How Popular is the Name Hugh?
Hugh recorded its highest annual U.S. birth count in 1916. Hugh ranked among the top 100 U.S. names from 1880 through 1902, then returned in 1916 and remained through 1916.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | #11,268 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1968 | #4,901 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1959 | #6,615 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1958 | #6,449 | 5 | 0.0002% |
| 1953 | #6,015 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1950 | #5,607 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1944 | #3,227 | 9 | 0.0007% |
| 1942 | #4,318 | 6 | 0.0004% |
| 1941 | #4,154 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1939 | #3,969 | 6 | 0.0005% |
| 1938 | #3,026 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1937 | #4,525 | 5 | 0.0005% |
| 1936 | #3,897 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| 1935 | #2,486 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1934 | #3,017 | 9 | 0.0009% |
| 1932 | #2,420 | 13 | 0.0012% |
| 1931 | #3,337 | 8 | 0.0008% |
| 1930 | #2,759 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1929 | #2,816 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1928 | #2,862 | 11 | 0.0010% |
| 1927 | #2,205 | 17 | 0.0014% |
| 1926 | #2,295 | 16 | 0.0013% |
| 1925 | #2,683 | 13 | 0.0011% |
| 1924 | #4,180 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1923 | #2,122 | 18 | 0.0015% |
| 1922 | #2,337 | 16 | 0.0013% |
| 1921 | #2,429 | 15 | 0.0012% |
| 1920 | #2,115 | 18 | 0.0015% |
| 1919 | #3,315 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1918 | #2,242 | 16 | 0.0014% |
| 1917 | #2,629 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1916 | #3,703 | 7 | 0.0007% |
| 1915 | #2,992 | 9 | 0.0009% |
| 1914 | #3,876 | 5 | 0.0007% |
| 1913 | #2,995 | 6 | 0.0010% |
| 1912 | #2,487 | 7 | 0.0013% |
| 1911 | #2,060 | 7 | 0.0017% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #732 | 360 | 0.0211% |
| 2024 | #763 | 332 | 0.0194% |
| 2023 | #784 | 323 | 0.0189% |
| 2022 | #804 | 312 | 0.0179% |
| 2021 | #741 | 343 | 0.0196% |
| 2020 | #748 | 324 | 0.0188% |
| 2019 | #799 | 287 | 0.0160% |
| 2018 | #805 | 281 | 0.0155% |
| 2017 | #838 | 264 | 0.0143% |
| 2016 | #850 | 264 | 0.0139% |
| 2015 | #848 | 265 | 0.0138% |
| 2014 | #865 | 255 | 0.0133% |
| 2013 | #915 | 227 | 0.0120% |
| 2012 | #930 | 220 | 0.0116% |
| 2011 | #945 | 210 | 0.0111% |
| 2010 | #961 | 206 | 0.0107% |
| 2009 | #995 | 199 | 0.0100% |
| 2008 | #1,002 | 195 | 0.0096% |
| 2007 | #982 | 200 | 0.0096% |
| 2006 | #1,001 | 184 | 0.0090% |
| 2005 | #961 | 182 | 0.0091% |
| 2004 | #923 | 184 | 0.0093% |
| 2003 | #880 | 194 | 0.0098% |
| 2002 | #867 | 191 | 0.0098% |
| 2001 | #858 | 187 | 0.0096% |
| 2000 | #909 | 171 | 0.0087% |
| 1999 | #854 | 178 | 0.0093% |
| 1998 | #774 | 203 | 0.0106% |
| 1997 | #744 | 202 | 0.0107% |
| 1996 | #766 | 193 | 0.0102% |
| 1995 | #807 | 175 | 0.0092% |
| 1994 | #817 | 168 | 0.0087% |
| 1993 | #903 | 142 | 0.0072% |
| 1992 | #832 | 161 | 0.0081% |
| 1991 | #775 | 176 | 0.0087% |
| 1990 | #736 | 193 | 0.0094% |
| 1989 | #687 | 210 | 0.0105% |
| 1988 | #687 | 186 | 0.0097% |
| 1987 | #652 | 199 | 0.0107% |
| 1986 | #646 | 191 | 0.0104% |
| 1985 | #587 | 224 | 0.0121% |
| 1984 | #604 | 200 | 0.0111% |
| 1983 | #608 | 198 | 0.0110% |
| 1982 | #565 | 230 | 0.0127% |
| 1981 | #590 | 210 | 0.0117% |
| 1980 | #574 | 227 | 0.0127% |
| 1979 | #558 | 237 | 0.0138% |
| 1978 | #533 | 241 | 0.0147% |
| 1977 | #504 | 262 | 0.0159% |
| 1976 | #516 | 242 | 0.0154% |
| 1975 | #478 | 280 | 0.0179% |
| 1974 | #468 | 294 | 0.0187% |
| 1973 | #454 | 299 | 0.0192% |
| 1972 | #393 | 402 | 0.0248% |
| 1971 | #384 | 435 | 0.0246% |
| 1970 | #368 | 486 | 0.0262% |
| 1969 | #366 | 460 | 0.0257% |
| 1968 | #351 | 494 | 0.0284% |
| 1967 | #337 | 502 | 0.0288% |
| 1966 | #311 | 566 | 0.0317% |
| 1965 | #293 | 656 | 0.0353% |
| 1964 | #292 | 722 | 0.0362% |
| 1963 | #272 | 794 | 0.0391% |
| 1962 | #270 | 814 | 0.0393% |
| 1961 | #269 | 872 | 0.0411% |
| 1960 | #265 | 904 | 0.0424% |
| 1959 | #255 | 983 | 0.0461% |
| 1958 | #243 | 1,031 | 0.0486% |
| 1957 | #245 | 967 | 0.0448% |
| 1956 | #236 | 958 | 0.0453% |
| 1955 | #236 | 896 | 0.0435% |
| 1954 | #230 | 943 | 0.0463% |
| 1953 | #219 | 959 | 0.0486% |
| 1952 | #210 | 977 | 0.0503% |
| 1951 | #203 | 1,024 | 0.0544% |
| 1950 | #206 | 959 | 0.0536% |
| 1949 | #198 | 1,042 | 0.0587% |
| 1948 | #191 | 1,039 | 0.0592% |
| 1947 | #176 | 1,201 | 0.0656% |
| 1946 | #174 | 1,088 | 0.0670% |
| 1945 | #171 | 961 | 0.0714% |
| 1944 | #165 | 1,064 | 0.0781% |
| 1943 | #160 | 1,206 | 0.0845% |
| 1942 | #154 | 1,254 | 0.0908% |
| 1941 | #160 | 1,083 | 0.0882% |
| 1940 | #157 | 1,060 | 0.0914% |
| 1939 | #160 | 999 | 0.0903% |
| 1938 | #146 | 1,121 | 0.1011% |
| 1937 | #143 | 1,070 | 0.1003% |
| 1936 | #142 | 1,074 | 0.1035% |
| 1935 | #139 | 1,142 | 0.1097% |
| 1934 | #135 | 1,187 | 0.1150% |
| 1933 | #141 | 1,118 | 0.1128% |
| 1932 | #128 | 1,320 | 0.1264% |
| 1931 | #131 | 1,326 | 0.1275% |
| 1930 | #131 | 1,342 | 0.1223% |
| 1929 | #139 | 1,229 | 0.1143% |
| 1928 | #129 | 1,374 | 0.1240% |
| 1927 | #131 | 1,357 | 0.1204% |
| 1926 | #128 | 1,393 | 0.1254% |
| 1925 | #127 | 1,386 | 0.1242% |
| 1924 | #116 | 1,541 | 0.1360% |
| 1923 | #123 | 1,412 | 0.1288% |
| 1922 | #120 | 1,441 | 0.1324% |
| 1921 | #120 | 1,485 | 0.1348% |
| 1920 | #115 | 1,489 | 0.1399% |
| 1919 | #114 | 1,417 | 0.1446% |
| 1918 | #112 | 1,489 | 0.1469% |
| 1917 | #110 | 1,403 | 0.1516% |
| 1916 | #96 | 1,619 | 0.1819% |
| 1915 | #111 | 1,318 | 0.1553% |
| 1914 | #116 | 967 | 0.1477% |
| 1913 | #115 | 754 | 0.1471% |
| 1912 | #116 | 648 | 0.1507% |
| 1911 | #121 | 307 | 0.1359% |
| 1910 | #112 | 279 | 0.1437% |
| 1909 | #104 | 260 | 0.1585% |
| 1908 | #121 | 215 | 0.1393% |
| 1907 | #113 | 212 | 0.1444% |
| 1906 | #110 | 195 | 0.1464% |
| 1905 | #107 | 200 | 0.1512% |
| 1904 | #105 | 202 | 0.1577% |
| 1903 | #101 | 193 | 0.1619% |
| 1902 | #92 | 217 | 0.1769% |
| 1901 | #91 | 192 | 0.1803% |
| 1900 | #88 | 290 | 0.1927% |
| 1899 | #88 | 209 | 0.1968% |
| 1898 | #84 | 250 | 0.2038% |
| 1897 | #86 | 213 | 0.1889% |
| 1896 | #75 | 263 | 0.2200% |
| 1895 | #80 | 243 | 0.2070% |
| 1894 | #75 | 269 | 0.2324% |
| 1893 | #78 | 241 | 0.2146% |
| 1892 | #77 | 265 | 0.2172% |
| 1891 | #73 | 233 | 0.2303% |
| 1890 | #80 | 219 | 0.1973% |
| 1889 | #78 | 225 | 0.2035% |
| 1888 | #79 | 253 | 0.2093% |
| 1887 | #69 | 250 | 0.2465% |
| 1886 | #77 | 227 | 0.2049% |
| 1885 | #73 | 257 | 0.2384% |
| 1884 | #73 | 246 | 0.2150% |
| 1883 | #74 | 215 | 0.2055% |
| 1882 | #73 | 239 | 0.2102% |
| 1881 | #70 | 219 | 0.2174% |
| 1880 | #71 | 224 | 0.2027% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.