Fun Facts About the Name Bobby
- Decades of popularity: Bobby stayed in the U.S. top 100 for 50 consecutive years, from 1927 through 1976.
- More than 324 thousand babies named Bobby: U.S. records list 324,718 babies given the name Bobby from 1880 through 2025. Even 9,675 girls received the name Bobby - about 1 girl for every 33 boys.
What Does the Name Bobby Mean?
Bobby is an English familiar form of the name Robert and shares its meaning: "bright fame." Robert comes from a Germanic name, recorded in Old French as Robert, formed from the elements hrōþi ("fame," "glory") and berht ("bright," "shining"). The literal sense is shining or famous renown. Bobby adds the affectionate English ending -y to the short form Bob, so it is a diminutive of Robert rather than a name with a separate origin of its own.
Bobby Name History & Origins
The Germanic ancestor of Robert, something like Hrōþiberht, passed into medieval France as the Old French Robert. It reached England with the Normans after 1066 and became one of the most common men's names of the Middle Ages, borne by rulers and saints. That wide use produced many short, familiar forms.
In Middle English, one common way to make a nickname was to change the first letter of a short form, often producing a rhyming pair. Thus Rob also appeared as Bob, much as William gave Bill and Richard gave Dick. The affectionate ending -y or -ie was then added to these short forms, giving Bobby, also spelled Bobbie. Over time Bobby came to be used as a given name in its own right, not only as a nickname for a Robert.
Separately, bobby became a British term for a police officer. It refers to Sir Robert Peel, whose Metropolitan Police force was set up in London in 1829 and whose officers were nicknamed after him. That sense belongs to the common noun, not to the personal name, though both trace back to Robert.
How Popular is the Name Bobby?
Bobby remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1927 to 1976. Its highest annual birth count was in 1937, and people born that year turn 89 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #8,448 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 2024 | #10,377 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 2022 | #9,798 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 2021 | #12,418 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2019 | #11,538 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 2018 | #12,704 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 2017 | #16,286 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2012 | #15,275 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2010 | #17,455 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2009 | #17,745 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 2008 | #15,715 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2006 | #15,439 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2004 | #11,778 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2003 | #11,478 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2002 | #13,859 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 2001 | #11,163 | 8 | 0.0004% |
| 2000 | #8,105 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1999 | #8,309 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1998 | #5,399 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1997 | #7,828 | 11 | 0.0006% |
| 1996 | #4,605 | 22 | 0.0013% |
| 1995 | #4,864 | 20 | 0.0011% |
| 1994 | #5,040 | 19 | 0.0011% |
| 1993 | #4,541 | 22 | 0.0012% |
| 1992 | #4,704 | 21 | 0.0011% |
| 1991 | #3,103 | 36 | 0.0019% |
| 1990 | #3,629 | 29 | 0.0015% |
| 1989 | #2,305 | 51 | 0.0028% |
| 1988 | #3,230 | 30 | 0.0017% |
| 1987 | #2,334 | 45 | 0.0026% |
| 1986 | #1,932 | 57 | 0.0033% |
| 1985 | #2,105 | 50 | 0.0029% |
| 1984 | #2,051 | 49 | 0.0029% |
| 1983 | #1,329 | 90 | 0.0054% |
| 1982 | #1,269 | 101 | 0.0060% |
| 1981 | #1,286 | 99 | 0.0059% |
| 1980 | #1,218 | 108 | 0.0065% |
| 1979 | #1,154 | 115 | 0.0072% |
| 1978 | #1,265 | 97 | 0.0063% |
| 1977 | #1,146 | 110 | 0.0072% |
| 1976 | #1,097 | 110 | 0.0075% |
| 1975 | #1,120 | 104 | 0.0071% |
| 1974 | #1,023 | 117 | 0.0080% |
| 1973 | #1,015 | 115 | 0.0079% |
| 1972 | #1,033 | 113 | 0.0074% |
| 1971 | #957 | 133 | 0.0080% |
| 1970 | #895 | 147 | 0.0084% |
| 1969 | #1,007 | 115 | 0.0068% |
| 1968 | #1,031 | 101 | 0.0062% |
| 1967 | #1,040 | 98 | 0.0059% |
| 1966 | #1,180 | 82 | 0.0048% |
| 1965 | #1,135 | 87 | 0.0049% |
| 1964 | #1,021 | 111 | 0.0059% |
| 1963 | #1,128 | 94 | 0.0049% |
| 1962 | #1,039 | 108 | 0.0055% |
| 1961 | #972 | 123 | 0.0061% |
| 1960 | #1,065 | 102 | 0.0050% |
| 1959 | #936 | 125 | 0.0062% |
| 1958 | #1,060 | 98 | 0.0049% |
| 1957 | #975 | 113 | 0.0055% |
| 1956 | #990 | 106 | 0.0053% |
| 1955 | #916 | 115 | 0.0059% |
| 1954 | #821 | 131 | 0.0067% |
| 1953 | #787 | 136 | 0.0072% |
| 1952 | #785 | 131 | 0.0071% |
| 1951 | #760 | 134 | 0.0074% |
| 1950 | #762 | 129 | 0.0075% |
| 1949 | #668 | 155 | 0.0091% |
| 1948 | #709 | 139 | 0.0082% |
| 1947 | #617 | 184 | 0.0104% |
| 1946 | #601 | 172 | 0.0109% |
| 1945 | #642 | 129 | 0.0099% |
| 1944 | #557 | 171 | 0.0129% |
| 1943 | #621 | 148 | 0.0106% |
| 1942 | #650 | 132 | 0.0098% |
| 1941 | #526 | 176 | 0.0146% |
| 1940 | #568 | 149 | 0.0130% |
| 1939 | #551 | 147 | 0.0134% |
| 1938 | #481 | 191 | 0.0173% |
| 1937 | #455 | 208 | 0.0195% |
| 1936 | #463 | 193 | 0.0186% |
| 1935 | #416 | 245 | 0.0234% |
| 1934 | #416 | 247 | 0.0237% |
| 1933 | #401 | 259 | 0.0257% |
| 1932 | #413 | 250 | 0.0234% |
| 1931 | #414 | 242 | 0.0227% |
| 1930 | #405 | 262 | 0.0233% |
| 1929 | #456 | 209 | 0.0187% |
| 1928 | #498 | 193 | 0.0167% |
| 1927 | #530 | 178 | 0.0149% |
| 1926 | #592 | 144 | 0.0121% |
| 1925 | #698 | 111 | 0.0091% |
| 1924 | #744 | 99 | 0.0079% |
| 1923 | #838 | 76 | 0.0063% |
| 1922 | #906 | 65 | 0.0054% |
| 1921 | #1,138 | 45 | 0.0036% |
| 1920 | #1,021 | 53 | 0.0044% |
| 1919 | #1,249 | 37 | 0.0033% |
| 1918 | #1,074 | 46 | 0.0040% |
| 1917 | #1,379 | 29 | 0.0027% |
| 1916 | #1,301 | 31 | 0.0030% |
| 1915 | #1,483 | 24 | 0.0024% |
| 1914 | #1,390 | 21 | 0.0028% |
| 1913 | #1,684 | 13 | 0.0021% |
| 1912 | #1,059 | 24 | 0.0043% |
| 1911 | #1,555 | 10 | 0.0024% |
| 1910 | #1,116 | 16 | 0.0040% |
| 1909 | #2,250 | 5 | 0.0014% |
| 1907 | #1,402 | 9 | 0.0028% |
| 1904 | #1,380 | 8 | 0.0029% |
| 1901 | #1,357 | 7 | 0.0029% |
| 1900 | #1,965 | 5 | 0.0017% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #1,097 | 195 | 0.0114% |
| 2024 | #1,123 | 189 | 0.0110% |
| 2023 | #1,191 | 169 | 0.0099% |
| 2022 | #1,033 | 214 | 0.0123% |
| 2021 | #1,023 | 215 | 0.0123% |
| 2020 | #849 | 268 | 0.0155% |
| 2019 | #880 | 250 | 0.0139% |
| 2018 | #822 | 272 | 0.0150% |
| 2017 | #786 | 298 | 0.0161% |
| 2016 | #754 | 322 | 0.0170% |
| 2015 | #740 | 328 | 0.0171% |
| 2014 | #754 | 313 | 0.0163% |
| 2013 | #665 | 363 | 0.0192% |
| 2012 | #714 | 331 | 0.0175% |
| 2011 | #683 | 345 | 0.0182% |
| 2010 | #552 | 457 | 0.0238% |
| 2009 | #576 | 458 | 0.0231% |
| 2008 | #524 | 515 | 0.0252% |
| 2007 | #503 | 523 | 0.0252% |
| 2006 | #483 | 546 | 0.0266% |
| 2005 | #490 | 505 | 0.0253% |
| 2004 | #451 | 573 | 0.0289% |
| 2003 | #451 | 559 | 0.0283% |
| 2002 | #399 | 644 | 0.0332% |
| 2001 | #389 | 655 | 0.0337% |
| 2000 | #364 | 730 | 0.0372% |
| 1999 | #359 | 729 | 0.0380% |
| 1998 | #325 | 835 | 0.0437% |
| 1997 | #299 | 913 | 0.0484% |
| 1996 | #290 | 932 | 0.0492% |
| 1995 | #269 | 1,046 | 0.0549% |
| 1994 | #255 | 1,136 | 0.0588% |
| 1993 | #238 | 1,221 | 0.0623% |
| 1992 | #221 | 1,387 | 0.0694% |
| 1991 | #206 | 1,508 | 0.0746% |
| 1990 | #185 | 1,677 | 0.0816% |
| 1989 | #172 | 1,759 | 0.0879% |
| 1988 | #163 | 1,715 | 0.0896% |
| 1987 | #147 | 1,889 | 0.1012% |
| 1986 | #130 | 2,105 | 0.1143% |
| 1985 | #135 | 2,094 | 0.1133% |
| 1984 | #129 | 2,119 | 0.1174% |
| 1983 | #118 | 2,357 | 0.1315% |
| 1982 | #113 | 2,605 | 0.1436% |
| 1981 | #110 | 2,658 | 0.1484% |
| 1980 | #109 | 2,724 | 0.1527% |
| 1979 | #106 | 2,584 | 0.1501% |
| 1978 | #110 | 2,398 | 0.1460% |
| 1977 | #105 | 2,539 | 0.1545% |
| 1976 | #97 | 2,644 | 0.1685% |
| 1975 | #93 | 2,772 | 0.1775% |
| 1974 | #92 | 2,792 | 0.1776% |
| 1973 | #93 | 2,889 | 0.1854% |
| 1972 | #90 | 3,172 | 0.1956% |
| 1971 | #79 | 3,652 | 0.2065% |
| 1970 | #87 | 3,636 | 0.1957% |
| 1969 | #82 | 3,653 | 0.2043% |
| 1968 | #81 | 3,629 | 0.2088% |
| 1967 | #83 | 3,778 | 0.2166% |
| 1966 | #82 | 4,067 | 0.2280% |
| 1965 | #80 | 4,588 | 0.2466% |
| 1964 | #73 | 5,083 | 0.2551% |
| 1963 | #75 | 5,212 | 0.2566% |
| 1962 | #78 | 5,323 | 0.2573% |
| 1961 | #76 | 5,403 | 0.2544% |
| 1960 | #73 | 5,652 | 0.2651% |
| 1959 | #72 | 5,676 | 0.2659% |
| 1958 | #69 | 5,737 | 0.2703% |
| 1957 | #78 | 5,617 | 0.2604% |
| 1956 | #77 | 5,358 | 0.2533% |
| 1955 | #75 | 5,223 | 0.2536% |
| 1954 | #72 | 5,508 | 0.2702% |
| 1953 | #74 | 5,179 | 0.2626% |
| 1952 | #77 | 4,960 | 0.2552% |
| 1951 | #77 | 5,006 | 0.2659% |
| 1950 | #65 | 5,018 | 0.2803% |
| 1949 | #67 | 5,120 | 0.2886% |
| 1948 | #62 | 5,581 | 0.3181% |
| 1947 | #60 | 6,116 | 0.3343% |
| 1946 | #53 | 5,771 | 0.3554% |
| 1945 | #53 | 5,049 | 0.3752% |
| 1944 | #50 | 5,411 | 0.3970% |
| 1943 | #46 | 6,121 | 0.4289% |
| 1942 | #43 | 6,249 | 0.4525% |
| 1941 | #35 | 6,590 | 0.5365% |
| 1940 | #30 | 6,882 | 0.5937% |
| 1939 | #29 | 7,056 | 0.6375% |
| 1938 | #27 | 7,497 | 0.6759% |
| 1937 | #24 | 7,745 | 0.7261% |
| 1936 | #24 | 7,735 | 0.7458% |
| 1935 | #24 | 7,726 | 0.7419% |
| 1934 | #23 | 7,530 | 0.7292% |
| 1933 | #26 | 6,490 | 0.6546% |
| 1932 | #30 | 6,597 | 0.6318% |
| 1931 | #32 | 5,858 | 0.5635% |
| 1930 | #41 | 5,182 | 0.4722% |
| 1929 | #50 | 3,924 | 0.3648% |
| 1928 | #65 | 2,971 | 0.2682% |
| 1927 | #91 | 2,287 | 0.2029% |
| 1926 | #116 | 1,595 | 0.1436% |
| 1925 | #150 | 1,085 | 0.0972% |
| 1924 | #191 | 733 | 0.0647% |
| 1923 | #260 | 470 | 0.0429% |
| 1922 | #293 | 370 | 0.0340% |
| 1921 | #365 | 274 | 0.0249% |
| 1920 | #468 | 170 | 0.0160% |
| 1919 | #629 | 93 | 0.0095% |
| 1918 | #701 | 81 | 0.0080% |
| 1917 | #799 | 62 | 0.0067% |
| 1916 | #897 | 49 | 0.0055% |
| 1915 | #965 | 42 | 0.0049% |
| 1914 | #908 | 36 | 0.0055% |
| 1913 | #1,451 | 14 | 0.0027% |
| 1912 | #1,280 | 14 | 0.0033% |
| 1911 | #991 | 12 | 0.0053% |
| 1910 | #1,209 | 8 | 0.0041% |
| 1909 | #1,031 | 9 | 0.0055% |
| 1908 | #1,235 | 6 | 0.0039% |
| 1907 | #1,366 | 5 | 0.0034% |
| 1906 | #1,018 | 7 | 0.0053% |
| 1905 | #746 | 11 | 0.0083% |
| 1904 | #891 | 8 | 0.0062% |
| 1900 | #1,061 | 7 | 0.0047% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.