Fun Facts About the Name Ernest
- Decades of popularity: Ernest stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 77 consecutive years, from 1880 through 1956.
- More than 304 thousand babies named Ernest: U.S. records list 304,350 babies given the name Ernest from 1880 through 2025. Even 1,855 girls received the name Ernest - about 1 girl for every 163 boys.
What Does the Name Ernest Mean?
Ernest means "earnest" or "serious" and comes from Germanic speech, specifically Old High German ernust, from an older Proto-Germanic form usually reconstructed as *ernustuz. The name is simply that common noun - the word for earnestness or gravity - put to use as a personal name, a pattern common among Germanic names built from everyday vocabulary.
The Old English cousin of the same word, eornost, survives in the modern English word "earnest." So the ordinary noun and the name share an ancestor; the name did not produce the noun, and the noun did not produce the name. The customary interpretation of the name as "sincere" or "serious-minded" is a restatement of that same core sense rather than a separate etymology.
Some reference works trace *ernustuz further back to an older root connected with struggle or decisive action, which would give the name an underlying flavor of "resolute" or "determined." That deeper link is not settled, and the meaning that the name actually carried in medieval Europe is the straightforward one: earnestness, seriousness.
Ernest Name History & Origins
The name spread with the Germanic peoples and appears in medieval records in a range of spellings. The Normans carried it to England after the Norman Conquest of 1066, where it is found in forms such as Ernis and Ernais. It remained uncommon in England throughout the Middle Ages and was never among the leading medieval English names.
On the continent the form Ernst was used by noble houses. Ernst the Iron, Duke of Austria in the 15th century, is a well-documented medieval bearer, and the name recurred in the Habsburg and Wettin families. In the 19th century it became familiar in Britain through German dynastic connections: George III's son Ernest Augustus, Duke of Cumberland, became King of Hanover, and Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, was the father of Prince Albert.
Religious use also appears. Ernest of Pardubice, the first Archbishop of Prague in the 14th century, is the best-known churchman of the name.
Oscar Wilde's play The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) turns the name into a joke, since a character invents an imaginary brother named Ernest and the title plays on "earnest" as a character trait. This is a famous literary use of an already established name, not the name's origin. Among later English-speaking bearers, the writer Ernest Hemingway, the Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton, and the physicist Ernest Rutherford are widely known.
Other European languages took the same Germanic name into their own forms: Ernst in German and Dutch, Ernest in French, and Ernesto in Italian and Spanish. The feminine forms Ernestine and Ernesta are built from the same root.
How Popular is the Name Ernest?
Ernest remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1880 to 1956. Its highest annual birth count was in 1921, and people born that year turn 105 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | #8,159 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1989 | #7,614 | 10 | 0.0005% |
| 1988 | #7,904 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1987 | #9,075 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1986 | #6,755 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1985 | #7,130 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1984 | #6,022 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 1983 | #5,931 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 1982 | #5,012 | 14 | 0.0008% |
| 1981 | #6,961 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1980 | #4,381 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 1979 | #4,092 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1978 | #7,870 | 7 | 0.0005% |
| 1977 | #4,282 | 16 | 0.0010% |
| 1976 | #4,013 | 16 | 0.0011% |
| 1975 | #4,419 | 14 | 0.0010% |
| 1974 | #4,089 | 15 | 0.0010% |
| 1973 | #4,975 | 11 | 0.0008% |
| 1972 | #3,763 | 16 | 0.0011% |
| 1971 | #3,196 | 21 | 0.0013% |
| 1970 | #3,340 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1969 | #2,939 | 21 | 0.0012% |
| 1968 | #4,066 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1967 | #2,723 | 21 | 0.0013% |
| 1966 | #4,994 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1965 | #2,624 | 22 | 0.0012% |
| 1964 | #2,556 | 24 | 0.0013% |
| 1963 | #2,806 | 20 | 0.0010% |
| 1962 | #2,482 | 24 | 0.0012% |
| 1961 | #2,313 | 27 | 0.0013% |
| 1960 | #2,459 | 24 | 0.0012% |
| 1959 | #2,357 | 24 | 0.0012% |
| 1958 | #2,406 | 23 | 0.0011% |
| 1957 | #2,751 | 18 | 0.0009% |
| 1956 | #2,116 | 27 | 0.0013% |
| 1955 | #3,132 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1954 | #2,726 | 17 | 0.0009% |
| 1953 | #2,974 | 14 | 0.0007% |
| 1952 | #2,149 | 23 | 0.0012% |
| 1951 | #2,620 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1950 | #2,278 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1949 | #1,717 | 31 | 0.0018% |
| 1948 | #2,207 | 20 | 0.0012% |
| 1947 | #2,674 | 15 | 0.0008% |
| 1946 | #2,775 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1945 | #1,808 | 22 | 0.0017% |
| 1944 | #1,498 | 30 | 0.0023% |
| 1943 | #1,715 | 25 | 0.0018% |
| 1942 | #1,678 | 25 | 0.0019% |
| 1941 | #1,762 | 21 | 0.0017% |
| 1940 | #1,759 | 21 | 0.0018% |
| 1939 | #1,904 | 18 | 0.0016% |
| 1938 | #1,252 | 34 | 0.0031% |
| 1937 | #2,116 | 15 | 0.0014% |
| 1936 | #1,329 | 30 | 0.0029% |
| 1935 | #1,686 | 21 | 0.0020% |
| 1934 | #1,423 | 27 | 0.0026% |
| 1933 | #1,251 | 33 | 0.0033% |
| 1932 | #1,223 | 35 | 0.0033% |
| 1931 | #1,266 | 33 | 0.0031% |
| 1930 | #1,278 | 35 | 0.0031% |
| 1929 | #1,200 | 39 | 0.0035% |
| 1928 | #1,120 | 46 | 0.0040% |
| 1927 | #1,072 | 51 | 0.0043% |
| 1926 | #1,289 | 37 | 0.0031% |
| 1925 | #1,153 | 45 | 0.0037% |
| 1924 | #1,286 | 39 | 0.0031% |
| 1923 | #1,566 | 28 | 0.0023% |
| 1922 | #1,380 | 34 | 0.0028% |
| 1921 | #1,687 | 26 | 0.0021% |
| 1920 | #1,323 | 35 | 0.0029% |
| 1919 | #1,616 | 25 | 0.0022% |
| 1918 | #1,365 | 32 | 0.0028% |
| 1917 | #2,233 | 15 | 0.0014% |
| 1916 | #1,416 | 27 | 0.0026% |
| 1915 | #1,539 | 23 | 0.0023% |
| 1914 | #1,563 | 18 | 0.0024% |
| 1913 | #1,935 | 11 | 0.0018% |
| 1912 | #2,031 | 9 | 0.0016% |
| 1911 | #1,482 | 11 | 0.0026% |
| 1910 | #2,528 | 5 | 0.0013% |
| 1909 | #1,828 | 7 | 0.0020% |
| 1908 | #2,216 | 5 | 0.0015% |
| 1907 | #1,430 | 9 | 0.0028% |
| 1905 | #1,460 | 8 | 0.0027% |
| 1904 | #1,297 | 9 | 0.0033% |
| 1902 | #1,661 | 6 | 0.0023% |
| 1901 | #1,163 | 9 | 0.0038% |
| 1900 | #2,023 | 5 | 0.0017% |
| 1899 | #1,681 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| 1898 | #1,414 | 7 | 0.0027% |
| 1895 | #1,009 | 11 | 0.0047% |
| 1893 | #1,497 | 5 | 0.0023% |
| 1892 | #807 | 14 | 0.0066% |
| 1889 | #921 | 9 | 0.0050% |
| 1888 | #1,183 | 6 | 0.0034% |
| 1887 | #977 | 7 | 0.0048% |
| 1886 | #1,162 | 5 | 0.0035% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,040 | 213 | 0.0125% |
| 2024 | #1,083 | 200 | 0.0117% |
| 2023 | #1,030 | 212 | 0.0124% |
| 2022 | #1,131 | 186 | 0.0107% |
| 2021 | #1,107 | 187 | 0.0107% |
| 2020 | #1,009 | 208 | 0.0121% |
| 2019 | #1,057 | 193 | 0.0108% |
| 2018 | #965 | 215 | 0.0118% |
| 2017 | #951 | 219 | 0.0118% |
| 2016 | #977 | 210 | 0.0111% |
| 2015 | #956 | 216 | 0.0113% |
| 2014 | #878 | 247 | 0.0129% |
| 2013 | #934 | 217 | 0.0115% |
| 2012 | #923 | 223 | 0.0118% |
| 2011 | #847 | 253 | 0.0133% |
| 2010 | #926 | 218 | 0.0114% |
| 2009 | #850 | 251 | 0.0127% |
| 2008 | #793 | 277 | 0.0136% |
| 2007 | #761 | 289 | 0.0139% |
| 2006 | #725 | 298 | 0.0145% |
| 2005 | #649 | 336 | 0.0168% |
| 2004 | #595 | 368 | 0.0185% |
| 2003 | #595 | 363 | 0.0184% |
| 2002 | #591 | 353 | 0.0182% |
| 2001 | #576 | 357 | 0.0184% |
| 2000 | #514 | 440 | 0.0224% |
| 1999 | #536 | 387 | 0.0202% |
| 1998 | #485 | 450 | 0.0235% |
| 1997 | #461 | 480 | 0.0255% |
| 1996 | #437 | 517 | 0.0273% |
| 1995 | #460 | 491 | 0.0258% |
| 1994 | #392 | 591 | 0.0306% |
| 1993 | #367 | 644 | 0.0328% |
| 1992 | #337 | 721 | 0.0361% |
| 1991 | #299 | 853 | 0.0422% |
| 1990 | #283 | 920 | 0.0448% |
| 1989 | #265 | 955 | 0.0477% |
| 1988 | #239 | 1,002 | 0.0523% |
| 1987 | #245 | 947 | 0.0507% |
| 1986 | #233 | 1,007 | 0.0547% |
| 1985 | #220 | 1,072 | 0.0580% |
| 1984 | #203 | 1,148 | 0.0636% |
| 1983 | #199 | 1,191 | 0.0664% |
| 1982 | #200 | 1,240 | 0.0683% |
| 1981 | #193 | 1,305 | 0.0729% |
| 1980 | #180 | 1,369 | 0.0767% |
| 1979 | #171 | 1,399 | 0.0813% |
| 1978 | #171 | 1,381 | 0.0841% |
| 1977 | #161 | 1,485 | 0.0904% |
| 1976 | #160 | 1,483 | 0.0945% |
| 1975 | #161 | 1,514 | 0.0970% |
| 1974 | #150 | 1,642 | 0.1044% |
| 1973 | #149 | 1,680 | 0.1078% |
| 1972 | #147 | 1,767 | 0.1090% |
| 1971 | #143 | 2,101 | 0.1188% |
| 1970 | #143 | 2,304 | 0.1240% |
| 1969 | #130 | 2,357 | 0.1318% |
| 1968 | #130 | 2,246 | 0.1292% |
| 1967 | #128 | 2,351 | 0.1348% |
| 1966 | #122 | 2,505 | 0.1405% |
| 1965 | #124 | 2,577 | 0.1385% |
| 1964 | #124 | 2,815 | 0.1413% |
| 1963 | #122 | 2,906 | 0.1431% |
| 1962 | #127 | 2,850 | 0.1378% |
| 1961 | #123 | 3,096 | 0.1458% |
| 1960 | #120 | 3,189 | 0.1496% |
| 1959 | #118 | 3,340 | 0.1565% |
| 1958 | #113 | 3,517 | 0.1657% |
| 1957 | #101 | 3,786 | 0.1755% |
| 1956 | #94 | 3,953 | 0.1869% |
| 1955 | #90 | 3,973 | 0.1929% |
| 1954 | #87 | 4,202 | 0.2061% |
| 1953 | #87 | 4,096 | 0.2077% |
| 1952 | #87 | 4,122 | 0.2121% |
| 1951 | #83 | 4,381 | 0.2327% |
| 1950 | #81 | 4,309 | 0.2407% |
| 1949 | #76 | 4,346 | 0.2450% |
| 1948 | #76 | 4,513 | 0.2572% |
| 1947 | #75 | 4,786 | 0.2616% |
| 1946 | #71 | 4,395 | 0.2706% |
| 1945 | #60 | 4,005 | 0.2976% |
| 1944 | #59 | 4,042 | 0.2966% |
| 1943 | #61 | 4,172 | 0.2923% |
| 1942 | #61 | 4,079 | 0.2953% |
| 1941 | #61 | 3,726 | 0.3033% |
| 1940 | #58 | 3,698 | 0.3190% |
| 1939 | #55 | 3,688 | 0.3332% |
| 1938 | #55 | 3,708 | 0.3343% |
| 1937 | #53 | 3,759 | 0.3524% |
| 1936 | #55 | 3,715 | 0.3582% |
| 1935 | #55 | 3,701 | 0.3554% |
| 1934 | #51 | 3,850 | 0.3728% |
| 1933 | #50 | 3,674 | 0.3705% |
| 1932 | #47 | 4,166 | 0.3990% |
| 1931 | #47 | 4,298 | 0.4134% |
| 1930 | #43 | 4,787 | 0.4362% |
| 1929 | #43 | 4,753 | 0.4419% |
| 1928 | #43 | 4,941 | 0.4461% |
| 1927 | #41 | 5,208 | 0.4621% |
| 1926 | #37 | 5,436 | 0.4895% |
| 1925 | #37 | 5,494 | 0.4923% |
| 1924 | #37 | 5,683 | 0.5017% |
| 1923 | #38 | 5,372 | 0.4901% |
| 1922 | #37 | 5,503 | 0.5057% |
| 1921 | #38 | 5,697 | 0.5172% |
| 1920 | #37 | 5,566 | 0.5229% |
| 1919 | #36 | 5,296 | 0.5403% |
| 1918 | #37 | 5,527 | 0.5453% |
| 1917 | #37 | 5,055 | 0.5462% |
| 1916 | #36 | 4,823 | 0.5419% |
| 1915 | #35 | 4,787 | 0.5641% |
| 1914 | #38 | 3,632 | 0.5547% |
| 1913 | #34 | 2,940 | 0.5736% |
| 1912 | #32 | 2,569 | 0.5975% |
| 1911 | #32 | 1,338 | 0.5921% |
| 1910 | #31 | 1,167 | 0.6009% |
| 1909 | #34 | 885 | 0.5396% |
| 1908 | #31 | 1,000 | 0.6479% |
| 1907 | #30 | 978 | 0.6661% |
| 1906 | #28 | 943 | 0.7082% |
| 1905 | #31 | 845 | 0.6387% |
| 1904 | #32 | 749 | 0.5846% |
| 1903 | #30 | 764 | 0.6408% |
| 1902 | #29 | 790 | 0.6441% |
| 1901 | #28 | 691 | 0.6490% |
| 1900 | #30 | 1,012 | 0.6725% |
| 1899 | #27 | 744 | 0.7005% |
| 1898 | #28 | 839 | 0.6839% |
| 1897 | #27 | 785 | 0.6962% |
| 1896 | #29 | 764 | 0.6390% |
| 1895 | #24 | 834 | 0.7104% |
| 1894 | #24 | 821 | 0.7092% |
| 1893 | #23 | 796 | 0.7087% |
| 1892 | #26 | 805 | 0.6596% |
| 1891 | #22 | 715 | 0.7066% |
| 1890 | #22 | 774 | 0.6971% |
| 1889 | #23 | 736 | 0.6656% |
| 1888 | #27 | 766 | 0.6338% |
| 1887 | #23 | 653 | 0.6439% |
| 1886 | #25 | 668 | 0.6030% |
| 1885 | #21 | 718 | 0.6661% |
| 1884 | #25 | 690 | 0.6029% |
| 1883 | #23 | 641 | 0.6127% |
| 1882 | #27 | 642 | 0.5647% |
| 1881 | #25 | 571 | 0.5668% |
| 1880 | #26 | 615 | 0.5566% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.